Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 03:03 PM Jan 2014

Christie Vetoed Sandy Oversight Bill, Created Gulliani Inspired "Integrity Monitors" - Star/Ledger

By Jenna Portnoy/The Star-Ledger
on April 25, 2013 at 6:25 PM, updated April 26, 2013 at 7:51 AM

How many slightly smoking guns does it take before he resigns or is impeached? Check out the Integrity Monitors that Christie established instead!
_______________

http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/04/christie_vetoes_sandy_oversigh_1.html


"Chris Christie today vetoed a bill that he said would have created redundant oversight in state spending of billions of dollars federal Sandy relief funding.

Aristide Econompoulos/The Star-Ledger

TRENTON — Gov. Chris Christie today vetoed a bill requiring oversight of billions of dollars in federal aid for Hurricane Sandy, despite Democratic objections, calling the measure redundant and wasteful.

“While I thank the sponsors for their efforts, and for sharing in my commitment to the transparent and efficient administration of Sandy recovery funding, this bill would produce unnecessary redundancies and waste government resources,” Christie said in the two-page veto message.

The bill (A61) would have required the treasurer to set up a website to track contracts by county and municipality, issue quarterly reports on recovery dollars and put out “expedited priority reports” explaining any problems the administration encounters.

Assembly Speaker Sheila Oliver (D-Essex) said the bill would have written oversight into state law, rather than taking the Republican governor’s word for it.

“Residents devastated by this storm deserve the peace of mind that the billions in federal funds slated for the recovery will be administered efficiently and appropriately,” Oliver said. “This bill would have done that. Now all they have is a stated goal from the governor that can be broken or rescinded without the power of law. With his veto, the governor has weakened oversight and transparency of Hurricane Sandy relief funding.”
_____________

The next month (after the veto), Christie signed an executive order promising that state Comptroller Matthew Boxer would review the awarding of all Sandy-related contracts and set up a public website to track state spending of federal funds. Usually, Boxer’s office only clears contracts in excess of $10 million before they are granted. In addition, the governor said the state would hire “accountability officers” to oversee projects in every department that deals with rebuilding.

Christie also signed bills establishing a separate network of “integrity monitors” to review the procurement process for state contracts using federal reconstruction money and reiterated the need for regular reporting on the contracts as well as online posting of spending information.

As envisioned by the Legislature, the integrity monitors would protect against fraud and abuse, using as a model the monitors installed by Mayor Rudolph Giuliani in the rebuilding effort after the Sept. 11, 2001.

_____________

“Today, when presented with an opportunity to ensure that taxpayers' money was going to the families trying to rebuild their lives, he vetoed legislation that would do just that,” Buono said in a statement. “If the governor supports transparency, I find it incomprehensible as to why he would not make it law."

The state is waiting for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to approve its plan for spending $1.8 billion block grant – the first money to flow into the state for rebuilding. Christie said last week that he hoped the money would come through this week.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Christie Vetoed Sandy Oversight Bill, Created Gulliani Inspired "Integrity Monitors" - Star/Ledger (Original Post) Fred Sanders Jan 2014 OP
Any time a politician is against oversight over the disbursement of funds, it's a bad thing. Ikonoklast Jan 2014 #1
No Christie, redundant and wasteful is the Senate special election you insisted on. SunSeeker Jan 2014 #2

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
1. Any time a politician is against oversight over the disbursement of funds, it's a bad thing.
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 05:27 PM
Jan 2014

He has plans for that money, and doesn't want anyone to find them out.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
2. No Christie, redundant and wasteful is the Senate special election you insisted on.
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 05:37 PM
Jan 2014

Forcing the election to replace NJ Senator to take place separately, just days before the general election in November, needlessly cost NJ taxpayers millions and wasted everyone's time having to take time off to vote twice within a few weeks time.

Please, spare me your bullshit. We ALL know why you don't want real Sandy relief oversight. And we ALL know why you did not want Booker on the same ballot as you. We all know it's got NOTHING to do with saving taxpayer money.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Christie Vetoed Sandy Ove...