Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

global1

(25,225 posts)
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:11 PM Jan 2014

Any HR People Here? - What Is The Stigma About The Long Term Unemployed.....

that makes HR people put their resumes in the circular file and not consider them for a job?

Just heard that even a person that has been unemployed for 6 months would be passed up to one that in only out of a job for 1 month.

Why?

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Any HR People Here? - What Is The Stigma About The Long Term Unemployed..... (Original Post) global1 Jan 2014 OP
It depends on a lot of different things Major Nikon Jan 2014 #1
What jobs are really "use it or lose it"? PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #2
Graphic and or production design is a one example. Raine1967 Jan 2014 #3
Software gets updated yearly PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #5
Employee attributes fall under skills, education and/or experience, and competencies Major Nikon Jan 2014 #4
Here's one take JPZenger Jan 2014 #6

Major Nikon

(36,818 posts)
1. It depends on a lot of different things
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:20 PM
Jan 2014

In general in a down economy with high unemployment, the lack of recent experience is not by itself a disqualifying factor. Some jobs are "use it or lose it" in regard to certain skills, so recent experience is more valuable. Also if you are looking for someone with a particular set of skills that's pretty much ready to go without training, then recent experience is a boon.

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
2. What jobs are really "use it or lose it"?
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:31 PM
Jan 2014

I hear this often cited, but have never had first hand experience in any area where this would be true. Most knowledge imo is retained, so at worst it would be like riding a bike, skiing, or something similar; you may be out of practice, but the ramp up time is very short compared to someone newly into the area.

I just can not think of any jobs where "use it or lose it" is true (a professional athlete would be one, but "normal" people don't have this career.)

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
3. Graphic and or production design is a one example.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:43 PM
Jan 2014

One needs to be up on design trends and software applications. Long term unemployed people in this business would need to be trained again in order to find a job in that field.

I'm not sure what *normal* is.

When technology is involved, knowledge is one thing, being able to use the new tools for said field is another.

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
5. Software gets updated yearly
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:47 PM
Jan 2014

That is the way it is. Very little functionality is actually changed. The "core" functions of the software packages today are the same as 10 years ago. Menus change, layout changes, and some "features" are added, but the principles used are the same year after year. I think this is a false issue.

Major Nikon

(36,818 posts)
4. Employee attributes fall under skills, education and/or experience, and competencies
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:47 PM
Jan 2014

Of those things, some jobs rely heavily on skills like truck drivers, aviators, barber/hairstylist, machinists, certain construction jobs, graphic artists, and lots of others. That's not to say someone couldn't pick those proficiencies back up in a short time, but while they are doing so the employer still has to pay them.

JPZenger

(6,819 posts)
6. Here's one take
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:51 PM
Jan 2014

I'm not a HR, but I'll take a guess. I believe the attitudes are some long-term unemployed were too comfortable collecting unemployment checks for 2 years, and didn't feel enough motivation to work during that time. Employers take an attitude that the unemployed job should have been willing to take any job, and not keep looking for a job as good as the one they lost. The attitude is that employers hired back their best employees after layoffs, when the economy got better. Also, the attitude is that some long-term unemployed may have lost their ability to show up on time and work a full day.

It is always easier to get hired for one job when you already have another job. That is why a person should try not to quit a bad job until they have another one lined up.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Any HR People Here? - W...