Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spanone

(135,822 posts)
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 07:16 PM Jan 2014

Jobless aid bill hits snag over price tag --- repug senators hold unemployed hostage

bipartisan MY ASS.


Republicans who helped keep a bill to restore long-term jobless aid alive earlier this week say they won't stay on Democrats' side unless the legislation's backers find a way to pay for the $6.4 billion program.

Sens. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, and Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., were two of the six Republicans who gave Democrats enough votes to begin debate on the extension. But at a news conference Wednesday, both said they won't vote to advance the bill any further unless the extension's cost is offset.

The unemployment insurance legislation faces one more 60-vote hurdle before it could pass. That means that, without backing from Portman and Ayotte, it's all but doomed.

Ayotte is proposing a way to pay for the program - and fulfill some other GOP wishlist items -- by closing a tax loophole she says helps undocumented immigrants commit fraud, but that plan hasn't gained traction with Democrats.

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/08/22231135-jobless-aid-bill-hits-snag-over-price-tag?lite

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jobless aid bill hits snag over price tag --- repug senators hold unemployed hostage (Original Post) spanone Jan 2014 OP
Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #1
how about we offset it by NOT subsidizing major oil companies? spanone Jan 2014 #2
Or build 2 fewer ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #3
But might not in terms of amount of $. Igel Jan 2014 #6
What is the "carried forward loophole"? badtoworse Jan 2014 #7
They've conveniently forgotten the cost of their shutdown, over $24 billion. LiberalEsto Jan 2014 #4
bingo! spanone Jan 2014 #8
These very bastards have no problem borrowing 800 million a week from China rustydog Jan 2014 #5
Spending cuts? Start with $900Billion in bloated defense budgets that could go. JaneyVee Jan 2014 #9
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
1. Well ...
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 07:39 PM
Jan 2014

Ayotte has the right idea. While I don't know which tax loop hole she is referring to that helps undocumented immigrants commit fraud, I know that it, if it exists, would pale in comparison to closing the "carried forward" loop hole.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
6. But might not in terms of amount of $.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 09:46 PM
Jan 2014

Here's the claim. Google to your heart's content and figure out if it's a biased claim. Too much dreck to wade though, and what I waded through I did only because I thought, "Odd that nobody's saying what the claim is."

The claim is simple. If you are a tax filer you can file and get a refundable income tax credit for each of your dependent kids. We have 1 kid, Mrs. Igel and I, and do this annually.

However, while a number of entitlements (and I view this as an entitlement, since it's funded by Congress and only available to me because the law says I'm entitled to it) are available only to those possessing SSNs, this one is available to all tax filers.

Many tax filers use an individual taxpayer ID number, or "ITIN" (to use the jargon). While a legitimate form of taxpayer ID number, the claim is--echoed, it would seem, by IRS staffers, that many illegal immigrants use them. And are able to claim their kids, legally US citizens or not, as dependents. Thus obtaining refundable tax credits even if they're poor and pay no income tax (after refunds or otherwise). This totals to a small number of billions of dollars. Not $10 billion. But more, they claim, than $3. So it's roughly ballpark to the unemployment benefits funding number, even if one is for 3 months and the other for the year.

Red meat for conservatives. Masquerading as kamut and organically grown quinoa.

It strikes me as mildly specious that the claim is that the "children can be living in Mexico!" but from personal experience you have to show that your kids have a SSN. My only hesitation on using this as counterevidence is that I don't know if kids can get ITINs or not, that is, if there's a way for a non-citizen minor to qualify.

The EITC is also in the mix, but it gets added after all the evidence is adduced. Sort of on a "free ride program" of its own.

 

LiberalEsto

(22,845 posts)
4. They've conveniently forgotten the cost of their shutdown, over $24 billion.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 08:05 PM
Jan 2014

That would have paid for at least 3 extensions of long term unemployment benefits.

rustydog

(9,186 posts)
5. These very bastards have no problem borrowing 800 million a week from China
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 09:11 PM
Jan 2014

to continue the 10+ year war on terra....
Bastards

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jobless aid bill hits sna...