General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat happens to people in WA and CO serving prison time for non-violent marijuana offenses?
If I were doing time for mere possession I would want out immediately.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Perhaps the governor should grant a pardon to all marijuana possession offenses.
Throd
(7,208 posts)I wonder how quickly the private prisons will be complaining about this.
Shampoobra
(423 posts)This is old news - it happened more than a year ago, after voters in Washington approved Initiative 502, but before the governor signed it into law. I know it doesn't address your specific question, but it shows an example of how the authorities here are almost all saying they just don't care about pot anymore.
November 9th, 2012
Wash. counties drop marijuana misdemeanor possession cases in light of vote
The prosecutor's offices for two Washington counties - including the one that contains Seattle - announced today they will dismiss 175 misdemeanor marijuana possession charges, days after the state's voters legalized the drug.
The dropped cases all involve arrests of individuals age 21 and older for possessing one ounce or less of marijuana.
...
"There is no point in continuing to seek criminal penalties for conduct that will be legal next month," Satterberg said in a news release.
The King County Sheriff's Office subsequently announced that, in light of the county prosecutor's decision, its deputies "will not be directed to arrest or charge individuals caught with one ounce or less of marijuana."
more at the link
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/09/washington-county-drops-marijuana-misdeanor-possession-cases-in-light-of-vote/comment-page-1/
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)So I don't know how many people are in there for simple possession, as opposed to growing or dealing. Don't get me wrong, though, I think the latter should have their sentences commuted as well.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)We are one of 22 nations that doesn't offer relief from sentencing if a law changes.
http://www.takepart.com/article/2013/01/02/no-relief-convicted
The answer: Zero on all counts.
The United States is one of only 22 countries that doesnt guarantee retroactive ameliorative relief in sentencing, says Amanda Solter, Project Director of Human Rights and Criminal Sentencing Reform Project for the University of San Francisco School of Law. The only other countries that do this are places like Myanmar, Oman, Pakistan, South Sudan, and a handful of countries in the Caribbean. Even Russia provides this right.
Though post-conviction relief varies from state-to-state in the U.S., amelioration typically needs to be explicitly specified by lawmakers for it to take effect. In a political system paralyzed by the need of candidates to appear tough on crime, this rarely happens. The Fair Sentencing Act, for instance, which passed the U.S. Congress in 2010, eases penalties for the personal possession of crack cocaine. However, even though this law was explicitly crafted to right the wrong of absurdly high sentences for crack possession in comparison with other drugs, lawmakers made no effort to ease the sentences of those already convicted.