General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPeople post images, articles, studies, etc. to counter RW talking points here all the time.
Are there any issues besides rape culture and misogyny where the poster will be asked to prove that someone on DU agrees with the RW talking points in order to justify posting it?
Are there any other issues where it will be implied that since everyone agrees that the RW talking points are wrong, that it shouldn't be posted?
Why are the topics of rape culture and misogyny treated this way?
one_voice
(20,043 posts)kcr
(15,315 posts)A poster said it shouldn't have been posted because no one on DU ever says victims should be blamed.
well I disagree with that poster. I rec'd that thread for the poster which I agree with. But there's a shit load of wrong in that thread.
kcr
(15,315 posts)How crazy is it that that is a controversial topic.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)There is already controversy before the obvious topic was posted, that everyone already fully agrees with 100%. The continued controversy had nothing to do with the actual post. Let's be honest and not pretend otherwise
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"Its not a controversial topic..."
I've never seen good swimmers complain or take offense at safety posters on display at the public pools. But maybe someone will pretend to know what's honest, and pretend otherwise...
treestar
(82,383 posts)In fact, men are more likely to be victims of homicide and assault, IIRR.
The distinction is: general safety applies to all. Safety tips for women vis a vis rape tend to be limiting her movement/activities in a way men are never told. Especially the clothing issues. It's the general threat of rape out there to get women to limit themselves.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)"men are more likely to be victims of homicide and assault'
Where did you get that BS from?
Here's an article you might want to read:
Men Struggle for Rape Awareness
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/24/health/as-victims-men-struggle-for-rape-awareness.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
treestar
(82,383 posts)in general.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)pipoman
(16,038 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)People here largely agree that RW talking points don't belong here and most here reject them out right.
When it gets to these issues though, out come accusations of "purity police", "division", and over defensiveness.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)I think that people respond to these posts with such hostility suggests that there is something worth discussing, and that not everybody actually does agree. If this really wasn't an issue there would be a few agreements and the threads would quickly die instead of going to 100-300 posts.
Not to say that this isn't an important issue; there are lots of important issues that only get 10-15 responses. The fact that these threads catch fire implies that people have something to say about them.
Bryant
redqueen
(115,103 posts)I'm sharing this on facebook or thanks for posting it. Even stuff that's been posted a few times already.
I could be an ass and ask you to go find two threads where people insinuated that because we all agree with it, the OP shouldn't be posted. Or because no one on DU agrees with the RW talking points discussed, it shouldn't be posted.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)While there are elements of this discussion that show up elsewhere the exact mix of "We all agree so shut up!" is pretty unique to this issue. Maybe at a push some White Privilege threads might see similar arguments but I don't recall them being as vehement.
Bryant
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)At Sun Dec 29, 2013, 06:20 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
People post images, articles, studies, etc. to counter RW talking points here all the time.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024248356
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
You may have noticed that there are a handful of posters on DU right now who seem intent on using GD as their own personal punchbowl to poop in. This is one of those posters. This thread is pure flamebait; meta-complaining about the responses to ANOTHER flamebait thread that's currently going on in GD. Please send a message that most reasonable people on DU are getting tired of the nonsense.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Dec 29, 2013, 06:28 PM, and the Jury voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Well I think i'm a reasonable person, and I think that Red Queen makes some good points. Or at least points that are worth discussing. El_Bryanto
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Let the discussion continue and see what happens.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Misuse of alert system. There is nothing hide-worthy here.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Please send a message to the alerter that we are tired of this nonsense.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)OTT alert.
Mister Ed
(5,928 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Context matters.
DU has been brow-beaten with bullying posts against men for months, on a massive scale, with a range of topics.
So when yet the 50th redundant and obvious gender post gets thrown up--even if it is devoid of the other accusations against men on DU shared by the 49 previous posts--the context is still there. People are still sick of them. We get what its all about. We aren't dim.
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)Does it really matter if it's the 9083794573094578341st time?
It's really annoying. I've trashed, I kid you not, 31 threads since last Monday.
This one will be #32.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)These posts are against rape culture. They are against misogyny.
There are many topics I'm sick of. I don't even need to hide them, thought that feature is available (why people don't use it - and instead whine or announce that they're hiding a thread, I will never understand, most likely just attention-seeking drama I'm sure), I just don't click them.
RC
(25,592 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024241107
Why don't more people hide posts, trash threads and put others on Ignore? Because they empowers the guilty. There are less people to counter, to stand up to, the harassment and bullying of those that post OP's designed to degenerate into flame wars.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)So now people who discuss rape culture and misogyny are "the guilty"?
I love the idea that posts calling out rape culture and misogyny are "designed to degenerate into flame wars".
People who posts OPs calling out rape culture and misogyny are just asking for flames, by talking about rape culture and misogyny at all, right RC?
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)You can easily say this doesn't represent the country, but these are the people using this site and posting here. Their experience is being ruined from these tactics. Its overwhelming. Its not a fluke. Denying it is just more excusing of bad behavior.
People who posts OPs calling out rape culture and misogyny are just asking for flames, by talking about rape culture and misogyny at all,
That's not what is happening. That is just a frame to claim oppression and play the victim.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)It really is that simple.
Threads calling out rape culture and misogyny are not "attacking men" or "brow beating men".
You claim to be so sick of this subject, but you are all over just about every one of them. Why is that?
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Ignoring the threads and letting other people get bullied in them is a viable option.
Threads calling out rape culture and misogyny are not "attacking men" or "brow beating men".
They can be when worded terribly and constructed offensively. They don't need to be.
You claim to be so sick of this subject, but you are all over just about every one of them. Why is that?
Why, this is meta to play the victim, right?
redqueen
(115,103 posts)You've posted in it ten times (so far).
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Do you find yourself doing that often? Its not constructive to pretend people are saying things they are not.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)That's not happening here, yet here you are, flaming it up.
It's completely transparent. Well, it apparently has somehow missed 91 other people, but... well... yeah.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Why are you posting here?
The reason I am posting in this particular thread is to set the record straight, as I do not agree with the victimization/oppression frame.
Is meta even allowed in GD anymore?
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Have you somehow missed this thread? It's missing your valuable and copious contributions.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024249560
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Context suggests otherwise.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)I see you use it a lot and I have to ask what you mean by it.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Posts in DU about other posts in DU. Often used to complain about treatment or activity of past posts, rather than discuss any actual relevant topic
haikugal
(6,476 posts)xulamaude
(847 posts)Because I will not STFU about rape culture and misogyny until they no longer exist.
RC
(25,592 posts)Please supply some examples and links.
You can read. If you don't see it then you don't see it.
I do.
RC
(25,592 posts)Not on DU anyway. Because anyone pushing the rape culture and misogyny here, would not last long
xulamaude
(847 posts)I won't.
As I said, if you don't see it then you don't see it and no number of links to posts would (I believe) convince you otherwise.
RC
(25,592 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)that it is not an issue, we have already heard the issue, not the issue democrats should focus on are all part of the rape culture. welcome to your participation.
satisfied....
lumberjack telling us rape has dropped so significantly over last two decades that it is not an issue anymore
cheering the football player that obviously had authorities stall an investigation and fans cheered the dismissal of any real investigation
a handful of men in the ogglin threads saying the way the girls dressed was them ASKING for the attention
men telling women street harassment is not an issue and even if it was they should be complimented.
i can go on and on and on
and no
i wont be reading, nor responding to any of your posts. i am posting for readers who may be saying... huh?
RC
(25,592 posts)Can you name DU names of people supporting this "Rape Culture"? Can you supply evidence of any DU group(s) supporting this? Can you provide links to where anyone on DU is supporting a rape culture?
I am seeing far less misogyny around here than I am seeing, not so well disguised misandry and bulling by a certain group. In other words bully posts against men of DU in general. DU is a more or less Liberal web site, is it not? Most people here do not hold too many Right-wing views. Then why treat us if we are misandrist, when most here are far from it?
As some of your group sometimes say, DU has Ignore and trash thread functions. Use them, if you don't like what other members post.
But that is counter to your primary purpose in this, now is it? Only others should use these functions, correct?
Stop stirring stuff up and there would not be anything to push back against, from the rest of DU. As others have said, it is less the subject matter, than it is who is doing this and doing it over and over again. Along with the unwarranted ridicule, insults, belittling and even outright attacks designed to browbeat and intimidate anyone that does not toe your party line. And don't forget the often purposeful misunderstanding of posts that are in response to most any post that don't adhere to your party line. Responses that are designed to elicit a response in return, sufficient to persuade enough jury members to hide. That is the real purpose of all this, isn't it? To lock people out. Shut them up? Silence them?
[center][/center]
redqueen
(115,103 posts)xulamaude
(847 posts)I'm guessing you meant 'misogynist'.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)But you know what I mean.
xulamaude
(847 posts)Mostly because I am pretty good at reading things in context.
treestar
(82,383 posts)"accusation against men" even to discuss these things. You have to take it personally? These are theories about society. In general.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)There is more accusations and straw men arguments (including this) than any real discussion. Are you being purposely obtuse?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)They think they are victims because they have to read about rape, and us talking about rape is long-term abusive behavior. Really.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Not every post does this. Some do. Yes.
historylovr
(1,557 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)I do know that before you posted the PSA thread we were drowning in gender issue controversy because "tone" has been a major issue. Tone. But people already have an excuse for bad behavior.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Its not even the content I care about (as its important in general). Its presented sloppily, with controversy, repeatedly, to the same effect, and again, over and over, woven with straw men and bullying......
The fact of the matter is this thread is, considering context, more of the same (do you think the poster intended to do anything in GD besides continue the gender war?). We know what the context is. We know why these gender issue threads are controversial. Context.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Context. That PSA thread spawned 100 other GD trash threads accusing men of doing all sorts of nasty things.
Context. Its an incredible concept.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)If you had ever strictly stuck to posting gender issues, I think this all would of went better
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)people who chose to vote in a silly flamebait poll?
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)In the end, we can always pretend facts are fiction
gollygee
(22,336 posts)and it was an incredibly poorly worded poll.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)of anything.If you're going to cite them as "proof" that the majority of DU agrees with you,you shouldn't be lecturing the rest of us on fact versus fiction.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)but not just replying to threads, but starting their own, then they aren't really sick of them.
And we aren't starting "gender war threads." We're starting threads about rape and misogyny. Others are turning them into gender war threads instead of trashing the threads if they aren't interested in discussions about rape and misogyny.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)my opinions. You know what you can do if discussing gender related threads bother you? You can choose to ignore them. It's one thing to be tired of an issue being discussed on DU,it's another to demand that these discussions stop for everyone else too.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Unfortunately its still spilling over into GD. Still.
And BTW, I'm not tired of these issues being discussed. They aren't being discussed. Period. Its all flame wars at this point.
xulamaude
(847 posts)Really? You wouldn't be suggesting that we just stay in HOF would you?
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)of threads you don't like,you don't have the choice to demand everybody else adhere to your personal choices and dislikes.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Hell, honestly, calling out the attacks and bullying behavior just adds fuel on the fire.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)absence up until you arrived a couple of months ago.
I've been here a while. I've just noticed the venom got turned up a notch recently.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Just wait till the primaries, if you think this is "venom".
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)of online polls and think they're a ridiculous way to "prove" anything other than the very lame attempt to hide behind numbers as some sort of litmus test for popularity.
Kali
(55,007 posts)the responses to that poll may not mean what you think they do
in fact the whole issue kind of boils down to a minority not being "heard"
part of my interest in democracy has to do with giving voice to people who might make majorities uncomfortable
so, some "out there" women try to do that and DU turns into a gigantic fertilizer spreader? interesting reaction those in power and those that are protected by that power seem to have to the issues brought up by a minority of uppity wimminz
carry on with the predictable responses
xulamaude
(847 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)93 recommends
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4187202
198 recommends
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024214731
132 recommends
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)I've seen the deluge of controversy since at least October surrounding issues from abortion, rape, breastfeeding, wage gaps, morality of murdering husbands in their sleep, feminism in general, leering, etc. Why are you so obsessed with 3 posts you made? We have thousands of crappy gender war post providing plenty of context. I may or not even be referring to you specifically at all, much less a few specific cherry picked threads of yours. I really, really, don't understand your point.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)in GD without meeting that friction and spawning of threads created to be disruptive. because, we women should rightly put up a post and with recommends showing their value should not be bullying and harrassed.
that is what is with my psa issues.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)I didn't read it. I didn't comment in it. I've mentiond that. I don't watch videos online normally. That's just my two cents.
because it is the PSA spawning the anger and your supposed gender war.
This is ignoring context. There was already controversy. There was already bullying.
that is what is with my psa issues.
I think you need to understand that not everyone sees it your way. That post doesn't exist in a vacuum with no history
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)You can not both simultaneously be the victim while engaging in strawman, bullying tactics.
You see, it always devolves to this. This is the pattern. This is the context; the history. This is why your PSA threads do not exist in a vacuum.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Damn.
Move on, already.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)when certain feminist issues are discussed.
I get that your goal here is to derail and try to distract from the topic at hand, but I just thought I might point that out, in case you were somehow genuinely confused.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)This is more of the divisive, defaming tactics that are causing the problems
I am not distracting from the topic at hand. I am contributing to it. The OP claims some type of victimization/persecution. I am correcting the record. There is context that is being left out.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)was a rape porn thread about laws in uk. put in gd by a MAN, who was getting a giggle at stirring up shit.
you want to keep going thru what started these "outrageous" of yours?
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)You tell me GD needs to hear this? These arguments are sandfights. They aren't educational. People don't want to sit around and read you twist arguments, mischaracterize posts, create strawmen and bully. That's the controversy. That's the context.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Keep blazing ahead. Best of luck to you
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)such a manipulative.... tactic. ya. gotcha
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)why a PSA was treated with such derision when PSAs are posted here all the time. There is no logical answer as to why Trumads OP turned into a shit flinging mess.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Context, context, context.
That thread was posted in the midst of controversy that already existed, some of which spawned from accusations that DU itself promotes rape culture (and I have links). Some took the existence of yet another redundant and OBVIOUS point that EVERYONE already agrees with as a jab at the alleged pro-"rape culture" DUers, rather than something educational.
And besides that, Trumad's language in the thread was extremely explicit. That couldn't have helped.
To ignore the context is to play the victim. We get what is going on here. We are all not stupid. You know exactly what the logic behind the continued controversy was.
Meta meta meta
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Play the victim of what? Those are freeper words.
xulamaude
(847 posts)Well there's a flat out opinion.
What's so sloppy about it?
Matariki
(18,775 posts)that's grand. lol
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)"DU has been brow-beaten with bullying posts against men for months"
Maybe they just stand out a little more to you.
I don't remember seeing any "bullying post against men". Have an example?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Or if you are just making that attitude up, let me know
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Strawman arguments are uber-effective at communicating messages. The best thing about them is that when people take offense, they can just be accused of being reactionary misogynist who are oppressing the messenger.
You do see where this is going, don't you?
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)"Bullying posts against men". Really? I don't especially see discussions about rape and public sexual harassment by strangers to be "against men" as much as they are against certain cultural attitudes and behaviours that, yes, are largely perpetuated by some but not all men. Any more than I see discussions of racism as being "against white people", or discussions of LGBT rights as being "against straight people" (or even better "aimed at destroying the traditional family" . If you feel threatened or particularly targeted by such discussions, perhaps you should be asking yourself why you feel that way.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)But everyone else knows threads like this are all over:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024193962
Nope, rape discussion isn't "against men". Threads against men are against men. And there are plenty of them--so much so--that when a normal feminist issue gets posted without any of the normal generalization and accusations, we already know the context its being in.
None of these posts exist in a vacuum. Clean, honest discussion about feminist issues in GD are exceptions (that are used as examples to show how everyone is reacting oh so horrendously), not rules. The distance between how we see what is happening couldn't be further
BTW, the oh so innocent thread that this meta posts is referring to wasn't innocent. Remember context?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4247742
It was posted with the intent of stirring a stirred up pot. It wasn't posted to educate. It was posted to be decisive. The OP called it a "fly trap".
So yes, lets forget the venom. Lets forget the fly trap. Lets forget every nasty thing the HoFers have done, and then we can really pigeonhole men who are complaining *for nothing* because we just won't recognize anything that disturbs our theory. But we both know thats is what is really absurd.
Fly trap. And this thread is meta on a fly trap being pissed on.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)Here's some context. Society hasn't really changed as much on some issues as some people would like to believe. A majority of people no longer think that being gay is deviant and that LGBT discrimination should be legal. A majority of people no longer think that for African-Americans to believe they should have the same rights of citizenship and opportunity is "uppity". But you know...a woman who is as sexually assertive and self-directed as a man is still regarded by many as a "slut", women who are victims of sexual assault are still subject to societal disapproval ("she was asking for it, it's her fault for being dressed that way, she shouldn't have been drinking" . And what do you think the whole "culture wars" issues of abortion rights, contraception, sex education and abstinence are about? A teenage girl who gets pregnant? Still subject to much more societal disapproval than the boy who got her pregnant, becayse boys will be boys, won't they? There are some inherent cultural attitudes to "acceptable" gendered behaviours that place different levels of expectation and assumed responsibility on women in ways that are pretty inherently unfair, which is what all of these issues really come down to.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Careful what you are going to bat for. A pot-stirring fly-trap.
I understand everything you are saying; you are preaching to the choir. But it has little to do with the attacks and trolling that people are objecting to
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)Why do some folks think it is because folks want to stir up trouble or make women look bad?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/125533487
Are there any other issues where it will be implied that since everyone agrees that the RW talking points are wrong, that it shouldn't be posted?
Would it make a difference if there were? More to the point - it might just be because of WHO is posting it...so in comes the question of motive (which, btw, circles back to the first sentence in this reply).
Since there is a group to post such items in and it is generally assumed that posters here are liberal and have the same core ideals (equality and so on) and given that the folks usually posting such things feel that DU is filled with misogynistic men (and women who are our cohorts "As always, it's good to see the boys show up to defend their right to jack off to anything, no matter how awful. And their little group of female cohorts, eager to get that pat on the head from the guys. I wonder if these dudes have ANY idea how they come across? It's a sad and pathetic picture that they paint, and I doubt they have any idea they're doing it." http://www.democraticunderground.com/125530116#post10 ) it is no shock that sometimes such posts are met with questions.
My reasoning for posting things get questions here and there. Folks inquire about intent - even though the article might be benign or just plain interesting (I do a 3 hour radio show a week and post other places, like reddit politics/news/world, my own forums, etc and I come across a slew of stories from all over the world I post).
They don't question the information/story itself, but my motives for posting it.
The same applies here. And since, as can seen from the first link, it is wholly acceptable to question such motives elsewhere I am not sure why one would be surprised when the same ideals are echoed back. I am not overly shocked when people questions my motives, and I certainly don't think some others should be either.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)are also seen as opportunities to express solidarity.
I think the ancient male vs. female, adversarial relationship confuses many.
We always tend to resent the possessor and granter of our deepest ideals of happiness when we lack it. When we lack love we never resent or blame the gender to which we're not attracted, unless they are $&%#~blocking us. Pardon me.
When some males encounter women so on guard against rape, they must erroneously tie that in with a reluctance for all forms of interaction between the two genders and thus almost instinctively feel resentment.
That's the best I can come up with.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Last edited Mon Dec 30, 2013, 01:04 PM - Edit history (1)
Guys need to understand that most often, that woman's friend whom you find less attractive, the one who shows up and 'ruins your chances'? She's actually most often simply helping her friend.
She's been given a sign, and she's doing her friend a favor, and you never had a chance to begin with.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)you are again either accidentally or purposefully clouding what was actually said.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4247418
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4247447
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4247610
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4248670
That's from just one thread.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)More money for fusion research!
Construction Going on Track!
Under the blue drying tents, the first 21 x 26 metre segment of the Tokamak Complex basemat slab (the B2 slab) is in place. The next pour is scheduled for early 2014.
GO ITER!!!
ITER (originally an acronym of International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor and Latin for "the way" or "the road" is an international nuclear fusion research and engineering project, which is currently building the world's largest experimental tokamak nuclear fusion reactor adjacent to the Cadarache facility in the south of France.[1] The ITER project aims to make the long-awaited transition from experimental studies of plasma physics to full-scale electricity-producing fusion power plants. The project is funded and run by seven member entities the European Union (EU), India, Japan, China, Russia, South Korea and the United States. The EU, as host party for the ITER complex, is contributing 45% of the cost, with the other six parties contributing 9% each.[2][3][4]
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)Which gun-related issues are assumed to be things that we all agree on and therefore don't need to talk about?
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)If you posted 30 op's in one day saying "Republicans are idiots" do you think there would not be a certain amount of people going "yeah no shit"?
Do you think that the majority of people on DU "blame the victim" and need to be told multiple times a day that rape is never the fault of the victim?
Personally I think the majority of people on DU are good people. I think they know that a rape culture exists and would love to come together to draw out solutions rather than see another thread telling them what they already know.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)No one has posted 30 OPs per day saying "rape is bad".
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)WTF are you talking about? You asked a question and I answered. Apparently you didn't like the answer. So you accuse me of using some imaginary "tactic".
There is no strategy here, no conspiracy, and no misogyny just a desire to stop laying blame and start making solutions.
Frankly your response makes me think you don't really want anything but a fight.
Good luck with that.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Are there any other issues where it will be implied that since everyone agrees that the RW talking points are wrong, that it shouldn't be posted?
Then you say:
Nobody says multiple times per day that rape is never the fault of the victim.
If anyone involved in this exchange is just looking for a fight it's you, throwing out absurd claims like that, and the '30 posts per day', and making up stuff about "laying blame".
The solution is to get people to recognize rape culture. Many people (yes, even here on DU) seem not to even know what it is, if not outright deny it even exists.
Guess what that means? Yes, more exposure.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)thousands of "republicans are idiots" posts along with "rec if you think fill-in-the-obvious-democratic- viewpoint "OPs . I have never seen any of those countered with the type of "not this shit again" that obvious feminist / women's issues OPs get here recently.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Who the fuck am I to argue. No one ever posts "no shit" on DU. Only to rape threads.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)From a "weed" thread
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024256218#post3
from a "Snowden" thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024251513#post1
I'm not going to bother to look for more as I'm sure they are everywhere as I stated.
I'd appreciate not being called a liar. Thanks.
kcr
(15,315 posts)xulamaude
(847 posts)Some apparently do not know.
Some ask for women to define it, prove it, provide links for it (all of which has been done repeatedly, btw) and still we are asked if it exists here on DU - just upthread as a matter of fact.
Sometimes it's the 30th or 50th or 1000th "lecture" that gets the point across.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)But that was an answer to the question posted in the OP. And answers were not what the OP was looking for.
I have been accused of lying. That there aren't 30 posts a day on the rape culture. Well, I stopped looking when I got to 15 because I know it doesn't matter. I have dealt with this before. If I post 30 links from the last day on the rape culture then the semantics will come out.
I. Am. Not. The. Enemy.
I was trying to help. Maybe give a little insight. But that's not wanted here.
xulamaude
(847 posts)you did say that 'rape culture is understood here' and I countered that obviously it is not understood.
That is all.
historylovr
(1,557 posts)like they do when it's rape or rape culture. Granted, it's a very vocal minority, but clearly it threatens them on some deep level.
AZCat
(8,339 posts)Most of the extremely controversial ones have been relegated to other parts of the DU forums, which is why you might not be aware of them.
Say what you will about our group of compatriots here, but at least we're passionate people!
historylovr
(1,557 posts)I usually avoid them, so I don't see more than the usual four or five trollish bunch.
TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)n/t
historylovr
(1,557 posts)What the fuck does Nader have to do with this?
TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)Hint, look at what you said in the post I was replying to before reading my reply, then take my reply at face value. Nader is one of many issues here where people spazz out about the topic. (Are we allowed to use the word spazz? That's probably a no-no.)
TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)Melinda
(5,465 posts)That's what I get from the most outspoken men on this thread.
Just be still and shut up. Stop playing the victim.
I don't participate, as a general rule, in threads with sexual assault and rape as the topic. They trigger me and so I trash them, again, as a general rule. However I have noticed that there have been many posted lately that seem to have a few.... well, a few participants who basically keep telling you and others to sit down (be still) and shut up.
They too have the option to trash/ignore. However they choose to tell you to sit still, be quiet....
And I am reminded. I haven't the emotional strength to fight it. And so I do what I need to do. I avoid.
I am reminded. And I understand and know what the answer to your questions are.
And I am in awe of you and sea and others ability to stand up, speak out, and attempt to educate. And not be intimidated. Just in awe.
And with that, I'll back out again. Just wanted you to know how I feel right now.
xulamaude
(847 posts)Melinda
(5,465 posts)I appreciate your kind words and am very happy to *meet* you. Happy happy New Year!!
-Mel
redqueen
(115,103 posts)I'm sorry if anything I've posted has been triggering. I try to include a warning but I know I sometimes forget.
Thanks for speaking up.
Melinda
(5,465 posts)I can not stress enough how important it is to share everything about the subject of sexual violence with people of all sexes... how to protect ourselves, how to change behaviors, impress on others just how deeply victims are negatively affected on all levels throughout their whole lives, how sexual assault can psychically destroy the individual and their families, how it can prevent victims from having even a modicum of a 'normal' life.... so many levels, so much trauma that more than often never ever heals.
It has cyclical and generational repercussions that will never ever change unless sexual violence and it's impact on human lives becomes totally open for discussion; no fear and no shame. I find it mind boggling that there are some here who wish to squelch the discussion. I wish those who oppose this discussion would take a long hard look at themselves and ask why, or, at the very least, respect those of you trying to affect positive change and raise awareness by utilizing ignore/trash as opposed to coming into the discussion to silence it. Thus what seems like misogyny comes into play.
Is it deliberate? I don't know, but there it is.
Anyway, to reiterate, yours is an important voice here, as is sea's, and I appreciate the work you all do. I know how to read a topic sentence and avoid the discussion as do each and every one of those attempting to silence you on DU. Know that for everyone of those voices, there are countless others here reading and learning and healing and changing for the better. And we all thank you for this. I hope you and your family have a wonderful New Year. Stay strong. I remain in awe.
-Mel
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)a huge bear hug of love and light.
too many people ask me why. i tell them, there are women that want to be heard, and do not want the ugly. i and others can do.
that is why
Melinda
(5,465 posts)I am so happy to know your voice will NOT be silenced for good. Your works are important, and hopefully Skinner and Co. realize this. If not, they should. Thanks for every kindness you've shown me these many years, and it is my New Years wish for you that you can take this small break to refresh and be kind to yourself. Bask in the love of family and friends, re-center, and come back stronger than ever.
You amaze me, sea. Have the best New Year ever!! See you on the flip side.
-Mel
1000words
(7,051 posts)That is all
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)Good points, as usual. Any posts from you and sea are always worth reading.