Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 12:41 PM Jan 2014

Riddle me this: let's say the GOP loses House seats but still hangs on to a slim majority BUT

the tea baggers are the majority within the now smaller GOP overall majority. Would Boehner start trying to cut deals with some Dems to join the remaining non crazy GOPers and keep him as speaker? And what would be a big enough concession to the Dems for them to consider it? Control of certain committee?

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Riddle me this: let's say the GOP loses House seats but still hangs on to a slim majority BUT (Original Post) arely staircase Jan 2014 OP
Good question. Laelth Jan 2014 #1
Interesting. Might help clarify the two actual parties that we have: A Center/Right business villager Jan 2014 #2
how does he actually "govern" the house in that scenario? unblock Jan 2014 #3
easy arely staircase Jan 2014 #4
yeah, perhaps you haven't noticed how hyper-partisan washington is these days. unblock Jan 2014 #6
but it would end manufactured debt limit/government shutdown freakouts arely staircase Jan 2014 #9
First time the tea party wing doesnt like what he brings up, they hold another vote for Speaker... stevenleser Jan 2014 #15
Starts wearing a cape Skink Jan 2014 #5
If the tea party takes over the GOP majority MissMillie Jan 2014 #7
care to expand on that? nt arely staircase Jan 2014 #10
each new Congress votes for its Speaker MissMillie Jan 2014 #12
Yep, he is not their first choice, by a longshot. nt stevenleser Jan 2014 #17
everybody gets to vote for speaker (or don't they?) arely staircase Jan 2014 #19
Yes everyone votes, but there are two nominees MissMillie Jan 2014 #21
so it is possible arely staircase Jan 2014 #22
Smart money says Bohner steps down and Eric Cantor make a run for the seat Brother Buzz Jan 2014 #8
I'm thinking the crazies will want someone like gohmert. nt arely staircase Jan 2014 #11
Electing Louie Gohmert would be a wet dream for the teabaggers, and it ain't gonna happen Brother Buzz Jan 2014 #16
There aren't enough crazies to make that happen onenote Jan 2014 #18
I 'predicted' (made a wild guess) that something like this would happen last year. randome Jan 2014 #13
He might try, but it won't work Motown_Johnny Jan 2014 #14
it is better to let their real face show but not govern arely staircase Jan 2014 #20
Let's say we work our asses off to make sure that doesn't happen. MineralMan Jan 2014 #23
well, yeah arely staircase Jan 2014 #24
Excellent! Not every district can elect a Democrat, but MineralMan Jan 2014 #25

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
1. Good question.
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 12:43 PM
Jan 2014

I have nothing to add to this discussion, but I am interested in hearing what people "in the know" have to say.

-Laelth

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
2. Interesting. Might help clarify the two actual parties that we have: A Center/Right business
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 12:46 PM
Jan 2014

...party, and a far-right fascist kook party.

unblock

(52,113 posts)
3. how does he actually "govern" the house in that scenario?
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 12:55 PM
Jan 2014

does he do what the majority of the republican caucus wants, i.e., do whatever the tea baggers want him to do? if he's fine with that, why not just cut a deal with the tea baggers do to just that?

does he constantly try to forge agreements between all non-tea-baggers in congress (democrats and less-insane republicans), i.e., be a coalition leader with a split republican party? if so, he'd be acting like a pelosi would and he'd be run out of town on a rail.


i can't see it. if the tea-baggers get the majority of a majority gop caucus, then the tea baggers find their own speaker.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
4. easy
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 12:59 PM
Jan 2014

Brings to the floor anything that has a chance of passing whether a majority of Republicans support it or not just like speakers did from the beginning of the republic until Denny Hastert in 1999.

unblock

(52,113 posts)
6. yeah, perhaps you haven't noticed how hyper-partisan washington is these days.
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 01:11 PM
Jan 2014

easy to imagine, but that sort of thing ain't gonna happen time soon.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
9. but it would end manufactured debt limit/government shutdown freakouts
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 02:02 PM
Jan 2014

Or Boehner and the Democrats could just say fuck it let Gohmert be speaker.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
15. First time the tea party wing doesnt like what he brings up, they hold another vote for Speaker...
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 02:23 PM
Jan 2014

... and he is gone.

MissMillie

(38,526 posts)
12. each new Congress votes for its Speaker
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 02:11 PM
Jan 2014

If the GOP maintains control of the House, the GOP will vote in a Speaker. And if the tea party is the majority of the majority, I doubt that they would vote for Boehner to remain as Speaker.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
19. everybody gets to vote for speaker (or don't they?)
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 02:41 PM
Jan 2014

That's my point. Boehner could get Dems and non (less) crazy Repubs to keep him in.

MissMillie

(38,526 posts)
21. Yes everyone votes, but there are two nominees
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 02:56 PM
Jan 2014

one from each party.

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL30857.pdf



Each new House elects a Speaker by roll call vote when it first convenes. Customarily, the
conference of each major party nominates a candidate whose name is placed in nomination.
Members normally vote for the candidate of their own party conference, but may vote for any
individual, whether nominated or not. To be elected, a candidate must receive an absolute
majority of all the votes cast for individuals. This number may be less than a majority (now 218)
of the full membership of the House, because of vacancies, absentees, or Members voting
“present.”



I suppose that if enough people hated a tea party extremist nominee for Speaker, they all could vote "present" and send the GOP back to the drawing board for a more moderate nominee.

Brother Buzz

(36,364 posts)
16. Electing Louie Gohmert would be a wet dream for the teabaggers, and it ain't gonna happen
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 02:23 PM
Jan 2014

As odious as Eric Canter is, he's a bit more electable. Remember, both sides of the aisle vote for Speaker of the House.

onenote

(42,531 posts)
18. There aren't enough crazies to make that happen
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 02:26 PM
Jan 2014

It seems like there are, but in reality the hard core crazies in the repub caucus are a minority and will remain one in any conceivable 2014 election scenario.

Let's take the most extreme situation -- the repubs hold the House by one vote (218-217), meaning that they lost 15 seats. The exact number of crazies in the repub caucus -- the ones that have consistently been willing to vote against Boehner when he and the rest of the repub caucus have been willing to make even a small accomodation -- is probably somewhere between 40 and 50. But even if you use 64, which is the number of Repubs voting against the trillion dollar budget deal earlier this month, it's not possible to construct a scenario in which the crazies are a majority of the repub House caucus.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
13. I 'predicted' (made a wild guess) that something like this would happen last year.
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 02:17 PM
Jan 2014

I think it's possible that 'reasonable' Republicans will cross over. But the Tea Party now seems to be in decline so it may not happen.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]“If you're not committed to anything, you're just taking up space.”
Gregory Peck, Mirage (1965)
[/center][/font][hr]

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
14. He might try, but it won't work
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 02:21 PM
Jan 2014

It would be better to let the real face of the new Republican party show. If they want to vote in a nut job then we need to let them vote in a nut job.


Better now than later.


arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
20. it is better to let their real face show but not govern
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 02:43 PM
Jan 2014

If gohmert became speaker the US would default on its debt obligations.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
24. well, yeah
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 03:43 PM
Jan 2014

I'm a precinct chair in a precinct that hasn't had one in almost 20 years. My goal is to get 40 -45 percent for Wendy Davis in a box that usually sees dems get 30 - 35 percent. I can't help with congress because I don't think there is a Dem even running against Gohmert.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Riddle me this: let's say...