Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGuess which line is Profits and which is Labor Compensation...
This chart is from a Krugman piece entitled, "Why Corporations Might Not Mind Moderate Depression"
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/25/why-corporations-might-not-mind-moderate-depression/
There are intriguing economic reasons discussed.
And a conclusion about why there has been no political fix for the economy.
Now, about the political economy: I dont think we have to believe in a cabal of CEOs trying to keep the economy depressed. All that we need is for the big money to find the state of the economy OK from its point of view, so that politicians who listen to that money lose interest in the unemployed. You can round up a whos who of CEOs for Fix the Debt; you cant even get started on a power-list drive to Fix the Economy. And so it remains unfixed.
.
.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 1329 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (30)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guess which line is Profits and which is Labor Compensation... (Original Post)
cthulu2016
Dec 2013
OP
I would love to see "productivity" overlaid on that graph. Thanks for posting. nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#7
I think I've seen it and I think it tracks profits but isnt as steep. But much higher
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#11
El_Johns
(1,805 posts)1. K&R
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)2. Recommended!
WowSeriously
(343 posts)3. I wonder if the rapidly climbing blue line
And the slightly cratered red line around the year 2010 had anything to do with midterm election debacle.
Nah, it's the frigg'n liberals and the professional left's fault.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)6. You mean the "radical liberals" and the "extremest, professional left."
Those that whine if they cant have freedom and liberty. Cheese-us!
WowSeriously
(343 posts)9. I stand corrected!
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)4. Kick And Recommend
eom
Wounded Bear
(58,647 posts)5. Entirely logical...
Executive salaries and perks are tied to corporate profits. There are no incentives or pressures to advance wages of workers.
There really are two economies at play and it would seem that I am in the wrong one.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)7. I would love to see "productivity" overlaid on that graph. Thanks for posting. nm
WowSeriously
(343 posts)10. I think you find productivity tracking with the blue line,
Perhaps with a more rapid rise.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)11. I think I've seen it and I think it tracks profits but isnt as steep. But much higher
than wages.
WowSeriously
(343 posts)12. That actually seems more accurate.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)8. du rec.