Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

LuvNewcastle

(16,834 posts)
1. If it was up to them, all that stuff would be cut out as well.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 07:38 AM
Jan 2014

They would create a new generation of Okies, traveling around from place to place looking for jobs. What this is really about is trying to force people to take whatever shit job they can find. They don't care if people have to relocate their families to work a minimum wage job. They don't care about creating new jobs with decent wages, either. This is the new economy, folks. Work for peanuts or starve.

The TPP will create even more of these shit jobs. The goal is to bring down the American lifestyle to where it's more in line with the rest of the world. We've had it too good here, you know. They won't bring the jobs back until we're accustomed to working for less. This is a wage war between workers and multi-national corporations, and so far, the corporations are way ahead.

Herself

(185 posts)
2. homes and property taxes not paid
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 07:48 AM
Jan 2014

will be snapped up pennies on the dollar.

The plantation owners will be celebrating their plunder, and enjoy having their slaves back. The new equal opportunity slave owners, they don't care what race you are.

LuvNewcastle

(16,834 posts)
5. A lot of us are already debt slaves, and Blackstone Group is already
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 08:13 AM
Jan 2014

America's largest landlord. What you describe is happening as we speak.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024386540

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
13. It's better than having their slaves back.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 10:21 AM
Jan 2014

You had to house, feed, and provide health care to slaves or you could lose some of your asset.

Now they don't have to house, feed, and they obviously don't want to provide health care.

Costs them a lot less this way. Nobody said they were stupid, just evil.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
12. The Okies at least had somewhere to go that finally worked out - today where is the new California?
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 10:14 AM
Jan 2014

This is not going to get better until we start learning from FDR how to make things better and I do not mean a war.

emanymton

(2,102 posts)
4. Yes, RepublicanTs Do Understand The Effects Of Their Efforts.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 08:09 AM
Jan 2014

.

This is not single level program. The destruction of the social welfare net is multilevel projects design to take apart the system. The people involved are of no consequence.

RepublicanTs are paid not to care. Callous indifference to the well-being of people is rewarded.

Focus. The money-class is all about profit. The minions of the money-class are to do the bidding for the money-class. The minions play their parts in the tragedy believing the destruction will not affect the minions.

When minions are finally caught up in the losing end of the game, the minions are truly surprised. But by then, the wholesale damage is done.

Ema Nymton
~ @ : o ?
.

Response to Glitterati (Original post)

TBF

(32,004 posts)
9. And we know which actions to take -
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 09:17 AM
Jan 2014

From mid 1930's to mid 1980's at best (roughly a 50 year span) this country figured out that too little $$$ in the hands of too few (think the the 1920's gilded age and resulting depression in 30s) didn't work. Well, it works for the uber-wealthy but it does not work for the rest of us. So in the interest of saving capitalism laws were passed to ensure a safety net. Taxation was also increased on high-earning individuals - and in my view ought to include corporations (particularly multi-nationals) paying taxes.

We could do this again if we wanted to.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
10. Right. And if they cut Social Security which allows the average recipient to live just a tad above
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 09:18 AM
Jan 2014

the poverty level, the same thing will happen. Many seniors who now get by on Social Security will qualify for all kinds of programs based on need.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Seriously, the Repubs did...