Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCharles Pierce on Brian Schweitzer: Montana's Wild Hack
Pierce liked Schweitzer as a governor (you can search the site for that), but has this to say about the recent talk of him and the presidency:
Schweitzer wants a single-payer health-care system. Hell, so do I. I also would like to be High King Of Ireland. Neither is going to happen in my lifetime. However, Schweitzer also wants the Keystone XL pipeline, and that very probably is going to happen some time in the next year. So, we have support for something the Democratic base loves but that has no practical chance of happening, and also support for something the base hates that might happen just as the campaign is gearing up. Schweitzer is good on the NSA, but is not now in position to do anything about it. But he's also bad on guns, and that's the current status quo that the base hates. All of the issues with which Schweitzer appeals to the Democratic base involve policy proposals that are at best the rosy dreams of progressive bell-ringers. All the issues with which Schweitzer will anger the base are either already in place, or very likely to be that way soon. I would not like to craft a stump speech in which my candidate has to promise to one day, on the great gettin' up morning, bring us a single-payer health-care system and, at the same time, defend a death-funnel already under construction in opposition to which ranchers and Nebraska grannies are being hauled off to the pokey. Schweitzer is a likable, fascinating guy. But, for the moment at least, he's the guy who rails against the NSA, about which he can do nothing, but not against the NRA, against which he could. That's not a good mix.
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/brian-schweitzer-2016-run-011514
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/brian-schweitzer-2016-run-011514
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1957 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Charles Pierce on Brian Schweitzer: Montana's Wild Hack (Original Post)
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2014
OP
frazzled
(18,402 posts)1. He wouldn't appeal to either liberals or conservatives
The idea that he could be a successful candidate is rather preposterous. Each side would find some position he holds to be a non-starter. For me, it's guns. Total disqualifying position. For a conservative, it would be, say, the pinko commie predilection for a single-payer health system (unlikely as that would be to occur).
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)2. DU rec...
the sudden love directed toward Schweitzer over the last couple of days reminds me of all the Darcy Richardson posts from that Hart2008 guy.
Sid
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)4. I miss that goofy troll. nt
zappaman
(20,606 posts)7. You better believe it! n/t
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)3. Cold Truth, Sir....
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)5. How do the other potential candidates fare on the same issues?
I'm not a Schweitzer fan on some issues but I haven't heard what the other potential candidates have to say about them either.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)6. Perfect!
grantcart
(53,061 posts)8. He coulda been a contender