The Supreme Court Case That Could Clobber Public-Sector Unions
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/01/the-supreme-court-case-that-could-clobber-public-sector-unions/283232/
William Messenger of the National Right to Work Committee asked the Supreme Court today to hold that public employee unions are unconstitutional.
This isI'm just going to use the word here, it is a radical argument. It would radically restructure the way workplaces across this country areare run, Justice Elena Kagan said from the bench. Since 1948, she pointed out, states have had the power to enact right-to-work laws that limit union power. Was Messenger arguing that a right-to-work law is constitutionally compelled?
Messenger didnt back off. In the public sector, yes, he replied.
His clients, home-care providers paid by the state of Illinois with federal-state Medicaid funds, had started out arguing only that they were not employees for purposes of coverage by the Courts previous labor precedents. (Though they get state paychecks, they are selected and supervised by the families they serve.) But after cert was granted, their lawyers, the NRTWCs legal-defense fund, decided instead to go for the kill shot. They want the court to hold that permitting the unions to collect fees for representing non-membersthe so-called agency feeviolates the First Amendment.
At least four members of the Court seemed ready to reach that radical result. The fate of public employee unionism in the nation seemed, by the end of the argument, to lie in the hands of Justice Antonin Scalia.