Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 01:21 AM Jan 2014

3 reasons why Fukushima has nothing to do with Starfish Wasting Syndrome

http://fukushimaupdate.com/three-reasons-why-fukushima-radiation-has-nothing-to-do-with-starfish-wasting-syndrome/

This post is authored by Chris Mah, a Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History researcher. Chris is one of the world’s leading experts on starfish and echinoderms in general. He created and writes for Echinoblog, a one stop reading place for everything echinoderm. You can find him at Twitter @echinoblog.

Some have become concerned that there is a direct influence from Fukushima. Much of this seems unlikely. Deep-Sea News (among many other sources) have presented excellent reviews of data that can help the rational person make sense from some of the confusing deluge of misinformation.

1) Starfish Wasting Disease/Syndrome (SWD/SWS) pre-Dates Fukushima by 3 to 15 years. This is probably the most self-evident of reasons. One of the earliest accounts of starfish wasting disease was recorded from Southern California (Channel Islands) in 1997 (pdf). The account of SWS in British Columbia was first documented by Bates et al. in 2009, and their data was collected in 2008. Fukushima? March 2011.

2) Starfish Wasting Syndrome Occurs on the East Coast as well as the Pacific. Many of the accounts alleging a Fukushima connection to Starfish Wasting Syndrome forget that there are also accounts of SWS on the east coast of the United States affecting the asteriid Asterias rubens. There is no evidence (or apparent mechanism) for Fukushima radiation to have reached the east coast and therefore the Fukushima idea is again not supported.

3) No other life in these regions seems to have been affected. If we watch the original British Columbia Pycnopodia die-off videos, and the later Washington state die-off vidoes, one cannot help but notice that other than the starfish, EVERYTHING else remains alive. Fish. Seaweed, encrusting animals. etc.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
3 reasons why Fukushima has nothing to do with Starfish Wasting Syndrome (Original Post) Bonobo Jan 2014 OP
I love echinoblog (and deep sea news and aquanerd and.. and.. and.. ) X_Digger Jan 2014 #1
I would lay bets if they look hard enough they will find this is toxic shock speading along Drew Richards Jan 2014 #2
But, but, but... longship Jan 2014 #3
Good Luck grantcart Jan 2014 #4
Thanks for this post. I'm still waiting for someone--anyone--to post a CREDIBLE link Common Sense Party Jan 2014 #5

Drew Richards

(1,558 posts)
2. I would lay bets if they look hard enough they will find this is toxic shock speading along
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 01:39 AM
Jan 2014

The coast from oil spills...much more probable than anything to do with Fukushima.

longship

(40,416 posts)
3. But, but, but...
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 02:33 AM
Jan 2014

The herring! The salmon! The eagles in Utah! The Arctic ice decrease! And don't forget the elephants in Africa! It has to be Fukushima! I read about it on the Internets.


R&K

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
5. Thanks for this post. I'm still waiting for someone--anyone--to post a CREDIBLE link
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 03:37 AM
Jan 2014

that demonstrates that significant increased levels of radiation have reached North America.

You'd think that with people trying to claim that North American starfish, eagles, bees, etc. are all suffering from Fukushima radiation, they would have some...you know, EVIDENCE that there actually IS Fukushima radiation here.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»3 reasons why Fukushima h...