Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,984 posts)
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 11:15 AM Jan 2014

The Millionaires Club: For 1st time in history-More Than 1/2 House & Senate Members=Millionaires


The Millionaires Club
For the first time in history, more than half the members of the House and Senate are millionaires, OpenSecrets found.

"Of 534 current members of Congress, at least 268 had an average net worth of $1 million or more in 2012... The median net worth for the 530 current lawmakers who were in Congress as of the May filing deadline was $1,008,767 -- an increase from last year when it was $966,000."
https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2014/01/millionaires-club-for-first-time-most-lawmakers-are-worth-1-million-plus.html
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Millionaires Club: For 1st time in history-More Than 1/2 House & Senate Members=Millionaires (Original Post) kpete Jan 2014 OP
Bravo! They certainly deserve it. Such hard working, dedicated public servants. Kablooie Jan 2014 #1
And those who aren't... woo me with science Jan 2014 #2
The real number is very close to 100%. These so-called disclosures are worse than a joke. Egalitarian Thug Jan 2014 #3
They use the same scale as for the unemployment numbers. nt woo me with science Jan 2014 #5
LOL! I just knew there was something familiar about that scale... Egalitarian Thug Jan 2014 #6
I will say it's MUCH easier to be a millionaire today... Adrahil Jan 2014 #4
Well, they're called the House of Representatives because they represent the people. jsr Jan 2014 #7
Because they represent the house. Orsino Jan 2014 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2014 #8
Interesting ProSense Jan 2014 #10
as I have been saying for a long time... Javaman Jan 2014 #11
kick woo me with science Jan 2014 #12

Kablooie

(18,626 posts)
1. Bravo! They certainly deserve it. Such hard working, dedicated public servants.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 11:20 AM
Jan 2014


I don't have to put the sarcasm thingy here, do I?
 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
3. The real number is very close to 100%. These so-called disclosures are worse than a joke.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 11:31 AM
Jan 2014

Some kind DUer looked up and used Nancy Pelosi's (I assume it was a previous version) that lists her as being "worth" somewhere between $8M and $181M... Now, that's quite an estimate!

Let me see here, I might have $100 in my wallet, but it might be $2,300, I'm not sure and it's basically the same, right?

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
4. I will say it's MUCH easier to be a millionaire today...
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 11:33 AM
Jan 2014

.... I mean, I'm not really "rich" but I calculate that I'll be paper "millionaire" in a little over 5 years.... faster if my house goes up in value significantly.

Don't get me wrong. I'm comfortable, but I'm not Daddy Warbucks comfortable.

Response to kpete (Original post)

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
10. Interesting
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 01:00 PM
Jan 2014
<...>

This methodological change (to a system the Senate already uses) also appeared to affect Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine). On her disclosure form covering 2010, she reported having an average net worth of $750,000. Then in 2011 she married hedge fund manager Donald Sussman, which increased her average net worth for that year to $85.8 million. Her report for 2012 shows a dramatic decline, to $42.4 million, because of the new reporting rules.

The least wealthy member of Congress in 2012, at least on paper, was Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.) -- a slot he occupied the previous year as well. Valdao reported an average net worth of negative $12.1 million in 2012. That's actually a big improvement from 2011, when his average net worth was negative $19 million. According to Valdao's disclosure forms and our interviews with his staff last year, his debt is the result of loans for his family dairy farm.

The second-poorest member of Congress continued to be Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.), who for decades has owed millions of dollars for legal bills incurred in the 1980s, when he was charged with accepting a bribe while sitting as a federal judge. As we noted last year, Hastings was acquitted, but later impeached and removed by the Senate before running for Congress in 1992. His level of debt has not changed since 2005.

Although more members of Congress are millionaires than ever before, and the median net worth for all lawmakers is higher than ever, their total net worth -- the value of all their assets minus liabilities -- fell from $4.2 billion in 2011 to $3.9 billion in 2012. Again, that could be at least partly due to the change in the House reporting requirements for spousal assets and liabilities.

<...>

In 2012, was Valadao really the "least wealthy member of Congress"?

Net Worth, 2012

(by poorest)
http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/overview.php?type=W&year=2012&filter=H&sort=A (House)
http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/overview.php?type=W&year=2012&filter=S&sort=A (Senate)

(by richest)
http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/overview.php?type=W&year=2012&filter=H&sort=D (House)
http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/overview.php?type=W&year=2012&filter=S (Senate)

Javaman

(62,517 posts)
11. as I have been saying for a long time...
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 01:33 PM
Jan 2014

most if not all our members of congress have zero concept of what it's like to live and survive in the US on a middle class, lower class and poverty level income.

if there is anyone, it's about only 1% of congress that can actually empathize. And that's the only 1% in this nation that I believe in. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren come to mind.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Millionaires Club: Fo...