General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFractal Enlightenment - 13-Year Old Replicates Fibonacci Sequence to Harness Solar Power
13-Year Old Replicates Fibonacci Sequence to Harness Solar Power
http://fractalenlightenment.com/14422/fractals/13-year-old-replicates-fibonacci-sequence-to-harness-solar-power
On a trek through the forest Aidan, from Long Island, New York, pondered on how all the leaves get enough of sunlight and figured out that trees spiral up using the Fibonacci sequence.
The fractal nature of trees allows each leaf to get sunlight and he pondered on why we dont use the Fibonacci sequence in the placement of solar panels for us to harness energy from the sun.
So he came up with his little invention to generate the maximum amount of energy using the fractal principals of nature. Aidan explained, My design is like a tree, but instead of having leaves it has solar panels at the ends (of the branches).
Check out the video below -
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Good work by the young thinker, for sure, but it turned out his way of thinking led to a sub-optimal array and the math behind the theory was flawed. Neat work but the media blew this story way out of proportion.
randome
(34,845 posts)Oh, well, knowledge is king. Even the knowledge that some knowledge is not king.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)And a while bunch of blogs seem to have just picked it up again. I have no idea what triggered the new interest online.
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)resurrected the story to share with his or her readership. And that's all it takes.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Orrex
(63,185 posts)MattBaggins
(7,898 posts)Silent3
(15,177 posts)Why won't you just believe!?
dougg
(48 posts)it certainly is a start toward finding what is correct.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Solar array design is based primarily on mathematical principles, so we have calculated what should be the most efficient setup to collect sunlight. The basis of the kid's work is the Fibonacci system, which pertains to continued growth. For non-reproducing systems it is not a concept that works.
It is always possible someone manages to find something better, but the math on a static, non-replicating system is pretty clear.
MattBaggins
(7,898 posts)Hopefully this kid will pursue math and science.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,982 posts)I wonder if the cost of many PV leaves and branches will exceed the power gains compared to the power and cost reduction of producing PV cells massed in rectangular arrays.
Jimbo101
(776 posts)This story is a couple of years old & has been debunked.
http://www.treehugger.com/clean-technology/blog-debunks-13-year-olds-solar-power-breakthrough.html
7962
(11,841 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)I am also trying to restrain my inner grammar nazi
This is amazing and exciting!
icarusxat
(403 posts)it is usually followed by some republican think tank feeding stories about how it will never work, especially if it takes big energy out of the equation...
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Everyone involved gave full credit to the student for an innovative idea that just happened to not work. In this case the media is way more to blame for its coverage of his work.
icarusxat
(403 posts)Response to Coyotl (Original post)
blackspade This message was self-deleted by its author.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)dickthegrouch
(3,172 posts)He risks losing his arm if he continues to use that drill press so dangerously.
Keep up the great work in other ways.