Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,311 posts)
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 11:58 AM Jan 2014

Charles Pierce on Brian Schweitzer: Montana's Wild Hack

Pierce liked Schweitzer as a governor (you can search the site for that), but has this to say about the recent talk of him and the presidency:

Schweitzer wants a single-payer health-care system. Hell, so do I. I also would like to be High King Of Ireland. Neither is going to happen in my lifetime. However, Schweitzer also wants the Keystone XL pipeline, and that very probably is going to happen some time in the next year. So, we have support for something the Democratic base loves but that has no practical chance of happening, and also support for something the base hates that might happen just as the campaign is gearing up. Schweitzer is good on the NSA, but is not now in position to do anything about it. But he's also bad on guns, and that's the current status quo that the base hates. All of the issues with which Schweitzer appeals to the Democratic base involve policy proposals that are at best the rosy dreams of progressive bell-ringers. All the issues with which Schweitzer will anger the base are either already in place, or very likely to be that way soon. I would not like to craft a stump speech in which my candidate has to promise to one day, on the great gettin' up morning, bring us a single-payer health-care system and, at the same time, defend a death-funnel already under construction in opposition to which ranchers and Nebraska grannies are being hauled off to the pokey. Schweitzer is a likable, fascinating guy. But, for the moment at least, he's the guy who rails against the NSA, about which he can do nothing, but not against the NRA, against which he could. That's not a good mix.

http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/brian-schweitzer-2016-run-011514
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Charles Pierce on Brian Schweitzer: Montana's Wild Hack (Original Post) muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 OP
He wouldn't appeal to either liberals or conservatives frazzled Jan 2014 #1
DU rec... SidDithers Jan 2014 #2
I miss that goofy troll. nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #4
You better believe it! n/t zappaman Jan 2014 #7
Cold Truth, Sir.... The Magistrate Jan 2014 #3
How do the other potential candidates fare on the same issues? Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2014 #5
Perfect! ProSense Jan 2014 #6
He coulda been a contender grantcart Jan 2014 #8

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
1. He wouldn't appeal to either liberals or conservatives
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 12:05 PM
Jan 2014

The idea that he could be a successful candidate is rather preposterous. Each side would find some position he holds to be a non-starter. For me, it's guns. Total disqualifying position. For a conservative, it would be, say, the pinko commie predilection for a single-payer health system (unlikely as that would be to occur).

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
2. DU rec...
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 12:08 PM
Jan 2014

the sudden love directed toward Schweitzer over the last couple of days reminds me of all the Darcy Richardson posts from that Hart2008 guy.

Sid

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
5. How do the other potential candidates fare on the same issues?
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 03:46 PM
Jan 2014

I'm not a Schweitzer fan on some issues but I haven't heard what the other potential candidates have to say about them either.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Charles Pierce on Brian S...