Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hey! Why the f*ck are we blowing up our soldiers up in Afghanistan? Anyone got a logical reason? (Original Post) grahamhgreen Jan 2014 OP
Because the corporations need to profit from military contracts and what better way Lint Head Jan 2014 #1
So the President has NO control over the military? Lurks Often Jan 2014 #4
Take your pick. n/t tazkcmo Jan 2014 #10
All Presidents are captive to corporate global financies. Not that they're 'not' responsible for Lint Head Jan 2014 #15
Unfortunately it looks to me like the continued war is a crime by international standards, and grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #35
Ah yes, the standard "cabal of shadowy, global financiers" reasoning Lurks Often Jan 2014 #50
In and out would be the correct "simple" plan. But things are not that simple and Lint Head Jan 2014 #56
If Obama expects those lucrative Kelvin Mace Jan 2014 #55
KBR profiteering. Scuba Jan 2014 #2
How dare you! President Obama has ended the Iraq War and is ending the War in cali Jan 2014 #3
but ...but ...but ...the Taliban attacked us on 911. L0oniX Jan 2014 #62
Flag waving PR for the politicians. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2014 #5
The claque will be here shortly to explain Fumesucker Jan 2014 #6
They are busy like vultures on a corpse. Rex Jan 2014 #19
The Pitt and the Pendulum Fumesucker Jan 2014 #20
I think his writting skills might make a few here jelly. Rex Jan 2014 #21
I don't actually agree with Will on this one, but the pack of jackals attacking him is inexcusable. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2014 #27
+1 NuclearDem Jan 2014 #30
I've disagreed over the years with you and Will and several longtime posters Rex Jan 2014 #47
Yes there are a number of them warrant46 Jan 2014 #32
Might be this FiveGoodMen Jan 2014 #7
Which makes it a war of agression and a crime:( grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #36
Absolutely! FiveGoodMen Jan 2014 #39
Not one that would satisfy anyone Progressive dog Jan 2014 #8
I'll take that as a no. No reason. Sensless. Irrational. War. Or war for profit. grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #11
thank you for proving my point Progressive dog Jan 2014 #28
You got a good reason for the killing, or just another dodge? grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #33
thank you yet again Progressive dog Jan 2014 #34
Why are we there? grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #37
I gave you an answer which Progressive dog Jan 2014 #41
The blood is on your hands. grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #49
I got it at first, only killers don't agree with you LOL Progressive dog Jan 2014 #52
“The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who in time of moral crisis, do nothing" - JFK grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #61
We were attacked, multiple times by fanatics who Progressive dog Feb 2014 #65
Pakistan (nukes). I doubt we're terribly concerned with actual Afghanistan now. TwilightGardener Jan 2014 #9
Which makes it a war of agression and a crime:( grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #38
It's a handy hero machine n/t whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #12
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2014 #13
these guys know solarhydrocan Jan 2014 #14
Chilling. grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #45
They need to be there so the Afghans get training so they can leave or something. Octafish Jan 2014 #16
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2014 #17
Well a certain group won't be coming in to this thread anytime soon. Rex Jan 2014 #18
It's so disturbing when you cut to the core argument and they have no answer:( grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #40
YEP. Silence from them...some of whom are prolific posters on DU Rex Jan 2014 #44
Because the colors don't run. Orsino Jan 2014 #22
We're not done digging our plot in the graveyard of empires. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #23
because of those monkey bars.. frylock Jan 2014 #24
Hey it is at DRIVING DISTANCE nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #31
Oh right, the monkey bars, lol. And remember the pen guns, and terrorist dressed up as Santa and grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #42
pakistan pakistan pakistan. also georgee took the forces we needed to iwaq + left the rest to play pansypoo53219 Jan 2014 #25
So they won't blow up our soldiers over here. LuvNewcastle Jan 2014 #26
When was the last time an Afghani blew up a soldier over here? grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #43
That post isn't serious, grahamgreen. LuvNewcastle Jan 2014 #58
You're so bad, lol! grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #59
I don't know about the logic of it but it helps the MIC maintain their lifestyle. jwirr Jan 2014 #29
Follow the money! All wars are a racket! B Calm Jan 2014 #46
More heroes? GeorgeGist Jan 2014 #48
Because. LWolf Jan 2014 #51
That's easy. K&R Egalitarian Thug Jan 2014 #53
I like the way you demonstrated Caretha Feb 2014 #67
Fat cats love money ... 1000words Jan 2014 #54
Junior's incursion into Afghanistan is but one of a plethora of indepat Jan 2014 #57
Watch "Dirty Wars" There is no good reason to be over there. It's a crime against humanity. L0oniX Jan 2014 #60
It's a holding pattern until the next war. CFLDem Feb 2014 #63
who cares. but let's drag out a wounded vet as a dam fool pushes on into the big muddy KG Feb 2014 #64
Because the 1% are still making lotsa this theHandpuppet Feb 2014 #66

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
1. Because the corporations need to profit from military contracts and what better way
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:27 PM
Jan 2014

to continue that money train than to have continuous war.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
4. So the President has NO control over the military?
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:31 PM
Jan 2014

When it comes right down to it you are saying that the President has no control over the U.S. being in Afghanistan or that he is corrupt and has been co-opted by both the military and the corporations.

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
15. All Presidents are captive to corporate global financies. Not that they're 'not' responsible for
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:59 PM
Jan 2014

ginning up war and creating a war footing ideology. It would be simple minded to think such a thing. But once corporate money is tied up in the war machine it's difficult to loosen the tentacles that have a stranglehold on global money. If the rug is suddenly pulled out from under them the ripple effect would impact metal manufacturing, oil, food and more. It takes money to supply feed the war machine. It must be starved slowly.

I say the hell with it all. We do not need to lose another soldier to war. But the hard fact is that we have a voluntary military and the cannon fodder, as the military "bean counters" themselves refer to the possible loss of human beings, is always available to sign up. And that is the result of the economy also. People who do not make a lot of money tend to be the ones who sign up first and that is an economic situation from which greedy corporate contractors feed.

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
35. Unfortunately it looks to me like the continued war is a crime by international standards, and
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 04:21 PM
Jan 2014

as commander in chief he could simply order a withdrawal.

A crime against peace, in international law, refers to "planning, preparation, initiation, or waging of wars of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing" - Nicolas Werth, Karel Bartošek, Jean-Louis Panné, Jean-Louis Margolin, Andrzej Paczkowski, Stéphane Courtois, The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression, Harvard University Press, 1999, hardcover, 858 pages, ISBN 0-674-07608-7, page 5.
 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
50. Ah yes, the standard "cabal of shadowy, global financiers" reasoning
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 05:35 PM
Jan 2014

The far more simple reason is that the United States had legitimate reasons for invading Afghanistan. For a variety of reasons, including a lack of understanding of the tribal role in Afghanistan and the support offered by elements within the Pakistan military, government and intelligence agency, which resulted in a safe haven in Pakistan for the insurgents, we have become bogged down there.

While it is time for the U.S. to leave, for long term political & diplomatic benefits, we need to leave on "our" terms. An unfortunate byproduct of us leaving will be the likely crackdown on women and children and others who do not follow the fundamentalist religious view of those that will probably assume power.

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
56. In and out would be the correct "simple" plan. But things are not that simple and
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 06:05 PM
Jan 2014

I am not talking conspiracy or cabal. I actually know, from personal experience and the deaths that have touched me personally, what I'm talking about. I also know folks, personally within government, who have shared the truth with me. We are not there on our terms.
We have a contract with Karzi and all the stipulations are not divulged because of security issues. If you think wars are ever on anyone's "terms" I think you need to think again.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
55. If Obama expects those lucrative
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 06:04 PM
Jan 2014

board membership jobs after he leaves the White House, he has to feed the beast.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
3. How dare you! President Obama has ended the Iraq War and is ending the War in
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:31 PM
Jan 2014

Afghanistan. He won the Nobel Peace Prize. We're protecting the people of Afghanistan, particularly women. The Taliban is evil and the U.S. is good.

blah fucking blah blah defender/adorer palaver.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
62. but ...but ...but ...the Taliban attacked us on 911.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 07:09 PM
Jan 2014


How stupid can people be to go along with this shit. If you haven't watched "Dirty Wars" ...watch it soon.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
6. The claque will be here shortly to explain
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:36 PM
Jan 2014

I suggest your choice of intoxicant/pain reliever now as a preventative measure

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
19. They are busy like vultures on a corpse.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 02:09 PM
Jan 2014

Right now they are still foaming at the mouth over a Pittance and calling everyone (90%) of the people that replied to the Pittance as 'freepers'. Aren't they a cute bunch of 'DUers'?

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
20. The Pitt and the Pendulum
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 02:20 PM
Jan 2014

I gotta say that our Will knows how to push buttons, he's pushed mine enough times now that I take everything he says with some sodium chloride.



 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
21. I think his writting skills might make a few here jelly.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 02:25 PM
Jan 2014

Dam a pendulum blade AND rats! That's gotta suck!

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
27. I don't actually agree with Will on this one, but the pack of jackals attacking him is inexcusable.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 03:05 PM
Jan 2014

They'd love nothing more than to take down a long-time DUer with a solid liberal reputation outside of DU. It won't work.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
30. +1
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 03:11 PM
Jan 2014

An angry kneejerk reaction in good faith does not put a good liberal in league with the Teabaggers.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
47. I've disagreed over the years with you and Will and several longtime posters
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 04:43 PM
Jan 2014

sometimes to the point of being an ass, but I will also agree that we have the right to our opinion and that it be expressed in a thread so that we may de-construct each others thoughts. It is what makes this place interesting after all these years and sometimes we can have a meaningful conversation as a result.

Getting mad because of blind faith in a leader, nope...that is something I will never do. I don't care what the sacred cow is of the day. Will did go overboard, I won't even pretend that is the first time - but I do agree with him that it is high time to get the hell out of Afghanistan and help the military professionals that might have come home...but are still trapped mentally in some warzone after their 10 deployment.

If war is hell, then it is the duty of Congress and the POTUS to end them as fast as possible imo.

warrant46

(2,205 posts)
32. Yes there are a number of them
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 03:20 PM
Jan 2014

It will be a Fun Fest for a while It will expand the ignore feature for many

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
7. Might be this
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:37 PM
Jan 2014
U.S. agencies estimate Afghanistan’s mineral deposits to be worth upwards of $1 trillion. In fact, a classified Pentagon memo called Afghanistan the “Saudi Arabia of lithium.” (Although lithium is technically not a rare earth element, it serves some of the same

...snip...

The importance of REEs to the global economy cannot be overstated. They are essential to the manufacture of a host of modern technologies, including cell phones, televisions, hybrid engines, computer components, lasers, batteries, fiber optics, and superconductors. Congressional findings have called rare earth elements “critical to national security,” and understandably so. REEs are key to the production of tank navigation systems, missile guidance systems, fighter jet engines, missile defense components, satellites, and military grade communications gear.

http://www.american.com/archive/2013/august/afghanistans-rare-earth-element-bonanza
 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
11. I'll take that as a no. No reason. Sensless. Irrational. War. Or war for profit.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:47 PM
Jan 2014

Which makes it a war crime, btw

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
61. “The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who in time of moral crisis, do nothing" - JFK
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 07:08 PM
Jan 2014

Why are we in this endless war. Should be easy to answer if it's a good reason, if not, let's leave.

Progressive dog

(6,898 posts)
65. We were attacked, multiple times by fanatics who
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:18 AM
Feb 2014

were given a safe haven by the Taliban government of Afghanistan. Bill Clinton tried cruise missile strikes after diplomacy failed. Bush, with tremendous support from the American people and congress, acted to remove the safe haven in Afghanistan by military force.
President Obama was very plain about continuing the Afghan war in 2008. His policy was obvious by 2012 and he won again.
We are not in an endless war, the war is ending.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
9. Pakistan (nukes). I doubt we're terribly concerned with actual Afghanistan now.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:43 PM
Jan 2014

I suppose we'll try to protect some of the shit we built for them, and train their army, but that's about it. I think they're more concerned with that border area. Might also be minerals--but we're not going to be there long enough to control who gets hold of that stuff. Supposedly our presence will wane to just embassy by 2017, if the current plan goes through.

Response to grahamhgreen (Original post)

solarhydrocan

(551 posts)
14. these guys know
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:56 PM
Jan 2014

Joe Biden: "The affirmative task we have now is to actually create a new world order"



Kerry on the New World Order



Backing up Globalization with Military Might
New World Order Onslaught
by Karen Talbot
Covert Action Quarterly, Issue 68, Fall 1999
http://www.globalissues.org/article/448/backing-up-globalization-with-military-might

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
16. They need to be there so the Afghans get training so they can leave or something.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:59 PM
Jan 2014

When he tossed out Donald Rumsfeld's stapler and stand-up desk, not even Robert Gates got a clear answer to your question from the brass.

Response to grahamhgreen (Original post)

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
18. Well a certain group won't be coming in to this thread anytime soon.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 02:06 PM
Jan 2014

They are too busy foaming at the mouth over Will Pitt. They would have to answer your question, which might make Obama look slightly bad...and you know that will never happen with the blind faithful. He can do no wrong ever and you must be Hitler to suggest otherwise!

10 deployments is obscene. The fact that we have no exit strategy to a war that was ignored for ANOTHER war, we started illegally btw, that should have never been started in the first place - makes me ill. We have no objective in Afghanistan anymore, maybe not for years now...we need to get the hell out and NOW!

I watched the Iraqi war tear apart a wonderful family of 4. But I know that doesn't matter to the blind in faith. It seems their binary ways are in full bloom.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
44. YEP. Silence from them...some of whom are prolific posters on DU
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 04:36 PM
Jan 2014

suddenly the cat has their collective tongue it would seem when faced with questions they can not dismiss as 'hatred for XYZ'. If you pay attention, you will notice their absence in quite a few threads about the very topics they seem to be so outraged about.

I think you and I both know why.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
24. because of those monkey bars..
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 02:38 PM
Jan 2014

one of the alleged hijackers trained here at Montgomery Field and lived maybe 20 minutes away from me. Why didn't we attack Clairemont Mesa?

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
31. Hey it is at DRIVING DISTANCE
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 03:16 PM
Jan 2014

from the base for the First Marine Expeditionary force, and where we train Marines. So you could use those recruits as well.



My BIL had as his neighbor one of these guys. They lived a few blocks from Mesa College. Wait, that is within blocks of the National Guard Armory. So the cost in gas should be minimal.

And local press could get some impressive photos. I have enough common sense NOT to go for the Pulitzer on that one.

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
42. Oh right, the monkey bars, lol. And remember the pen guns, and terrorist dressed up as Santa and
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 04:33 PM
Jan 2014

mothers with baby carriages? Then there was the duct tape, and the Cipro......

pansypoo53219

(20,948 posts)
25. pakistan pakistan pakistan. also georgee took the forces we needed to iwaq + left the rest to play
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 03:01 PM
Jan 2014

10 little indians in afghanistan.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
51. Because.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 05:49 PM
Jan 2014

We're a bunch of sociopaths without a social conscience.

"We" being the term you used. In reality, those blowing up people in Afghanistan and elsewhere do so without my support or the support of many.

 

Caretha

(2,737 posts)
67. I like the way you demonstrated
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:15 AM
Feb 2014

your point. I believe you are, if I can use a worn out pun, "Right on the Money!"

I'll interpret your photos the best I can, in case others don't get it.

Pic #1 - The map depicts 2 proposed routes from the Caspian Sea (the largest oil find in the last 40 years, it is almost twice as large as Saudi Arabia's combined oil reserves). This pipeline will cut through Afghanistan and Pakistan to deliver oil to India. So many countries & oil companies have a stake in this, it's quite complicated and incredibly lucrative.

Pic #2 - This pic represents simply a "Butt Load of Money".

Remember this quote? "Bush/Big Oil: Accept our offer of "a carpet of gold or you'll get a carpet of bombs."

indepat

(20,899 posts)
57. Junior's incursion into Afghanistan is but one of a plethora of
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 06:23 PM
Jan 2014

the right-wing's cockamamie initiatives ratified as spot on.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
60. Watch "Dirty Wars" There is no good reason to be over there. It's a crime against humanity.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 07:05 PM
Jan 2014

The Tali-ban did NOT attack us ...fucking evil war mongering MIC profiteers of death. Does Obama own this yet?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hey! Why the f*ck are we ...