Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 07:32 PM Jan 2014

Rose Parade Coverage Disgustingly Thin And Cheap.

You wonder why ABC and NBC even bothers to show up at the Rose Parade in its 125th year. There were too many commercials and too much idle chatter and not enough coverage of the parade itself. And they left a lot of floats out of the coverage. They also did very little interviewing. It looked like they had only three people for the camera work. And there was almost no background coverage like there was in the past. Besides that they cut away from the parade long before it was over.

One network was in a hurry to get to the hockey game of little interest. The parade was more than half an hour from being over when they ended coverage. A lot of people do a lot of work for this parade and network coverage was no better than the local news. I guess they cannot afford to pay any reporting talent because the CEO needs a new yacht.

Compared to years past the coverage of this parade has slipped miserably. There used to be shows before the parade talking to people who put in the hours of work. There were interest pieces to fill in what the parade is all about. Maybe the networks were mad about the gay marriage.

It is obvious that our media no longer serves the public an any significant way. They insulted the parade workers by short shifting coverage. We have to take back the media and FORCE them to do the job.

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rose Parade Coverage Disgustingly Thin And Cheap. (Original Post) TheMastersNemesis Jan 2014 OP
on tv one rose parade looks pretty much like the others. in so cal they are rerun over and over lol msongs Jan 2014 #1
Hallmark channel had the best coverage of all places... JCMach1 Jan 2014 #2
Agree. They showed the whole parade without commercials. Esse Quam Videri Jan 2014 #6
that originates from KTLA itsrobert Jan 2014 #7
I've always wished they'd get rid of the yappers and just show the event Warpy Jan 2014 #3
most everything around the holiday time of year on TV rurallib Jan 2014 #4
I'm in SoCal, here at least one station has it with no commercials and then repeats Raine Jan 2014 #5
see post 7 itsrobert Jan 2014 #8
yup that's channel #5, they have the best coverage. nt Raine Jan 2014 #24
Which is why I haven't xxqqqzme Jan 2014 #29
i find the parade boring but i agree that they should provide better coverage JI7 Jan 2014 #9
Very few people care about the Rose Parade anymore. Codeine Jan 2014 #10
Agreed alcibiades_mystery Jan 2014 #12
I Agree That The Parade Is Less Relevant. It May Go The Way Of The Dodo Bird Eventually. TheMastersNemesis Jan 2014 #15
It's a helluva party though. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2014 #21
Lots of young people go to see it in person ... Raine Jan 2014 #25
My interest was for that one network to get to the hockey game! tritsofme Jan 2014 #11
me too! frylock Jan 2014 #19
Same here. TheMightyFavog Jan 2014 #22
It was THE parade for so long. elfin Jan 2014 #13
We watched it on HGTV........ Capt.Rocky300 Jan 2014 #14
I watched the parade on the Hallmark Channel...... chillfactor Jan 2014 #16
Here in Los Angeles KTLA airs it uninterrupted all day. Initech Jan 2014 #17
My wife was fit to be tied MrYikes Jan 2014 #18
If you have cable or satellite, the Hallmark Channel was good. catbyte Jan 2014 #28
I'm watching the Mummer's Fancy Brigades right now....and grateful msanthrope Jan 2014 #20
nothing beats the Mummers. kwassa Jan 2014 #27
I watched most of it on RFD tv. Morning Dew Jan 2014 #23
I much prefer the Pasadena Doo Dah Parade, the satire on the Rose Bowl parade kwassa Jan 2014 #26

Warpy

(111,122 posts)
3. I've always wished they'd get rid of the yappers and just show the event
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 07:41 PM
Jan 2014

The same applies to the Olympics, especially opening ceremonies and ice skating competitions.

I don't need vacuous blow dried dim bulbs unleashing a torrent of verbal diarrhea, honestly.

rurallib

(62,373 posts)
4. most everything around the holiday time of year on TV
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 07:42 PM
Jan 2014

has so many commercials and self promotion that if it is something I want to see I record it and play it back skipping commercials. Else I just blow it off any more.

Fuck them money grubbing greedy bastards.

Raine

(30,540 posts)
5. I'm in SoCal, here at least one station has it with no commercials and then repeats
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 07:43 PM
Jan 2014

it continually thru out the day. Unfortunately for Thanksgiving we see the Macy's parade the way you see the Rose Parade, endless commercials and spotty coverage.

JI7

(89,239 posts)
9. i find the parade boring but i agree that they should provide better coverage
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 07:47 PM
Jan 2014

and focus on the floats and others in the parade if they are going to show it.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
10. Very few people care about the Rose Parade anymore.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 07:47 PM
Jan 2014

It simply isn't on the radar of anyone under the age of 45, based on what I've experienced. I've never met anyone my age who thinks parades/floats/baton drill teams/whatever are anything other than slightly pathetic television fodder for our grandparents. When entertainment consisted of three channels and the radio the Rose Parade probably seemed like a big deal; in the Internet Age, with three hundred channels on my TV, streaming movies and shows, and DVDs arriving in your mailbox, it's not so much.

If people were interested and tuned in they'd have the coverage those viewers would warrant. Nobody cares so the coverage suffers.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
12. Agreed
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 07:50 PM
Jan 2014

I thought the OP was parody until I realized that maybe some people care about shit like this.

Not many, though.

 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
15. I Agree That The Parade Is Less Relevant. It May Go The Way Of The Dodo Bird Eventually.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 07:58 PM
Jan 2014

It is a generational thing for sure.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
21. It's a helluva party though.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 11:12 PM
Jan 2014

I've never watched it on T.V. but have slept on Colorado Boulevard maybe 20 times... It's a whole different experience when you're 20 ft away.

Anyone who hasn't seen Locke High School's marching band hasn't seen a marching band.

Raine

(30,540 posts)
25. Lots of young people go to see it in person ...
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 12:19 AM
Jan 2014

I guess that makes it not a grandparent thing but when you're old and decrepit sleeping out on the curb to see a parade is physically not always possible.

TheMightyFavog

(13,770 posts)
22. Same here.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 11:33 PM
Jan 2014

Red Wings got robbed. That switching sides halfway through OT is a bullshit house rule for the Winter Classic.

I will say this though: The one float that had the three separate little floats on it was wicked cool, and a real neat piece of engineering.

elfin

(6,262 posts)
13. It was THE parade for so long.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 07:53 PM
Jan 2014

Now college football is diluted with a proliferation of bowls and "championships", relegating the parade and even the game a bit to lesser status.

The invention of a national championship was the beginning of the end IMO. Now the big 10 is 12 and growing beyond the traditional geography of the "Midwest", which was more closely aligned with the old Northwest territory of yore.

The descent of college football to its current phony status is sad. Just pay them already out of that obscene tv money and don't even try to make it look like they are getting a real degree. Celebrate the ones who do far more than the ones who don't.

But right now this Ann Arbor alum is rooting for Sparty - a first.

Capt.Rocky300

(1,005 posts)
14. We watched it on HGTV........
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 07:55 PM
Jan 2014

Nice there were no commercials but the folks doing the commenting were complete buffoons. They couldn't pronounce many of the local city names on the floats or the names of the flowers. We'll try Hallmark next year.

chillfactor

(7,572 posts)
16. I watched the parade on the Hallmark Channel......
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 08:23 PM
Jan 2014

the coverge was fantastic and they covered the entire parade.....

MrYikes

(720 posts)
18. My wife was fit to be tied
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 08:52 PM
Jan 2014

and had brutal things to say about the channel she was watching while berating the hockey that took away from the parade. She won't waste her time next year.

catbyte

(34,326 posts)
28. If you have cable or satellite, the Hallmark Channel was good.
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 01:41 AM
Jan 2014

Whole parade, no interruptions, & they even congratulated the gay couple getting married. They ran it at least twice.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rose Parade Coverage Disg...