Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 03:17 PM Jan 2014

Orac wants you to join the Society for Science-Based Medicine

http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2014/01/07/orac-wants-you-to-join-the-society-for-science-based-medicine/

Because of my involvement in this organization, I am hijacking my own blog for one day for my own nefarious purposes. To that end, I am republishing an announcement that originally appeared yesterday at a blog that a significant fraction of you are familiar with, but nowhere near all of you. And I want all of you to know about this, because I hope that some of you will join our cause.

I’m also going to add a few words of my own, because I can’t help it. (As Hans Solo once said, “Hey, it’s me.”) The reason this new organization, the Society for Science-Based Medicine, is so needed is because, quite frankly, in the skeptical movement SBM is but one area of many areas of concern, and, in my estimation, one that doesn’t receive attention proportional to the real societal damage done by quackery. That has changed a bit (this year’s TAM featured two talks on Stanislaw Burzynski, and the skeptical movement has shown a gratifying movement towards combatting the antivaccine movement over the last few years), but, even so, I don’t think I exaggerate too much when I say that, even now, SBM tends not to be as prominent a concern in organized skepticism as other brands of pseudoscience and unreason, in particular creationism, religion, and the paranormal. This viewpoint should be nothing new to regular readers of this blog; I’ve made no secret of my opinion. It should also come as no surprise that I tend not to be an anti-theism warrior, if ever I was. I’m perfectly happy to let others fight that battle. These days, the only time I ever address such issues tends to be when they intersect with medicine, as in the case of Sarah Hershberger or Christian Science believers using prayer instead of medicine to treat diabetes in children. Nor should it surprise anyone that I write much less about evolution and the paranormal than I used to do back in the early years of this blog, although I do still occasionally wander back to revisit those territories from time to time, particularly when evolution intersects with medicine, as it does so much in cancer.

No, these days I’ve pretty much specialized, and that’s what’s needed in medicine, a specialization in promoting science and combatting pseudoscience in medicine, hence the need for a new organization. SBM and how pseudomedicine threatens public health are my main topics now. The harm pseudomedicine does is undeniable; it is direct and indirect; and it is often immediate. Worse, as I’ve described time and time again, both here and at my not-so-super-secret other blog, it is invading and metastasizing throughout the field of medicine, in particular in medical academia, a phenomenon I like to refer to as quackademic medicine. Those of us who try to slow or block the rise of pseudomedicine are scattered, outgunned, underfunded, and beset by a profound apathy in the medical profession, also known as the “shruggie” phenomenon. It’s a rag tag band against Dr Oz and his media empire. Skeptical organizations, on the other hand, have segments of their membership who are interested in combatting quackery, but they tend to lack the expertise, with relatively few physicians and other medical professionals available. The problem is that so few physicians actually know what “complementary and alternative medicine” is, why “integrative medicine” is the “integration” of pseudoscience with SBM, and what the basis of much of CAM really is, and fewer still have an interest in skepticism.

A new organization is needed to counter unreason and pseudoscience in medicine. That is why the Society for Science-Based Medicine is being founded. That is why I want you to join us.

For more details, please read Mark Crislip’s announcement and, if the idea of such an organization appeals to you, join:


We are proud to announce a new organization: The Society for Science-Based Medicine.
A Society for a community of like-minded individuals, both in and out of health care, who support the goals of Science-Based Medicine.

People should not suffer, die, go bankrupt, and lose time and hope because of complementary and alternative pseudo-medicine.

The mission of the Society for Science-Based Medicine includes, but is not limited to,

1 Educating consumers, professionals, business people, legislators, law enforcement personnel, organizations and agencies about Science-Based Medicine.

2 Providing resources and information for information concerning all aspects of Science-Based Medicine.

3 Providing a central resource for communication between individuals and organizations concerned about Science-Based Medicine.

4 Supporting sound consumer health laws for the practice of Science-Base Medicine and opposing legislation that undermines Science-Based Medicine.

5 Encouraging and aiding legal actions in support of the practice of Science-Based Medicine.





Sid
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Orac wants you to join the Society for Science-Based Medicine (Original Post) SidDithers Jan 2014 OP
kick. vaht? vaz you shaying shumthing.. about woo... to meeee? dionysus Jan 2014 #1
I am a huge Mark Crislip fan. longship Jan 2014 #2
Since I now work in Nursing, I believe I shall join. MattBaggins Jan 2014 #3
And done MattBaggins Jan 2014 #4
Awesome... SidDithers Jan 2014 #7
The Friend of the Amazing Randi? Octafish Jan 2014 #5
Not nearly as much money as the JFK conspiracy industry...nt SidDithers Jan 2014 #6
Las Vegas - Southpoint Hotel and Casino Octafish Jan 2014 #8
I've never seen a video of it, so I can't be 100% certain... SidDithers Jan 2014 #9
Whoa! If that's not proof of clairvoyance, I'd like to know what is. Orrex Jan 2014 #17
I hear Randi finally came out, he must be nearly 90 but he finally stopped lying Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #13
The Medical and Science Community was so bigoted when i was young that I will Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #10
A lot has changed in the last 40 years...nt SidDithers Jan 2014 #11
What specifically did they change that would make them less prone to such pernicious error? Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #14
"Bookmarking" for payday! etherealtruth Jan 2014 #12
Thanks for posting this. GoneOffShore Jan 2014 #15
SSBM eShirl Jan 2014 #16

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
9. I've never seen a video of it, so I can't be 100% certain...
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 04:16 PM
Jan 2014

but I'm going to go out on a limb and say it's a hotel and casino.

Sid

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
13. I hear Randi finally came out, he must be nearly 90 but he finally stopped lying
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 04:47 PM
Jan 2014

That old fuck. He used to stand there with the 'gay is a disease' people and nod along with them which is why I have never respected him.
At least he finally found the courage and honesty to do what most of us do in our much younger years.
Better late than never, I guess. So much harm he did with his cowardice.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
10. The Medical and Science Community was so bigoted when i was young that I will
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 04:36 PM
Jan 2014

always take what they say with a grain of salt the size of a Toyota. They claimed 'evidence' showed that being gay was a disease, which they sought to cure. They did this not in the 1800's, but in the 20th Century, until the 1970's. That ignorance lead them to be utterly unprepared for the greatest health crisis of our time, and that cost thousands of lives.
Grain of salt because like Marcus Bachmann, 'Science' said gay was a sickness and they could cure it, for a fee.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
14. What specifically did they change that would make them less prone to such pernicious error?
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 04:57 PM
Jan 2014

They held that bigotry as if it was 'science' for about 150 years. Maybe in a century we can drop the grain.
40 years is not that long, James Randi is mentioned in this thread. He's old enough to have been teaching his 'Science Based is always right' sermon in the 70's. He was gay then too, trust me. But he did not boldly counter the bullshit 'Science' was spouting, oh no, and now he refuses to talk about that. He never lifted a finger to counter the Superstition posing as Science then, when it counted and when it would have taken personal courage from him. Now he showboats as 'skeptic' but then he nodded along as accomplice.
Some doctor in CA just recently listed 'chronic homosexuality' as a diagnosis for a patient. That sort of ignorance does not simply vanish, and none of those who took part in the worst days did a thing to correct what they'd done.
Like Marcus Bachmann, only they called it 'Medical Science' and then poked out the frontal lobe as 'treatment for homosexuality'.
Grain of salt. Too dangerous to think otherwise. They did lobotomies, to 'cure the gay'. Big giant grain of science flavored salt.

GoneOffShore

(17,336 posts)
15. Thanks for posting this.
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 05:10 PM
Jan 2014

I've always been a fan of Orac over at Science Blogs. And his Respectful Insolence is a great read.

He's an excellent skewer-er of the anti-vax, anti-pharma, "they're hiding the cures from us", "fill in the blank" CURES CANCER crowd.

And in the cold, woo filled winter he is a comfort.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Orac wants you to join th...