Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 11:59 AM Jan 2014

Rachel Maddow Takes Chris Christie Scandal to Washington Post w/ Op/Ed on Local Reporting

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/rachel-maddow-nj-bridge-scandal-proves-the-need-for-dogged-local-journalism/2014/01/15/56ba6ab0-7c77-11e3-93c1-0e888170b723_story.html

Democracy needs dogged local journalism

By Rachel Maddow, Published: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 15, 8:55 PM ET

If you type “Shawn Boburg” into your Web browser address bar, a strange thing happens. Boburg is a reporter for The Record newspaper, in Bergen County, N.J. But ShawnBoburg.com sends visitors to The Record’s rival, Newark’s Star-Ledger.

The man who bought the rights to Boburg’s online name — and who presumably engineered the nasty little redirect — is David Wildstein, who last week became the country’s most high-profile political appointee. After his high school classmate Chris Christie was elected governor of New Jersey in 2009, Wildstein was appointed to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey for a highly paid position that, conveniently, had no job description.

- snip -

Christie’s spokesman forwarded to Wildstein an e-mail exchange with a Star-Ledger reporter who was inquiring about the scandal, calling the reporter an “(expletive)ing mutt.” After a request for comment came in from a member of the Star-Ledger editorial board, the governor’s spokesman erupted to Wildstein, “(expletive) him and the S-L.”

While the Christie appointees at the Port Authority asserted “no response” over and over to reporters’ requests for information, the governor publicly belittled journalists who had the temerity to ask him about the scandal. “I worked the cones, actually,” Christie scoffed in December, referring to the purported traffic study. “Unbeknownst to everybody, I was actually the guy out there. . . . You really are not serious with that question.”

- snip -

The first reporting on the scandal was by the local traffic columnist in The Record, John Cichowski. The week of the traffic tie-ups, Cichowski was already calling bullpucky on the Port Authority line that some sort of “study” was to blame. He pointed to political retribution as a more likely explanation. A steady stream of local reporting followed until, ultimately, Shawn Boburg’s scoop last Wednesday in The Record: the governor’s deputy chief of staff e-mailing Wildstein, “Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee.

MORE AT LINK
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rachel Maddow Takes Chris Christie Scandal to Washington Post w/ Op/Ed on Local Reporting (Original Post) Hissyspit Jan 2014 OP
big kick crazylikafox Jan 2014 #1
she's right warrior1 Jan 2014 #2
Keep putting it out there, Rachel! calimary Jan 2014 #3
Boburg and the Bergen Record deserve a Pulitzer Prize for their coverage of this scandal. George II Jan 2014 #4
The most important part of the piece athena Jan 2014 #5
Great thanks also to Ken Ward Jr. Of the Charleston Gazette Sienna86 Jan 2014 #6
knr Douglas Carpenter Jan 2014 #7
Rachel Maddow's point is that we should subscribe to our local newspaper. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #8
The problem is that many people don't think about the cost of news. athena Jan 2014 #10
I subscribe to Mother Jones. Someone gives me copies of the NYT. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #11
Rachel's dead serious on exposing CChristie and his Culture of Cha Jan 2014 #9

warrior1

(12,325 posts)
2. she's right
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 12:13 PM
Jan 2014

All politics are locate. Thanks to intrepid reporting and not afraid of the bully in NJ. From what I've been reading there are a lot of them.

calimary

(81,220 posts)
3. Keep putting it out there, Rachel!
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 01:33 PM
Jan 2014

Keep spreading the word! The more vehicles the better - for your shrewd analysis, wisdom, keen insights, and a really marvelous ability to connect dots! Too bad there are so few like you out there.

George II

(67,782 posts)
4. Boburg and the Bergen Record deserve a Pulitzer Prize for their coverage of this scandal.
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 01:48 PM
Jan 2014

Don't know why Rachel Maddow is getting all the credit for this.

athena

(4,187 posts)
5. The most important part of the piece
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 02:00 PM
Jan 2014

is at the end:

It’s annoying to pay for information — I know. But if you don’t subscribe to your local paper or pony up to get behind its online paywall, who’s going to pay reporters to cover the news where you live? A free press isn’t that kind of “free.” An accountable democracy doesn’t work without real information, gathered from the ground up, about people in power, everywhere. Be inspired by the beleaguered but unintimidated reporters of Chris Christie’s New Jersey: Whatever your partisan affiliation, or lack thereof, subscribe to your local paper today. It’s an act of civic virtue.


(Emphases mine)

Sienna86

(2,149 posts)
6. Great thanks also to Ken Ward Jr. Of the Charleston Gazette
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 02:16 PM
Jan 2014

For his excellent reporting on the chemical spill affecting West Virgina.

These folks are real journalists!

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
8. Rachel Maddow's point is that we should subscribe to our local newspaper.
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 02:41 PM
Jan 2014

Be inspired by the beleaguered but unintimidated reporters of Chris Christie’s New Jersey: Whatever your partisan affiliation, or lack thereof, subscribe to your local paper today. It’s an act of civic virtue.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/rachel-maddow-nj-bridge-scandal-proves-the-need-for-dogged-local-journalism/2014/01/15/56ba6ab0-7c77-11e3-93c1-0e888170b723_story.html

The Los Angeles Times is, I suppose the local city newspaper. There are others, but that is the big one. It did not report honestly or fairly in the run-up to the Iraq War. In my opinion, it pretty much just mouthed the lies of the larger, national newspapers. I was poorly served. I have not forgiven that newspaper yet.

Worse than no reporting at all is the presentation of lies as truths. Some of our local newspapers have a problem with that.

So I prefer to read the local, local newspapers, the tiny freebies that have reporters present in the local, local meetings that I occasionally attend.

We need more of the kind of conscientious local reporting that Maddow describes. But it takes a lot of courage to do it. Not all local newspapers are worth subscribing to in my opinion. Some just are not.

athena

(4,187 posts)
10. The problem is that many people don't think about the cost of news.
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 07:22 PM
Jan 2014

I've heard people brag about how they never pay for news. Not paying for news is the same as not valuing the first amendment. Nothing is free.

If your local newspaper is not good, subscribe to the NYT online ($3.75/week), which does a lot of good investigative journalism. I would also recommend subscribing to The Nation ($18/year for an online subscription), a weekly independent magazine that does in-depth investigative journalism and often is the first to break important stories.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
9. Rachel's dead serious on exposing CChristie and his Culture of
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 07:12 PM
Jan 2014

Bully Politics.. that turned potentially deadly.

thanks Rachel and Hissyspit

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rachel Maddow Takes Chris...