Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fuck the gap incorporated I never shopped at their stores before but now I will openly oppose them (Original Post) Arcanetrance Jan 2014 OP
PETA? Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #1
So the suffering of animals having their fur ripped from them while alive should be discounted Arcanetrance Jan 2014 #2
As I said, I wouldn't sign any petition from that whacked out org. Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #3
If you click the link there's a video for you to watch and given the fashion industries Arcanetrance Jan 2014 #5
Anything that PETA endorses Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #7
Would you believe the Animal Liberation Front? Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #26
They're even nuttier than PETA. Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #27
They are more radical, that is for sure. But they are also very serious about animal liberation. Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #28
Dude... stop being a Republican. Fawke Em Jan 2014 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #10
How do we know what's true coming from someone who enjoys killing? LanternWaste Jan 2014 #30
When did I say I enjoy killing? Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #31
So you enjoy killing animals for sport, eh? Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #4
No, I shoot animals to feed me and my wife. Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #6
I have no problem with that Fawke Em Jan 2014 #11
I'm always open for new recipes. Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #12
I suppose a properly placed rifle round is superior to a slaughterhouse. Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #13
That's the problem with PETA, Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #14
The right to kill another animal really only should exist in a state of absolute need. Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #16
And I'm not slaughtering animals unnessarily, Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #17
You're killing another living creature with an at least marginal level of intelligence. Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #19
Obviously, we're poles apart on this. Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #21
Also, my wife and I each shoot an xtra elk or deer Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #18
I hear the charity argument a lot and it doesn't really make much of a difference. Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #20
We do maintain a garden, Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #22
Well, that's certainly excellent. Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #23
You may think it doesn't make much of a difference, Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #24
I'm saying it makes no difference to the argument for animal rights. Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #25
Not everyone personifies animals. nt Deep13 Jan 2014 #9
Personhood is not a uniquely human trait. So what you should really be saying is... Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #15
And the word you were looking for is anthropomorphise. Egalitarian Thug Jan 2014 #29
Do you have a reliable source and whistler162 Jan 2014 #32
The PETA site is the one that has the link to the petition I don't get the hatred for PETA Arcanetrance Jan 2014 #33
Not hatred, but profound disdain. Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #34
That bothers me and I'd like to know why they had the animals put to sleep maybe they had health Arcanetrance Jan 2014 #35
Look, Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #36
Well I'm not a fan of them going after people who hunt for food I do hate trophy hunters Arcanetrance Jan 2014 #37
I too, hate trophy hunters, Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #38
 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
1. PETA?
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:30 AM
Jan 2014

Sorry, as an active hunter, I have ZERO respect for PETA.
I wouldn't sign anything from that whacked out org.

Arcanetrance

(2,670 posts)
2. So the suffering of animals having their fur ripped from them while alive should be discounted
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:33 AM
Jan 2014

Cause the link for the petition came from peta

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
3. As I said, I wouldn't sign any petition from that whacked out org.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:35 AM
Jan 2014

And, coming from an org. that's been caught in lie after lie, how do you know this is true?

Arcanetrance

(2,670 posts)
5. If you click the link there's a video for you to watch and given the fashion industries
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:41 AM
Jan 2014

love for animal cruelty it definitely seems credible

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
7. Anything that PETA endorses
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:44 AM
Jan 2014

I take with a GREAT BIG GRAIN OF SALT.
I don't believe a word PETA says anymore.

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
27. They're even nuttier than PETA.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 03:28 AM
Jan 2014

I remember when they "freed" a bunch of minks in Ohio, who then ended up getting killed by predators or being run over by vehicles.

But, this is my own opinion.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
28. They are more radical, that is for sure. But they are also very serious about animal liberation.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 03:36 AM
Jan 2014

Whereas PETA is very often nothing more than a funnel for money.

The ALF suffers under the shortcomings of many other anarchist groups in that they sometimes participate in ill-structured and ill-informed activities. Although that alone is not a very sound condemnation. Especially considering their motivation and their considerable success.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
8. Dude... stop being a Republican.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:45 AM
Jan 2014

You know... stop NOT listening to the other side, even when it's not what you want to hear.

Response to Fawke Em (Reply #8)

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
30. How do we know what's true coming from someone who enjoys killing?
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 10:02 AM
Jan 2014

How do we know what's true coming from someone who enjoys killing?

(Six of one, half a dozen of the other. Insert rationalization here)

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
31. When did I say I enjoy killing?
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 11:06 AM
Jan 2014

What I enjoy is the taste of lean, none steroid filled meat, I enjoy knowing that I'm not contributing to those horrible factory farms that raise and butcher the animals in cruel and inhumane conditions.

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
6. No, I shoot animals to feed me and my wife.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:42 AM
Jan 2014

Much better than that store bought, steroid/chemical filled, factory farmed meat.
And I never said anything about shooting animals for sport, that's on you.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
11. I have no problem with that
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:47 AM
Jan 2014

Unless you ask me to dress it..

You do that, too. I'll cook it. In spices.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
13. I suppose a properly placed rifle round is superior to a slaughterhouse.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:49 AM
Jan 2014

However, groups like PETA don't give much of a shit about your preference for different types of meat. They are incorporated veganism. Their philosophy, like many animal liberationists, revolves around establishing the right to life and the right to remain free from cruelty for most or all animals.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
16. The right to kill another animal really only should exist in a state of absolute need.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:55 AM
Jan 2014

Otherwise, you're giving up other options that could avoid slaughter. While I am a hypocrite and eat meat, I do so with the understanding that what I'm doing isn't of great moral fortitude. I certainly won't acknowledge that any person has a definable right to slaughter other animals unnecessarily.

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
17. And I'm not slaughtering animals unnessarily,
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 03:01 AM
Jan 2014

I'm shooting unmolested meat that is much healthier to eat, are not raised and butchered in horrible, inhumane conditions.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
19. You're killing another living creature with an at least marginal level of intelligence.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 03:06 AM
Jan 2014

As I've said, a properly placed rifle round is likely a more humane way of slaughter than many of the other options animals suffer under. However, that doesn't mean it's ethical. That just means it's less unethical.

The only way your hunting is justifiable is if you quite literally have no other option to live meat free. And, while there is always the possibility such an issue exists, I suspect this is not the case.

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
21. Obviously, we're poles apart on this.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 03:10 AM
Jan 2014

One thing I will never do is apologize, or change my way of hunting, so, let's just leave it at that.
I get it, you think hunting is immoral, while I think it's a healthier lifestyle.

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
18. Also, my wife and I each shoot an xtra elk or deer
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 03:04 AM
Jan 2014

and donate it to the local food bank or shelter and they are damned glad for the meat to feed the less fortunate.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
20. I hear the charity argument a lot and it doesn't really make much of a difference.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 03:09 AM
Jan 2014

For instance, you could maintain a garden and donate the vegetables.

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
24. You may think it doesn't make much of a difference,
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 03:14 AM
Jan 2014

but try telling that to those that are the beneficiaries of our donations.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
25. I'm saying it makes no difference to the argument for animal rights.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 03:17 AM
Jan 2014

Obviously, your charitable donation makes a difference. Whether such a difference justifies the killing of an animal is an argument of means and ends.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
15. Personhood is not a uniquely human trait. So what you should really be saying is...
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:51 AM
Jan 2014

"Some people refuse to acknowledge real personhood in other animals."

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
29. And the word you were looking for is anthropomorphise.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 07:36 AM
Jan 2014

to ascribe human form or attributes to (an animal, plant, material object, etc.).

Arcanetrance

(2,670 posts)
33. The PETA site is the one that has the link to the petition I don't get the hatred for PETA
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 12:21 PM
Jan 2014

Why is it a hack site?

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
34. Not hatred, but profound disdain.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 12:32 PM
Jan 2014

PETA is a radical animals rights org who lies and constantly ridicules legitimate hunters.
I remember this little tidbit.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathan-j-winograd/peta-kills-puppies-kittens_b_2979220.html


Warning: Some of the following graphic photos may distress the reader.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is an organization that publicly claims to represent the best interest of animals -- indeed their "ethical treatment." Yet approximately 2,000 animals pass through PETA's front door every year and very few make it out alive. The vast majority -- 96 percent in 2011 -- exit the facility out the back door after they have been killed, when Pet Cremation Services of Tidewater stops by on their regular visits to pick up their remains. Between these visits, the bodies are stored in the giant walk-in freezer PETA installed for this very purpose. It is a freezer that cost $9,370 and, like the company which incinerates the bodies of PETA's victims, was paid for with the donations of animal lovers who could never have imagined that the money they donated to help animals would be used to end their lives instead. In fact, in the last 11 years, PETA has killed 29,426 dogs, cats, rabbits, and other domestic animals.

Most animal lovers find this hard to believe. But seeing is believing. And if it is true that a picture speaks a thousand words, the following images speak volumes about who and what PETA really stands for.





Why should I take this org. seriously?

Arcanetrance

(2,670 posts)
35. That bothers me and I'd like to know why they had the animals put to sleep maybe they had health
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 12:45 PM
Jan 2014

problems I don't know. But I would like someone to look into why that's happened. As far as the rabbits go I read a few different places about this happening it wasn't just PETA. As of right now the only petition I found is through PETA that's why I posted it. Personally I have had no real opinion on PETA past they waste money on celebrity ad campaigns that I feel could better be used to help animals.

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
36. Look,
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 12:52 PM
Jan 2014

I know that PETA does expose what goes on with these factory farms and the inhumane conditions, I applaud them for that, but they constantly shoot themselves in the foot, (no pun intended) when they ridicule and condemn legitimate hunters and, pull the kind of shit in my previous post.

I agree, PETA should concentrate on the injustices done to animals, ie, factory farms and animal cruelty, not going after people like me, legitimate hunters who eat what they hunt or donate to the less fortunate.

Jeez, I hope this makes sense, long night last night.

Arcanetrance

(2,670 posts)
37. Well I'm not a fan of them going after people who hunt for food I do hate trophy hunters
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 12:57 PM
Jan 2014

Personally I've seen the inside of slaughterhouses and worked in butchering and processing hunting is a much more humane way to go. I know that's not what anyone expects me to say but there's my odd two cents

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
38. I too, hate trophy hunters,
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 01:01 PM
Jan 2014

they give legitimate hunters a bad reputation, my wife made it clear early on that she won't put up with deer racks hung above the fireplace, and I agreed, I think that's gross.

I do believe that we have more in common than either of us realize.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fuck the gap incorporated...