General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaybe I'm waaay wrong on this, but aren't married women the biggest consumers of birth control?
esp. married women with children???
IOW, it's not the Republican mythological single woman running around having sex willy nilly. Rather, it's married women who have sex on a regular basis with their husbands that use birth control more, esp. when they have kids and don't want to have more.
I apologize if I am wrong.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)ridiculous rhetoric like Huckabees.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Who uses what medications or medical services when is *never* any business of politicians.
Ever.
Yavin4
(35,432 posts)framing issues are very, very important. Republicans win on issues when they can create these negative images in the minds of the people, "welfare queen", "wanton woman", "thug", etc., and reality is totally different.
If the majority of birth control users are married women, then that disrupts their stupid narrative.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)And/or that women in other groups are less worthy of safe legal and PRIVATE medical care. And that bothers me. Women are entitled to privacy and legal medical services without interference from the public.
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)factually as well. Huckabee is trying to make the point that women who want/need birth control should control their libidos as if to say they're sluts. Well, not only is he wrong is the most moral sense, I also don't believe that single women are the largest consumers of birth contro pills. Pointing out someone is wrong in two ways doesn't take away from either element of being wrong.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)whereas married women have transferred Daddy's financial responsibilities to their husbands.
The focus is on who is paying for it because that has broader appeal than just saying single women shouldn't have sex.
brush
(53,764 posts)What the hell are these repugs thinking with their rhetoric?
Guess they don't want to win another general election, winning the repug primaries where their wing nut/teabagger base comes out strong is enough for them I guess because turning off half the population sure ain't gonna get it.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Yavin4
(35,432 posts)Okay.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)If a woman has a husband to pay for things, then if they use contraception she doesn't need it covered by insurance.
Whether they have children is his decision to make. Obviously if she is sneaking birth control pills behind his back, then it's probably because she is fooling around during the day with some unemployed man, maybe even an entitled minority. And THAT is probably why she isn't getting dinner on the table when he comes home!
Yavin4
(35,432 posts)HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)and never ever lose his job! That sounds like the George Bush school of thought that the solution to poverty is a wedding ring.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)All most men need to do is borrow some money from their parents to start a business.
Pedoviejo2
(14 posts)Oh, no.
That would conflict with the directives of U. S. Rep. Steve Pearce (Republican New Mexico).
His statement:
"The wife is to voluntarily submit, just as the husband is to lovingly lead and sacrifice," he writes. "The husbands part is to show up during the times of deep stress, take the leadership role and be accountable for the outcome, blaming no one else."
Mariana
(14,854 posts)Of course not. Married women should have sex with their husbands whenever they demand it, and if the women get pregnant when they don't want to be, well, that's Gawd's will and they should accept it.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)will never be an issue if they are wed in a Christian Church. Ah, yes, the Holy Sacrament of Matrimony prevents POVERTY!!!!
raptor_rider
(1,014 posts)He was the one that decided to get fixed. He made the dr appts his self! He didn't want me on the cancer/mood killing drugs. He'd rTher go through the pain for a few days, than me on them.
This was over 6 years ago, and we've had the happiest sex life ever!! No worries. He just turned 40, and I'm 38, and enjoy sex 4 times a week!!! If not more!!
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)raptor_rider
(1,014 posts)Oh my! Nope! Good one!!!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)KG
(28,751 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)raptor_rider
(1,014 posts)and has the libido of a 20 year old. We could go at it every night, however there is sleep and kids. He's been fixed for over 6 years, and his libido has never died. Women on birth control, tubes tied, or totally taking her entire reproductive parts out, it kills their libido!! The HRT they have to take, kills everything!!
We totally enjoy our sex life!!!
Ilsa
(61,692 posts)Daily use of "the pill" to manage her symptoms. Several years ago she had a cyst rupture and although she wasn't hospitalized, a family member had to stay with and care for her for about a week. Needless to say, she needed a different dose, but many young women manage with fairly common dosages of birth control pills to manage their symptoms.
I don't have PCOS*, but I had a small cyst rupture once. It was like being stabbed in the abdomen repeatedly with an ice pick. The Pill isn't just for birth control. It helps a lot of young women manage debilitating symptoms caused by their reproductive systems. It's why many middle aged women become more productive after hysterectomies.
*PCOS: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrine disorders among females. PCOS is a complex, heterogeneous disorder of uncertain etiology, but there is strong evidence that it can, to a large degree, be classified as a genetic disease.[1][2][3]PCOS produces symptoms in approximately 5% to 10% of women of reproductive age (approximately 12 to 45 years old). It is thought to be one of the leading causes of female subfertility[4][5][6] and the most frequent endocrine problem in women of reproductive age.[7]The principal features are anovulation, which results in irregular menstruation, amenorrhea, and ovulation-related infertility; excessive amounts or effects of androgenic (masculinizing) hormones, which results in acne and hirsutism; and insulin resistance, which is often associated with obesity,Type 2 diabetes, and high cholesterol levels.[8]Finding that the ovaries appear polycystic on ultrasound is common, but it is not an absolute requirement in all definitions of the disorder. The symptoms and severity of the syndrome vary greatly among affected women.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)When I was 12 years old. Periods so bad I couldn't stand up, or go to school, for 10 days a month. That is not counting the severe anemia I had from the very heavy bleeding every month. My doctor told my parents, this "pill", or a D & C for a preteen girl. Sex? Not even in the picture. Did it help? Oh, YES, it did.
Most people don't even KNOW that the Pill was even around back in those days, let alone used for other than BC purposes.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)One time I got so bad I insisted on taking her to the emergency room. I remember the doctor being a real dick too. So while I can't fully understand the pain involved, I can guess it would be like someone grabbing my testicles and trying to pull them over my head.
Ilsa
(61,692 posts)sore you can hardly walk, turn your body. That's usually from the inflammatory process of a rupturing cyst.
One friend told me that her rupturing cyst was more painful than giving birth.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]If you're not committed to anything, you're just taking up space.
Gregory Peck, Mirage (1965)[/center][/font][hr]
Warpy
(111,237 posts)for married men to complain they got more sex when they were single, especially when they've got kids. You bet your ass married women are the main consumers of birth control.
Sex crazed Republican males are just projecting, as usual.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)Would be pretty effective birth control.
Warpy
(111,237 posts)And yeah, nothing kills desire like a screaming baby with a loaded diaper, especially when there is no birth control available. Unfortunately, it only kills it in women.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)If the Rethugs had their way.
Women having control of their reproductive choices married or not is unacceptable.
Freddie
(9,258 posts)In Doris Kearns Goodwin's wonderful "The Fitzgeralds and the Kennedys" she mentioned that after Rose gave birth to her 9th child, Ted, she decided there would be no more children, kicked Joe out of her bedroom, and that was that. 100% Vatican-approved birth control. Is that what Huckabee and Republican men want?
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)....and if she refused then the GOP would not have defined forced sex against the will of a woman as 'rape' since they were married.
Freddie
(9,258 posts)As license to "seek comfort elsewhere" which was a common "solution" in those days when a wife decided no more babies.
I've read that the number of married men patronizing prostitutes has greatly decreased in the past 50 years or so, no doubt due to healthier attitudes about the role of sex in a relationship and female sexuality. Contraception plays a huge part in this. Naturally the GOP wants, again, to set the clock back 100 years.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)I mean a couple of those nutjobs have said that there is no such thing as rape in a marriage. Idiots!
alsame
(7,784 posts)the Duggars and give birth every nine months.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)avebury
(10,952 posts)to their husbands' desires to sire dynasties per the Republican party jobs plan.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)Truth is, I have no idea who these people are. I just think it's a funny picture.
Demit
(11,238 posts)druidity33
(6,446 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Is they are acting as though birth control is some expensive, brand name, designer drug, when it is in fact a generic that pharmacists could fill for a low charge (except in cases where special dose or brand is required). There was even worry that drug companies wouldn't make it after it was universally covered because there would be no profit in it. But the idea that a woman should be forced to pay over $300 a month for coverage and then pay for her prescriptions on top of that is absurd.
These people are bitching about a prescription that costs about the same as a round of antibiotics. It's cheaper than most statins that doctors have everyone on now. It's such a minute thing and the insurance companies could care less. This is all ginned up faux outrage. And it just shows how stupid people are to go along with it and how morally bankrupt the Republicans are. School shootings: OK. Woman protecting her health: NOT OK.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)modrepub
(3,493 posts)I'm pretty sure Repubs do very poorly with single women but do somewhat better with married women. Huckabee's comment is aimed squarely at single women. The point that many married couple use different types of birth control is probably a valid point. I just wish there would be someone with the balls enough to ask people like Huckabee if they engaged in premarital sex. For disclosure purposes, I'm married, we use birth control and I had premarital sex (but not often).
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)married or single, with a dumbass argument like that. My guess, though, is that when he talks about women who can't control their libidos and want free birth control, he's really referring to "those people" - meaning women of color, who, to Huck and his ilk, are all sluts by nature. But then, those very same wingnut idiots have fits about all "those people" (slutty women of color, of course) who have lots of babies just so they can get welfare. In any event, I suspect there's a strong undercurrent of racism here, as well as sexism.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)I have had 2 friends who were prescribed birth control to help deal with cysts on their ovaries. It's one of the cheapest ways to deal with cysts.
I know there are many other uses too.
Yavin4
(35,432 posts)The public's perception of an issue goes a long way towards actual policy. If Huck and Repubs can convince a gullible public that the women who use birth control are wanton women, then that perception may find its way into policy. For those women who have a medical condition like you posted, then they will make an exception for those.
The reality of the situation is that it's married women, probably with children, who are the highest users of birth control since they are more likely to have unprotected sex on a regular basis.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)"Mothers aren't into birth control". Sure, Rush. All mothers want to be mothers over and over again until menopause? I seriously doubt most mothers want to compete with Michelle Duggar.
One loony Freeper said, "The majority of women are either not sexually active ( when married?), or are trying to get pregnant, or are pregnant (constantly until menopause?????).
When they gave out brains, these people were absent.
bkanderson76
(266 posts)right on this...I'm sure its not married men.
abakan
(1,819 posts)I am concerned about the kind of women the republicans have in their lives and families. I mean their mothers, sisters, grandmothers, aunts, wives and daughters, must be the most wanton bunch of women on the planet. A republican describing anything to do with a female human has no bases in fact as I know it, or anyone I know, knows it. So I can only surmise republican women are wanton sluts. I see no other conclusion, it's either this one or they are all full of what they are spreading.......I chose both...
lefthandedlefty
(281 posts)Is to have the U.S. so overpopulated that we will work for what ever crumbs they throw at us and to put such a strain on resources that only the rich can use them.
Freddie
(9,258 posts)A woman with control over her childbearing has control over her life and can be independent from men. That's what the "submissive wife" crowd finds so offensive. Personally I think a woman's ultimate right to determine whether, when, and how many children she shall bear should be enshrined in the Constitution.
lefthandedlefty
(281 posts)Hasn`t anyone noticed the war on labor in this country since 1981.Every repug politition blames labor and labor cost for all corporate problems.
Contrary1
(12,629 posts)WHO USES CONTRACEPTIVES?
More than 99% of women aged 1544 who have ever had sexual intercourse have used at least one contraceptive method.[5]
Some 62% of all women of reproductive age are currently using a contraceptive method.[2]
Eleven percent of women at risk of unintended pregnancy are not currently using any contraceptive method.[2]
The proportion of women at risk who are not using a method is highest among 1519-year-olds (18%) and lowest among women aged 4044 (9%).[2]
Eighty-three percent of black women who are at risk of unintended pregnancy currently use a contraceptive method, compared with 91% of their Hispanic and white peers, and 90% of Asian women.[2]
Ninety-two percent of at-risk women with incomes of 300% or more of the federal poverty level are currently using contraceptives, compared with 89% among those living at 0149% of the poverty line.[2]
A much higher proportion of married than of never-married women use a contraceptive method (77% vs. 42%). This is largely because married women are more likely to be sexually active. But even among those at risk of unintended pregnancy, contraceptive use is higher among currently married women than among never-married women (93% vs. 83%).
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_contr_use.html
RainDog
(28,784 posts)by the use of the term "Uncle Sugar" as in Sugar Daddy - he was saying the Democrats want to be the Sugar Daddy of married women.
I hope Huckabee feels a collective slap in the face from all women in this nation, because that's what he deserves.
OnionPatch
(6,169 posts)(and I'm still scratching my head over this "libido" comment), why is it that according to Republicans, anything that helps someone is an insult? Anything that helps someone is "actually hurting them" in some way. WTF? If that were the case, Jesus should be considered an equal to Hitler, shouldn't he?
Republicans have really gone over the cliff on this upside-down reasoning. I guess that's what happens when you have no valid arguments to support your point of view.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)Because they're the party of hate.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)I could see that.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)MEN and Women?
It's not like women are engaging in physical relations with themselves or that the men,who are participating, aren't also receiving the benefits of the products being purchased.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)when i was single as when i was married. of course, i was single in the late 60s -- "make love not war" and i did.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)It is about enforcing a male dominated patriarchal order.
haele
(12,646 posts)Birth control is not just for birth control. Let's just say, without access to that little pill dispenser, there was a very long period in my life where, while I may not have been dating, you wouldn't want to make me angry - one week every month.
Haele
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)the idea of women running around having sex willy nilly would have appealed to the younger me.
hunter
(38,309 posts)I suspect all those married couples are having sex and frankly I don't think many of them, if any, are practicing the sort of calender/thermometer sex the nice pure Catholic couple with three kids (probably more coming...) tried to teach us at our Monday-through-Saturday religious camp, men in one dorm, women in the other, Engagement Encounter.
Oh heck, I'll come right out and say it, my wife and I do not have a bus full of kids.
Unlike our parents.
My "choose life" mom told us to bring home any children we conceived. The more the merrier. Me and my siblings were so terrified of the prospect that none of us had kids until we were married and very well settled into a place we could take care of them. (By modern standards "taking care of" was sometimes iffy with my parents. We always had something to eat and a more-or-less safe place to sleep, but beyond that all life was an adventure. Clothes were hand-me-downs, sometimes the showers were cold, and maybe there was no soap. When I was in college my parents would write checks to the college that bounced. Fortunately college was cheap then and the system forgiving. Nothing like the $3000-or-else we kick your kid out of the dorms and classrooms checks I've written for my own kids.)
Me and my siblings' overall fertility is less that two, same with my wife's siblings.
It's not magic.
raptor_rider
(1,014 posts)I have 3 children, and have been married for 10 years. No birth control here!! For me anyways. We do not use condoms either. I have not had my tubes tied, or a hystrectomy. When I was 6 months pregnant with my last, my husband went and had his vas deferens cut. He didn't want me taking the hormone replacements. It messes with moods and sexuality.
I'm 38, and still can have kids, however this shows love and loyalty. If I ever end up pregnant, it'll not be his. However, I'll never cheat on him!!!
We enjoy every special moment with each other, with no worries!!!
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)It is an interesting question.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)at home raising babies so they can't be in the workforce.