General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA Farm Bill Only a Lobbyist Could Love
Source: Businessweek
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-01-30/farm-bill-draws-lobbyist-horde#r=hp-ls
-------------------------------------
On Jan. 27, House and Senate leaders announced what just a few months ago seemed impossiblea deal on a five-year, almost half-trillion-dollar farm bill. The legislation had languished for more than a year as Democrats and Republicans haggled over food stamps and crop subsidies. Two things broke the impasse: an unusual urban-rural alliance that hung together to preserve threatened programs; and lots (and lots) of money from lobbyists.
The legislation cuts food stamp spending by $8.6 billion over 10 yearsa fifth of the $40 billion that Republicans wanted and that Democrats and food retailers fought to protect. Crop growers will lose $50 billion in subsidies over the next decade, including an end to the controversial direct payments program, which gave checks to some farmers regardless of financial need. Growers will get back about two-thirds of that lost spending in the form of enhanced crop insurance and other benefits.
The great thing the ag coalition did was include inner-city and suburban food stamp recipients in addition to the more conservative farmers, says Steve Bell, a former top Republican Senate budget aide and now senior director of economic policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center in Washington. The combination of strong Republican advocates and Democratic food stamp advocates is unbeatable. If the bill is signed into law (which seems likely by early February), it will conclude one of the toughest spending fights in almost two decades.
...
Many advocates for the poor, as well as Democrats in Congress, were furious about the partial food stamp rollbacks. About 850,000 U.S. households will see their food support cut by about $90 a month. Southern cotton growers were upset over losing billions in direct crop payments, although theyll stand to gain from a new subsidy program that will pay them if prices drop. And groups representing large meatpackers such as Tyson Foods (TSN) were disappointed that the bill left intact rules requiring all meat sold in the U.S. to carry a country-of-origin label saying where the animal was born, raised, and slaughtered. The rules prevent companies from labeling meat as being entirely of U.S. origin if, for example, the pig or calf was born in Canada and slaughtered in the U.S. The industry says the rule threatens to incite a trade war with other nations. We will literally use all our resources to kill this bill, Wyoming rancher Scott George, president of the National Cattlemens Beef Association, said in a Jan. 28 conference call.
-----------------------------------------
150 million spent by lobbyists to influence the bill. 150 million.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Cutting the SNAP program; while packages, weights and volumes of food are decreasing with prices ever increasing; makes absolutely no sense. Republican's heartless greed and stupidity shining through.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)That could compete with the corporate influence. Pipe dream, I know.