Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why does everyone think that released NJ documents will come without pertinent information (Original Post) mfcorey1 Jan 2014 OP
Because Wisniewski JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #1
These documents were edited or redacted in order to encourage an offer of immunity to Wildstein Gothmog Jan 2014 #2
How did you do that? JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #3

JustAnotherGen

(31,781 posts)
1. Because Wisniewski
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 03:48 PM
Jan 2014

Knows what is in them. . .
http://www.local10.com/news/politics/More-details-coming-in-Christie-bridge-scandal/-/1895020/23863970/-/wrbrpa/-/index.html

The 907 pages of documents to be released Friday were collected under a subpoena issued to Wildstein.

They are expected to be posted to a state website midmorning, according to a committee spokesman.

While the documents could be revelatory, the committee's chairman, Assemblyman John Wisniewski, accused Christie of still holding back.

"We intend to continue our investigation, but this would all be made easier if Gov. Christie did the right thing and voluntarily released all communications so everyone could find out with certainty what happened," Wisniewski said in a statement. "If he's truly dedicated to transparency and the truth from here on out, he will take this step and cooperate fully with the committee's work."


He's the same man who kept asking "whose Charlie" and was rather po'd that Wildstein kept taking the 5th on the most basic of questions. I don't always agree with him on legislation - but he's pretty much a Democratic stalwart here.


I want to see what John has seen. His questions will make more sense. I think the Assembly gave Christie just enough rope to hang himself yesterday.

Gothmog

(144,920 posts)
2. These documents were edited or redacted in order to encourage an offer of immunity to Wildstein
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 04:01 PM
Jan 2014

I have read the documents that were leaked. It is clear to me that Wildstein and his attorney redacted or edited these documents to encourage someone to offer immunity.

Wildstein's attorney is doing what any criminal defense attorney would do. He has released just enough information to encourage an offer of immunity. I am convinced that there is more in these documents that will hurt Christie and Wildstein is willing to throw Christie under the bus for a grant of immunity

JustAnotherGen

(31,781 posts)
3. How did you do that?
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 04:19 PM
Jan 2014

Exhibit A is a 189 MB - it's still downloading for me!

Exhibit F downloaded though - it's got Wildstein's name right in it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why does everyone think t...