Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,366 posts)
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 03:42 PM Jan 2014

Documents Dating Back to 1840 Intentionally Destroyed in Franklin County, N.C.

https://www.facebook.com/notes/heritage-society-of-franklin-county-nc/timeline-of-the-destruction-of-100-year-old-franklin-county-nc-records/554910501264078

Timeline of the Destruction of 100 Year Old Franklin County, NC Records

http://stumblingintheshadowsofgiants.wordpress.com/2013/12/21/160-year-old-documents-intentionally-destroyed-in-franklin-county-n-c/

This summer a new Clerk of Court in Franklin County discovered a trove (an entire roomful) of documents, some dating back to 1840, in a previously sealed room in the Franklin County, North Carolina Court House.

<snip>

- In August of this year, the Local Historians – realizing they may be beyond their depth in regard to the value of some of these materials, contacted the North Carolina Department of Archives, seeking guidance on proper preservation techniques and value assessment.

And that’s when things went hinky. The NC Archives group stepped in, pulled rank, and immediately halted all work on the project, stating that they were going to study the challenge and come up with “Next Steps”. Months passed and nothing got done, while the documents languished in the basement of the courthouse.

Then, on Friday, December 6, 2013, at 6:00 in the evening (after all the county workers had left, and with no notice to the local historical group involved in the project), a team from the North Carolina Archives swept in and confiscated ALL the materials – with the cover of Law Enforcement! They took the documents to the County Incinerator, and methodically burned EVERYTHING. They did this while a few locals stood by, not understanding why or precisely what was happening.

<snip>
53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Documents Dating Back to 1840 Intentionally Destroyed in Franklin County, N.C. (Original Post) G_j Jan 2014 OP
They would be the same Carpetbaggers that sentenced my family to sharecropping! VanillaRhapsody Jan 2014 #1
Book burner mentality. louis-t Jan 2014 #2
Exactly! liberal N proud Jan 2014 #4
louis-t, michigan is a native american word? n/t saidsimplesimon Jan 2014 #13
Stupid question, I know Kelvin Mace Jan 2014 #3
from the article, G_j Jan 2014 #6
The ancient principle of "because we say so". I'd bet that G_j has understated the case. Egalitarian Thug Jan 2014 #9
Yes, it was on the 11:00 news the night after it happened, and there is a big stink loudsue Jan 2014 #27
Ciao! Kelvin Mace Jan 2014 #32
Hi David! Doing great! Good to see you! loudsue Jan 2014 #33
We need to get together some time Kelvin Mace Jan 2014 #34
That would be great! PM me and we'll set it up! loudsue Jan 2014 #35
Is the NC Dept. of Archives an official state office? Sheldon Cooper Jan 2014 #5
Yes. blackspade Jan 2014 #22
Same thing in France. riqster Jan 2014 #7
Same thing in Ireland, same thing to the Spanish/Mexican land grants....the beat goes on. Alameda Jan 2014 #43
This is the county I live in. I knew about it at the time, and it was on the news in Raleigh, NC loudsue Jan 2014 #8
thanks, that makes sense G_j Jan 2014 #10
Informative post. Thanks. n/t Laelth Jan 2014 #39
Real Shame...lots of lost information. Historic NY Jan 2014 #11
I totally agree, and one of the historians in the county DID manage to copy a few hundred documents loudsue Jan 2014 #15
Was this health hazard documented at some level? blackspade Jan 2014 #28
And I think that is the bottom line: she didn't know shit about her actual job duties. loudsue Jan 2014 #30
what an incredible find it was, unknown for all those years. G_j Jan 2014 #40
Get to the bottom: who ordered, make them testify, sue them. Throw the book. nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #12
Two Sides or ? grilled onions Jan 2014 #14
With all the techniques available? Yes. To a county that isn't always broke. The State loudsue Jan 2014 #18
"work one wooden floor above this room" = black mold wouldn't be confined to papers -- if her El_Johns Jan 2014 #45
On Edit: I see that Loud Sue above has given an explanation.. KoKo Jan 2014 #16
Hi KoKo. Most of the fracking will start down near Lee County, and I don't know what is going on loudsue Jan 2014 #23
Thanks...Will check out your link! KoKo Jan 2014 #41
Law Enforcement DallasNE Jan 2014 #17
No. This was her own doing. She had the records hauled out and carried down to the incinerator. loudsue Jan 2014 #24
Everyone is whining about these people heaven05 Jan 2014 #19
As a genealogist, I'm completely enraged by this. kestrel91316 Jan 2014 #20
Me, too, kestrel. It's a terrible loss. loudsue Jan 2014 #25
Hopefully these documents were microfilmed JimDandy Jan 2014 #46
+1 (amateur here) n/t LittleGirl Jan 2014 #37
Yes...both Loud Sue and the Original Poster on this thread and Myself..are upset. KoKo Jan 2014 #42
This is likely a violation of NC law blackspade Jan 2014 #21
The clerk of court authorized it, and carried it out herself. loudsue Jan 2014 #26
Yep, she violated the law. blackspade Jan 2014 #29
Thank you for that information. Now that I've read that, I would assume she will be charged loudsue Jan 2014 #31
wow, just wow n/t LittleGirl Jan 2014 #36
Bizarre. k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Jan 2014 #38
North Carolina. They've gone completely insane. Kablooie Jan 2014 #44
What a shame... CFLDem Jan 2014 #47
I just finished the Grisham fiction 'Sycamore Row' in which records Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #48
Now that truly is weird. I haven't read Grisham's Sycamore Row. loudsue Jan 2014 #50
Very large best seller. Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #51
Perhaps the "North Carolina Department of Archives" kentauros Jan 2014 #49
1882-1968 there were 101 lynchings in North Carolina 86 black people,15 white people Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #52
There ought to be consequences for this. Paladin Jan 2014 #53
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
1. They would be the same Carpetbaggers that sentenced my family to sharecropping!
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 03:50 PM
Jan 2014

and who still to this day are suffering the effects of...

louis-t

(23,273 posts)
2. Book burner mentality.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 03:50 PM
Jan 2014

Keep people ignorant so you can control them. Lie to them, cheat them, don't tell them what is in their food, take away the pension they've paid into for 40 years, take away the Social Security they've paid into for 40 years, keep their pay as low as possible, fill their heads with hateful propaganda...

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
3. Stupid question, I know
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 03:51 PM
Jan 2014

but is anyone from the press covering this?

I would LOVE to know what there legal justification was. If they were in fact county records, it would be against the law to destroy them.

G_j

(40,366 posts)
6. from the article,
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 03:54 PM
Jan 2014

"No explanation has been given, and no media attention has asked any questions."

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
9. The ancient principle of "because we say so". I'd bet that G_j has understated the case.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 04:51 PM
Jan 2014

We'll never be certain, now, but I'd bet that there were documents that exposed a large number of crimes committed by now prominent families.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
27. Yes, it was on the 11:00 news the night after it happened, and there is a big stink
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:56 PM
Jan 2014

about it. But it was the CBS local news (Channel 5 WRAL).

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
33. Hi David! Doing great! Good to see you!
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 06:26 PM
Jan 2014

Hope all is well with you, too! The Happiest of the New Year to you and yours!

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
5. Is the NC Dept. of Archives an official state office?
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 03:53 PM
Jan 2014

If so, it's incredible that these documents were allowed to be destroyed. Don't state offices have specific protocols about document destruction? It certainly does seem shady.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
7. Same thing in France.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 04:43 PM
Jan 2014

The Church ran the Huguenots out of the country, and then destroyed or altered the property records to obliterate our claim to ancestral lands.

Alameda

(1,895 posts)
43. Same thing in Ireland, same thing to the Spanish/Mexican land grants....the beat goes on.
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 02:09 AM
Jan 2014

In Ireland a whole decade is missing.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
8. This is the county I live in. I knew about it at the time, and it was on the news in Raleigh, NC
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 04:47 PM
Jan 2014

which is the next county to the west of here...Raleigh is the capitol of NC. So when Franklin county Clerk of Ct. burned all the documents, it got on the local/state news.

The reason given for the burning was toxic black mold. The basement where these records were archived was wet from leaky pipes, leaking for years and years unbeknownst to those upstairs (who never ventured down to the basement), and it turned out the entire area was covered in black mold. The pages were all stuck together, wet. Moldy.

Was it handled badly? Oh hell yes. Do most stories have two sides? Yes again. The woman who had been put in charge, was put there because the former Clerk retired under a cloud of some kind, that nobody in the county is talking about. The woman who took the position was not someone who was a regular county employee, familiar with archives, etc, and was new to a power position in the county. So I think she just looked at a health issue, and figured she would fix it her own way.

Is it a large conspiracy about carpetbaggers and such? That is too far-fetched for the individual involved. She was just grossed out and worried about toxic black mold, and decided to be done with it. I suppose it was one of those "it's easier to ask for forgiveness than for permission" type of decisions.

She was going to run for the office that she took over during the next election. You can count on it that she won't be elected to that office after this stunt.

G_j

(40,366 posts)
10. thanks, that makes sense
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 04:56 PM
Jan 2014

and fills in the gaps (the kind that lead to all sorts of suspicions)
I guess the explanation was not timely. It seems like a serious enough matter for legal action.

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
11. Real Shame...lots of lost information.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 04:58 PM
Jan 2014

I have a lot of old government records under my control, many have been gone through and inventoried. My town clerk doesn't get rid of anything w/o checking on the historic value. I am one of the records management officers. Yes stuff can be destroyed but they should not have destroyed some of the vital records w/o first copying the data.

For example would you keep a 100 years of school attendance cards or 100yrs of school census records.

If they were so molded there is a process to clean them. At this point the info lost is going to haunt them. The stuff in my control is or has been all backed up on microfilm. I haven't begun to digitalize stuff but I am looking into it. We do have it backed up on various media forms.

http://www.ncdcr.gov/archives/ForGovernment/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.aspx#publichavetheright

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
15. I totally agree, and one of the historians in the county DID manage to copy a few hundred documents
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:21 PM
Jan 2014

before they were destroyed. I, personally, would NEVER have done what the new Clerk did. I would have figured out any way possible to preserve them, even if I had to hire a truck and buy one of those little pre-fab storage buildings. After what she did, she WILL be haunted for the rest of her life, in this county.

This is a small county, but played a very important part during both the revolutionary war and the civil war. Those records were irreplaceable. And they are now lost forever. Were they lost anyway? The historian that copied a few hundred documents before they were destroyed didn't think so....and she was the one who made it very public. She was in tears on the news when they reported it. Many of the other people involved, who worked around there, said the records were a serious health hazard, and support the actions of the new Clerk. It's like DU....people line up on both sides and duke it out until everyone around them is sick to death of the subject.

It is tragic for the entire county. And the biggest tragedy is that it's too late now to un-do what was done. There is no remedy.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
28. Was this health hazard documented at some level?
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:56 PM
Jan 2014

If so there should be a record of it.
Frankly, if there wasn't a complete building remediation for 'black mold' then the threat is likely overblown as mold does not contain itself to one room.
The best way to handle it would have been to remove the documents to a temp controlled facility and dry the documents out. Then you access them for value.

This is what happens when you have folks calling the shots who don't know shit about their actual job duties.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
30. And I think that is the bottom line: she didn't know shit about her actual job duties.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 06:03 PM
Jan 2014

She never worked there before she got appointed. There would have been any of a dozen better, and LESS FINAL, ways to handle it. None of which she decided on. She's toast. People are really angry about it.

grilled onions

(1,957 posts)
14. Two Sides or ?
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:11 PM
Jan 2014

On the one hand if it was unhealthy,impossible to preserve wouldn't you think that, by now, with all the techniques available that it would have never gotten to this point? On the other hand if they are trying to sweep the history under the carpet(baggers) or other shady dealings they do not realize many lived through this history and much of it was passed along as family history to many who live today. Just like book burning and other forms of trying to erase what "some" disagree with or dislike others knowing about it will come out by hook or CROOK. You can no more erase history then deny it.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
18. With all the techniques available? Yes. To a county that isn't always broke. The State
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:31 PM
Jan 2014

archives did nothing after months....so the new Clerk did what she did. If the republican-run state of NC didn't have the resources or desire to move on it, our county....which is totally broke, and in the hole....sure wouldn't have the resources to give the Clerk any $$ or employee help.

What she did was really really stupid, but it wasn't to cover up anything. This Clerk went to school with my husband, and she just isn't involved in any kind of Da Vinci code conspiracy. She has read about toxic black mold, and was likely told how much it would cost to clean it up, and since she and her cohorts work one wooden floor above this room, I think she just panicked and decided to get rid of it all. Nobody else -- State archives, county commissioners, historical society -- was doing anything to fix it.

I'm NOT excusing what she did!!! It broke my heart totally!!! I have spent YEARS in courthouses, and I find those old records invaluable.

But she had the hubris to decide for the whole county how it would be handled. And she is now paying for it, and she always will. Small towns/counties in the south are not very forgiving.

 

El_Johns

(1,805 posts)
45. "work one wooden floor above this room" = black mold wouldn't be confined to papers -- if her
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 05:19 AM
Jan 2014

worry is working above the room, maybe she'd better burn the building.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
16. On Edit: I see that Loud Sue above has given an explanation..
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:27 PM
Jan 2014

I was thinking the records could be destroyed because of Fracking interests in the area and not wanting people to look up records for land that was in dispute over the rights.

Fortunately....this sounds reasonable if it was black mold.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
23. Hi KoKo. Most of the fracking will start down near Lee County, and I don't know what is going on
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:51 PM
Jan 2014

with it this far north. I haven't heard of any landmen coming this way.

The shale that has already been located is down near Lee. That's where the fracking will start, I think.

But that is an interesting question, nonetheless.

Here a link to the page for the woman who did the burning.


http://www.nccourts.org/County/Franklin/Staff/Clerk.asp

I assure you, though...Trisha was not involved in any kind of a big conspiracy. In fact, it's mostly the local republicans who are going after her most vocally. I don't even know which way she votes, but she hasn't been active in the democratic party in our county... I've NEVER seen her at any of the meetings. Since she never ran for this office, but got appointed after the previous clerk left, it never came up whether she was Dem or Repuke.

The Tea Baggers, on the other hand, are swarming this county like killer bees. I'm sure they have their eye on this office now that Trisha is toast.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
41. Thanks...Will check out your link!
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 10:15 PM
Jan 2014

I can see where a newbie elected official would get upset over "Black Mold" and...let's face it many ...these days in NC care more for "Productivity Growth" than "Historic Preservation"...so it's the reality.

Thanks for your insight on this post.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
17. Law Enforcement
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:28 PM
Jan 2014

Was this the local Sheriff and who gave the orders? Where was the court order. And why wouldn't people have been in there with cameras and photographing these documents for backup.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
24. No. This was her own doing. She had the records hauled out and carried down to the incinerator.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:53 PM
Jan 2014

Last edited Mon Jan 6, 2014, 11:00 PM - Edit history (1)

She didn't have a court order...she's the Clerk of Court.

On edit: The sheriff's office evidently brought the hazmat (sp? ) suits, and helped take it all to the incinerator.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
19. Everyone is whining about these people
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:39 PM
Jan 2014

yet I know, for a fact, North Carolinians voted these people into office and consequently these people could appoint whomever. Snyder in michigan is the same kind of RAT!

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
42. Yes...both Loud Sue and the Original Poster on this thread and Myself..are upset.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 10:22 PM
Jan 2014

but...given it was someone who worried over the Black Mold Terror...and Human Frailty affects all of us in a tight situation...I'll go with "Loud Sue's" explanation.

I just wish this person had contacted UNC Chapel Hill or DC Historical Societies with the Smithsonian or Something to see if they could "Fumigate the Black Mold" so that this Historical Record of Importance to Franklyn County could have been recovered with New Forensic Techniques.

But...sine the Republicans have taken over our State (We went Blue for Obama..First Term) ...I figure that it was the best this woman could do ...figuring that her whole Department would come down with Asthma or something from the "Black Mold."

Still the loss to Franklyn County's Records and the loss of Esteem for this Newly Elected Woman...seem to say...maybe MORE TIME should have been taken before the distruction of the records and more resources employed by NC Historical Resources and our Proud Universities who are gifted in RECONSTRUCTION of RECORDS.

It's a sad thing..no matter the Excuses...or the Reasons. But, then it's a NEW WORLD out there. HISTORY...is about Budget Resources and nothing else... SADLY...

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
21. This is likely a violation of NC law
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:48 PM
Jan 2014

They should contact the State Archivist about the destruction.

I used to manage the destruction at a state archive over a decade ago, and there were strict guidelines for destructions and a definite paper trail.

It should be public information who authorized this.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
26. The clerk of court authorized it, and carried it out herself.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:54 PM
Jan 2014

It may well be a violation of NC law....I don't know.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
29. Yep, she violated the law.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 06:02 PM
Jan 2014

The Court Clerk is not authorized to do distructions on their own.

According to G.S. §121-5 and G.S. §132-8, state and local governmental entities may only destroy public records with the consent of the Department of Cultural Resources (DCR), the Division of Archives and Records. Retention schedules are the primary way that the Division of Archives and Records gives its consent to state and local governments to destroy their records.

Retention schedules serve as the inventory and schedule that DCR is directed by statute to provide. Retention schedules list records created and maintained by units of state and local government, and give an assessment of a records value (administrative, legal, fiscal, and/or historical) by indicating when (and if) those records should be destroyed.


http://www.ncdcr.gov/archives/ForGovernment/RetentionSchedules.aspx

Without an inventory there would have been no way to determine what could be destroyed.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
31. Thank you for that information. Now that I've read that, I would assume she will be charged
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 06:05 PM
Jan 2014

with a crime....if she is a democrat, which I don't know.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
48. I just finished the Grisham fiction 'Sycamore Row' in which records
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 10:51 AM
Jan 2014

just like these were key to uncovering a story of lynching and land grabs. I mean I just now, this morning, finished it. Life and art, they get mixed up at times.....

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
51. Very large best seller.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 11:06 AM
Jan 2014

Very well told and fictional tale, I have to wonder if those who burned these records had read the book. The book was released just ahead of the destruction of these actual records.
At any rate it is a very good book.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
49. Perhaps the "North Carolina Department of Archives"
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 11:01 AM
Jan 2014

should consider renaming themselves to the Ministry of Truth. Although, I suppose they have the same definition now, because burning everything is the exact opposite of "archiving."

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
52. 1882-1968 there were 101 lynchings in North Carolina 86 black people,15 white people
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 11:15 AM
Jan 2014

zero prosecutions.

Paladin

(28,243 posts)
53. There ought to be consequences for this.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 11:52 AM
Jan 2014

It's one thing for your crazy old uncle to torch some of your family's legal documents without permission, but it's something entirely different when state authorities do it. I wonder what the title companies and legal firms in Franklin County think about all this. I wonder if that county clerk is sleeping well at night. I hope there's a satisfactory resolution to this matter, but I'm not very hopeful.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion» Documents Dating Back to...