Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 07:45 PM Jan 2014

WSJ Hides Conflict Of Interest In Campbell Brown's Latest Teacher Union Smear

The Wall Street Journal published an op-ed by former CNN anchor Campbell Brown that misleadingly accused teacher unions of "making it more difficult to protect children from molesters" and failed to disclose that Brown's husband is a board member of an anti-teacher union organization.

The Protecting Students from Sexual and Violent Predators Act of 2013 from Rep. George Miller (D-CA) passed in the House of Representatives in October 2013. Politico reported that the bill will "require school employees, applicants and contractors to pass a comprehensive background check that includes a check of the FBI fingerprint database, standardizing national background check policy. It would forbid school districts from knowingly transferring employees who have engaged in sexual misconduct, and it would allow districts to share background check information."

In a January 17, op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, Brown dismissed the objections of teacher unions such as the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the National Education Association (NEA) to the bill as "unconvincing," claiming the organizations' stance is "making it more difficult to protect children from molesters."

--clip
In addition, WSJ did not disclose Brown's possible conflict of interest in writing about teachers' unions - her husband, Dan Senor, sits on the board of StudentFirstNY, an organization that actively opposes teachers' unions.

The WSJ has a habit of failing to disclose their contributor's conflicts of interest when it comes to conservative policies the paper supports. According to a 2012 Media Matters review, WSJ's editorial page published op-eds from 12 writers without disclosing their roles as advisers to Mitt Romney's presidential campaign. In 2012 the paper also did not provide Campbell's background when she wrote a similarly critical op-ed of teachers unions in New York.

more...

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/01/17/wsj-hides-conflict-of-interest-in-campbell-brow/197645

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
2. Campbell Brown amazingly has a habit of writing op-eds that support her husband's ideological
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 07:48 PM
Jan 2014

agenda.

In fact, she never publishes one that goes against her husband's professional lobbying activities.

She makes staying home and baking cookies look like feminist activism.

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
3. More "sponsored content" from right wing media types? You know, like Rush Limbaugh, where someone
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 07:56 PM
Jan 2014

pays you to write something to support their cause and pretend like it was your idea to begin with? Like advertising without telling people. So much "sponsored content" these days, who even knows what a journalist truly thinks.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
6. That's Michelle Rhee's group. Remember their offensive ad about public education?
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 08:03 PM
Jan 2014
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/8465



Campbell Brown has been very obvious about her biases for quite a while.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WSJ Hides Conflict Of Int...