Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,980 posts)
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 11:39 AM Jan 2014

President Obama: "There is no shortcut to politics, and there’s no shortcut to democracy.”

In the New Yorker, David Remnick, author of The Bridge: The Life & Rise of Barack Obama, has a 17,000 word report on a pre-Thanksgiving fundraising tour with President Obama:

… When Obama leaves the White House, on January 20, 2017, he will write a memoir. “Now, that’s a slam dunk,” the former Obama adviser David Axelrod told me. Andrew Wylie, a leading literary agent, said he thought that publishers would pay between seventeen and twenty million dollars for the book—the most ever for a work of nonfiction—and around twelve million for Michelle Obama’s memoirs. (The First Lady has already started work on hers.) Obama’s best friend, Marty Nesbitt, a Chicago businessman, told me that, important as the memoir might be to Obama’s legacy and to his finances, “I don’t see him locked up in a room writing all the time. His capacity to crank stuff out is amazing. When he was writing his second book, he would say, ‘I’m gonna get up at seven and write this chapter—and at nine we’ll play golf.’ I would think no, it’s going to be a lot later, but he would knock on my door at nine and say, ‘Let’s go.’ ” Nesbitt thinks that Obama will work on issues such as human rights, education, and “health and wellness.” “He was a local community organizer when he was young,” he said. “At the back end of his career, I see him as an international and national community organizer.”

Yet no post-Presidential project—even one as worthy as Ulysses S. Grant’s memoirs or Jimmy Carter’s efforts to eradicate the Guinea worm in Africa—can overshadow what can be accomplished in the White House with the stroke of a pen or a phone call. And, after a miserable year, Obama’s Presidency is on the clock. Hard as it has been to pass legislation since the Republicans took the House, in 2010, the coming year is a marker, the final interval before the fight for succession becomes politically all-consuming…

The question is whether Obama will satisfy the standard he set for himself. His biggest early disappointment as President was being forced to recognize that his romantic vision of a post-partisan era, in which there are no red states or blue states, only the United States, was, in practical terms, a fantasy. It was a difficult fantasy to relinquish. The spirit of national conciliation was more than the rhetorical pixie dust of Obama’s 2004 speech to the Democratic National Convention, in Boston, which had brought him to delirious national attention. It was also an elemental component of his self-conception, his sense that he was uniquely suited to transcend ideology and the grubby battles of the day. Obama is defensive about this now. “My speech in Boston was an aspirational speech,” he said. “It was not a description of our politics. It was a description of what I saw in the American people.”…

Obama walked toward the stage and, as he was announced, he mouthed the words: “Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States.”

Then it happened again: another heckler broke into Obama’s speech. A man in the balcony repeatedly shouted out, “Executive order!,” demanding that the President bypass Congress with more unilateral actions. Obama listened with odd indulgence. Finally, he said, “I’m going to actually pause on this issue, because a lot of people have been saying this lately on every problem, which is just, ‘Sign an executive order and we can pretty much do anything and basically nullify Congress.’ ”

Many in the crowd applauded their approval. Yes! Nullify it! Although Obama has infuriated the right with relatively modest executive orders on gun control and some stronger ones on climate change, he has issued the fewest of any modern President, except George H. W. Bush.

“Wait, wait, wait,” Obama said. “Before everybody starts clapping, that’s not how it works. We’ve got this Constitution, we’ve got this whole thing about separation of powers. So there is no shortcut to politics, and there’s no shortcut to democracy.” The applause was hardly ecstatic. Everyone knew what he meant. The promises in the second inaugural could be a long time coming….

Obama has every right to claim a long list of victories since he took office: ending two wars; an economic rescue, no matter how imperfect; strong Supreme Court nominations; a lack of major scandal; essential support for an epochal advance in the civil rights of gays and lesbians; more progressive executive orders on climate change, gun control, and the end of torture; and, yes, health-care reform. But, no matter what one’s politics, and however one weighs the arguments of his critics, both partisan and principled, one has to wonder about any President’s capacity to make these decisions amid a thousand uncertainties, so many of which are matters of life and death, survival and extinction.

“I have strengths and I have weaknesses, like every President, like every person,” Obama said. “I do think one of my strengths is temperament. I am comfortable with complexity, and I think I’m pretty good at keeping my moral compass while recognizing that I am a product of original sin. And every morning and every night I’m taking measure of my actions against the options and possibilities available to me, understanding that there are going to be mistakes that I make and my team makes and that America makes; understanding that there are going to be limits to the good we can do and the bad that we can prevent, and that there’s going to be tragedy out there and, by occupying this office, I am part of that tragedy occasionally, but that if I am doing my very best and basing my decisions on the core values and ideals that I was brought up with and that I think are pretty consistent with those of most Americans, that at the end of the day things will be better rather than worse.”…

MORE:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Bridge-Barack-Obama-Vintage/dp/037570230X/ref=cm_cr_pr_pb_t
http://www.amazon.com/The-Bridge-Barack-Obama-Vintage/dp/037570230X/ref=cm_cr_pr_pb_t

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
2. Except for fast tracking the TPP of course...
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 11:45 AM
Jan 2014

After that politics won't matter so much in the USA thankfully, that burden will be lifted from us and we can all get down to the serious business of adequately praising our economic betters, the job creators.

The large print giveth, the small print taketh away.



Hutzpa

(11,461 posts)
12. If you believe that the next president will change or removed
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 01:18 PM
Jan 2014

any of NSA, TPP, Drones..... then you really have not been paying attention.

We are completely and utterly screwed.

Autumn

(45,026 posts)
14. Oh I pay attention alright. No way in hell
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 01:43 PM
Jan 2014

is any President going to change this. We are well passed utterly screwed.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
4. Posting a considered, 18-page article on the president ...
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 12:30 PM
Jan 2014

is just an invitation for the "haters" (not my term, but DUs) to come and post their one-line diatribes. They won't read the 18 pages, or even 2 pages: they only read headers, and then respond with slogans.

It frankly doesn't bother me anymore. They are not comfortable with complexity, so I realize there's no point in offering complex thoughts about a complex world or complex individuals to them. Their loss, I guess.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
5. I read every word of it. I thought it was pretty good.
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 12:35 PM
Jan 2014

Somehow I don't think you've read it.


And the people who have no use for complexity or ambiguity are the adorers who refuse to really grapple with this presidency or those who don't seem to grasp this complex tidbit: A good man is not automatically a good president. Going further than that, I think it's fair to posit that our system is now so hopelessly corrupt that it taints whoever is President.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
10. Nice try at turning my argument around
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 12:47 PM
Jan 2014

And yes, I read all 18 pages yesterday, and I also thought it was good.

That does not change my view of the sloganeers. And I am not an "adorer": as I said, I appreciate complexity. Where I see "adorers" is in those who use the term even as they participate in the cult of personality with any parvenu du jour who utters a sentence with which they momentarily agree. No, let me put it more bluntly, for those who might not enjoy complexity: I see it every day when people post fundraising emails as if they were policy statements or accomplishments of state--failing to mention the "Donate" button at the bottom. (I get all these same fundraising emails every day, too, so I find it amusing.) These are the untested heroes worshiped here at DU. Which would be okay, if these easy words were acknowledged as merely aspirational and contrasted with the real-world complexities and agonies that face actual leaders grappling with a world that has no Donate button at the bottom.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
9. The Clacque won't read it either, they aren't comfortable with anything short of adoration
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 12:44 PM
Jan 2014

How about ~that~ broad brush?

struggle4progress

(118,270 posts)
11. Here's the actual link to the New Yorker article:
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 12:47 PM
Jan 2014
Going the Distance
On and off the road with Barack Obama.
by David Remnick
January 27, 2014

Hutzpa

(11,461 posts)
13. The bottom line is this
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 01:33 PM
Jan 2014

Last edited Mon Jan 20, 2014, 02:23 PM - Edit history (1)

it is just as hard fighting for Peace as you would fighting wars.

Fighting for Peace is much more complex than fighting an open war which majority of people on our side
don't understand or do not want to comprehend.

It will take someone of great character complexity (someone who is seem to be misunderstood but gets the job done) to undo this cacophony that has been created by republicans with the help of some democrats, that has stagnated this country's progress.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
15. IOW, the DLC knwos *very intimately* that there's a strong schism between democracy
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 04:30 PM
Jan 2014

and elections--why else would they claim that if a candidate gets X% of the vote that means they represent X% of the people? it's not like they'd admit to a duopoly!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama: "Th...