Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 10:51 PM Jan 2014

ABC's 20/20 Will Take Up Issue of Children and Guns

ABC's 20/20 will air a show tonight examining children and guns. The show is titled Young Guns and will start at 10:00 p.m. et. It seems that one of the issues that will be discussed during the show is whether teaching children to shoot guns prevents gun accidents. You can use the link below to get more information.

http://abcnews.go.com/2020/t/index

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ABC's 20/20 Will Take Up Issue of Children and Guns (Original Post) erpowers Jan 2014 OP
Guns for kids: Another great idea from the American Firearms Industry Electric Monk Jan 2014 #1
+1 countryjake Feb 2014 #29
13 year olds should not learn about sex, Dawson Leery Jan 2014 #2
Hopefully some of those stories will open some eyes anyway kcr Jan 2014 #4
Guns 101 (Mandatory): Teach kids ABOUT guns. Teach them that guns KILL when not handled properly. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2014 #3
Maybe it's the parents who should be shown those pictures. kcr Jan 2014 #5
I was with you until your 4th paragraph, where you misunderstood the 2nd Amendment. Electric Monk Feb 2014 #6
Wait, what? seattledo Feb 2014 #7
What is an awfully strange notion is that the Framers would "REQUIRE" anything of citizens... cherokeeprogressive Feb 2014 #9
*cough* WELL REGULATED MILITIA *cough* Electric Monk Feb 2014 #10
So your argument is that the Bill of Rights... though it confers no rights whatsoever cherokeeprogressive Feb 2014 #11
Cough cherokeeprogressive Feb 2014 #12
Doesn't really matter what I say, it matters what the 2nd Amendment says, the part you ignore. nt Electric Monk Feb 2014 #16
What does the Second Amendment say? cherokeeprogressive Feb 2014 #21
LMGTFY Electric Monk Feb 2014 #24
Do you understand the Bill of Rights and that it doesn't CONFER rights, rather restricts the cherokeeprogressive Feb 2014 #25
Do you understand that the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 8th have already been trampled on? Electric Monk Feb 2014 #26
Make me puke. Your point? We've let someone trample on our rights... so why stop now? cherokeeprogressive Feb 2014 #28
My point is the 2nd is not inviolate. Already, there are hoops to jump through if you want a Electric Monk Feb 2014 #30
I don't have a problem with that. Don't need a full-auto, nor does ANY civilian. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2014 #31
So, getting back to what started this sub-thread, you admit your 4th paragraph in post 3 was wrong Electric Monk Feb 2014 #32
My fourth paragraph in post 3... no I'll stand by it... cherokeeprogressive Feb 2014 #33
... countryjake Feb 2014 #34
Hello? cherokeeprogressive Feb 2014 #13
Careful or you'll get an auto-ban for spamming. nt Electric Monk Feb 2014 #15
Why? Because you're in charge and you don't like my question? cherokeeprogressive Feb 2014 #17
I noticed you didn't answer. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2014 #18
Then try reading more and posting less. nt Electric Monk Feb 2014 #19
LOL nice non-answer. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2014 #22
? cherokeeprogressive Feb 2014 #23
Constitution got your tongue? cherokeeprogressive Feb 2014 #14
#1 bobclark86 Feb 2014 #8
yeah i don't know why that is a hard concept to grasp for anyone... dionysus Feb 2014 #35
ABC's 20/20 will take up the issue of unfit parents* TheMathieu Feb 2014 #20
The cop & his wife who lost their three yr old was heartbreaking. countryjake Feb 2014 #27

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
29. +1
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 02:56 AM
Feb 2014

There was a father on the show (who once had eight boys) who had trained all of them how to use and properly respect their firearms...he lost his ten year old son when the kids were playing around in the garage, while he was working outside, nearby. The man looked stricken, just telling the story, as were the surviving brothers.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
2. 13 year olds should not learn about sex,
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 11:35 PM
Jan 2014

but kindergarteners should learn about guns.

This is what we are fighting against.

On the other hand, most kids would handle a gun just as poorly as many SWAT team members.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
4. Hopefully some of those stories will open some eyes anyway
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 11:48 PM
Jan 2014

Those parents though their children were safe because they'd taught them gun safety and they were so tragically wrong.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
3. Guns 101 (Mandatory): Teach kids ABOUT guns. Teach them that guns KILL when not handled properly.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 11:47 PM
Jan 2014
NO need to teach them how to shoot. That's a decision they can make later.

SHOW kids what guns do to human bodies. Make them look at PICTURES of human wounds. Make them UNDERSTAND that lives END or are CHANGED FOREVER when guns are mishandled.

Then TELL kids they should NEVER TOUCH guns they find unattended, lest they KILL someone with one accidentally.

After you have sufficiently scared them, tell them The Constitution of the United States of America has, as it's Second Amendment, a promise that the federal government will never infringe upon their right to own one, should they decide they wish to.

Guns 101a (Elective): Teach students how to handle guns. Teach students how to shoot, why, and when.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
5. Maybe it's the parents who should be shown those pictures.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 11:51 PM
Jan 2014

Because I fail to see the difference between kids taught gun safety who then go on to shoot the guns and the ones who don't. There is no difference. They're all kids who have access to guns and it was the guns that killed them. And the reason is because they were kids who had access to guns.

 

seattledo

(295 posts)
7. Wait, what?
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 12:59 AM
Feb 2014

> never infringe upon their right to own one, should they decide they wish to.

That's an awfully strange interpretation of something that requires them to be a member of the militia (National Guard). If you want to be completely truthful, we should tell them that.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
9. What is an awfully strange notion is that the Framers would "REQUIRE" anything of citizens...
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 01:54 AM
Feb 2014

before the federal government could be forbidden from exercising its power over them.

Maybe you should read the Bill of Rights again.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
11. So your argument is that the Bill of Rights... though it confers no rights whatsoever
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 01:59 AM
Feb 2014

contains ONE amendment that the Framers meant to say "You can exercise this right, if FIRST you meet this requirement..."

Yeah? Is that what you're saying?

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
24. LMGTFY
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 02:13 AM
Feb 2014
http://bit.ly/1kpuuVf

Amendment II

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.


What it does NOT say is: "a promise that the federal government will never infringe upon their right to own one" (your words).
 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
25. Do you understand the Bill of Rights and that it doesn't CONFER rights, rather restricts the
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 02:37 AM
Feb 2014

Government's power over citizens?

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
28. Make me puke. Your point? We've let someone trample on our rights... so why stop now?
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 02:53 AM
Feb 2014

What's good for the goose is good for the gander?

Seriousfuckingly?

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
30. My point is the 2nd is not inviolate. Already, there are hoops to jump through if you want a
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 03:00 AM
Feb 2014

fully automatic weapon. That's a restriction. So limits on magazine size, types of bullets (various features, etc) can be legal too. That's why your earlier claim that "a promise that the federal government will never infringe upon their right to own" is simply wrong. It's just a matter of where the line is drawn, not whether there is a line.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
31. I don't have a problem with that. Don't need a full-auto, nor does ANY civilian.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 03:13 AM
Feb 2014

There's a line, to be sure. Small arms are small arms. Some people like to make the argument "so, if I have to allow you a gun, why shouldn't I have to allow you a shoulder fired missile?"

We both know there's a limit to what normal, law abiding civilians should be allowed to possess.

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
32. So, getting back to what started this sub-thread, you admit your 4th paragraph in post 3 was wrong
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 03:18 AM
Feb 2014

after all, and not a good thing to teach children?

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
33. My fourth paragraph in post 3... no I'll stand by it...
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 03:21 AM
Feb 2014

Maybe you can step outside of your comfort zone and ASK me what is wrong with it?

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
22. LOL nice non-answer.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 02:06 AM
Feb 2014

Tell me how the BILL OF RIGHTS says I can exercise a right IF I FIRST MEET A REQUIREMENT.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
35. yeah i don't know why that is a hard concept to grasp for anyone...
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 04:27 AM
Feb 2014

somehow it is, which is mind boggling...

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
27. The cop & his wife who lost their three yr old was heartbreaking.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 02:47 AM
Feb 2014

And the two five year old boys in the very beginning of their "NRA Gun Safety" experiment were the perfect example of fail. They danced around singing the NRA jingle as they touched and poked and fingered that gun.

The program isn't over yet here, I hope this thread survives long enough to get back to a discussion of what 20/20 has illustrated.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ABC's 20/20 Will Take Up ...