Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

global1

(25,241 posts)
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 04:51 PM Feb 2014

Time To Re-Post Once Again My Suggestion Of A National Workers Association (NWA).....

Listening to the SOTU Address the other night and hearing the President talk about income inequality, raising the minimum wage, equal pay for women and re-instating unemployment insurance - and further hearing all the analysis afterwards on some cable news channels and all over the Internet on the Plight of the Worker in the U.S. - I thought it was time to re-post an idea that I posted a couple of times before - I think starting back in 2012.

It's about a National Workers Association.

That was my name for this organization and I will attempt to try again to describe such and organization of workers:

Given the fact that unions in the U.S. are taking hits and union membership is down and the power of unions has been diminished over the years since the Reagan presidency - I'm thinking that we need to look at the plight of the worker in the United States from a different perspective.

Right-to-work laws have contributed to the decreasing role of unions in the U.S. According to Wikipedia a right-to-work law is a statute in the United States of America that prohibits union security agreements, or agreements between labor unions and employers that govern the extent to which an established union can require employees' membership, payment of union dues, or fees as a condition of employment, either before or after hiring.

"Right-to-work" laws do not, as the short phrase might suggest, aim to provide a general guarantee of employment to people seeking work, but rather are a government regulation of the contractual agreements between employers and labor unions that prevents them from excluding non-union workers.

Because right-to-work laws have impacted the worker and workers rights, wages and unions in the U.S. then it seems to me that we have to come up with a different and new way of promoting workers rights in the U.S. I'm thinking that we need to model a workers rights organization after the National Rifle Association model. The NRA has become a formidable lobbying group for gun owners and proponents of gun rights. The NRA has done this with a membership of 4.3 million. With the population of the U.S. at approximately 312.8 million people this means the NRA membership is approximately 1.37% of the total population of the United States.

Note: This post is not about gun control nor does it have anything to do with the recent wave of gun tragedies. This post is about 'workers rights'. Please don't make this a post about gun control - I simply am using the NRA as an example of an effective organization.

According to Wikipedia in June 2009 there were 306, 000, 000 people living in the United States of which there were about 155,000,000 people that are employed. This means that approximate 51% of the U.S. population would be classified as workers.

If we were able to form an organization of workers where workers would pay a membership fee to join - just like the NRA - and if we were able to convince about 26% of the work force to join - an organization of workers could have a membership of 40,000,000 people compared to 4,300,000 million members of the NRA or approximately a 10 fold increase over the number of members in the NRA. If the NRA has been able to become a formidable lobbying force in this country with 4.3 million members - just think what a National Workers Association could become with 40 million members.

Every worker or potential worker would be eligible to become a member of the NWA. Membership dues could be nominal at $35.00 per year per worker. That would net such an organization $1.4 billion dollars. Just think of the power that this amount of money would bring to lobbying for workers and promoting workers rights to combat the push back we as workers are getting from the corporations that are running this country.

Now what would this organization be called and what would it stand for. Here is my first attempt at trying to describe such and organization of workers:

Note: consider this a work in process.

"The National Workers Association of America (NWA) would be organized as an American non-profit 501(c)(4) lobbying group that advocates for the protection of working people in the United States, and the promotion of workers rights including the right to work; free choice of employment; just and favorable conditions of work and unemployment protection. The NWA would support the right to equal treatment, regardless of gender, origin and appearance, religion, sexual orientation. Equal pay for equal work; just and favorable remuneration ensuring the worker and his/her family an existence worthy of human dignity and the right to rest and leisure, with reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

The NWA could have an education component and sponsor training courses in career building, skills training, resume composition, resume posting, interviewing skills and provide assistance with short term vocational training, supportive services to obtain GED placement, vocational rehabilitation. The NWA could provide members with a job registry including job search advice. The NWA would make available salary surveys/advice, human resource and unemployment assistance. It would also be a clearing house for programs that would provide workers career counseling and retraining for new careers. "

Again - looking at the NRA as an example of an effective organization - the NWA could have state and local chapters. It could initially be organized around current unions and they could immediately become the core of such an organization. The NWA could have local, state and national meetings. The NWA could have a monthly journal and newsletter and of course a website - complete with all the social networking tools that are available (i.e., Twitter, Facebook, etc). There could be specialty sections in the NWA that align around groups of workers (i.e., hotel workers; restaurant workers; plumbers; electricians; truckers; etc) in order to give all workers a voice.

The point being is that we as workers need someone to go to bat for us and we need to have the lobbying muscle to compete with the corporations. With the formation of an NWA - we would be going to bat for ourselves.

I'm tired of all the strong rhetoric that goes on before an election and then the 'bait and switch' weaseling that goes on after pols are elected. It's time that we organize and have and apply leverage in order to protect our interests. I'm thinking that our elected officials would take heed and listen to such an organization with such a voice.

I'm throwing this idea out there again and am looking for some constructive criticism in the formation of such an entity. It seems to me that we can do anything that we set our mind to and a National Workers Association would go a long way in giving the common worker in the U.S. to prevent any additional erosion of "Jobs In America".

What do my fellow DU'ers out there think about this?

Here is a link to my original post and other posts on this topic. Much of what is in the Original Posts in these following links is the same as what you have just read. You don't have to re-read that. I urge you though to scroll down and read all the responses that fellow DU'ers posted. There seems to be a lot of support for a National Workers Association and many great ideas as to how to enhance such an organization.

Here are the links to my previous posts:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022032941

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2814143

If you think this concept is an idea whose time has come and are in support of such an entity - PLEASE PUT IT OUT THERE ON FACEBOOK AND TWITTER - PASS IT ON TO PROGRESSIVE RADIO AND TV HOSTS TO GET THE WORD OUT. MAKE IT GO VIRAL.

I really don't know how to take this idea to the next step - but if we get the word out and get more people interested in this idea - then maybe someone that has the knowledge to organize such an entity will do just that. It has to be someone who is a friend to the Plight of the Worker in the U.S.. We can't let this idea be stolen by corporations or conservative groups that could subvert it.

Any and all comments are welcome.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Time To Re-Post Once Again My Suggestion Of A National Workers Association (NWA)..... (Original Post) global1 Feb 2014 OP
You are a wobblie! Warren Stupidity Feb 2014 #1
What's A Wobblie?.... global1 Feb 2014 #2
IWW anarcho-syndicalist union of Warren Stupidity Feb 2014 #6
You Lost Me On This One.... global1 Feb 2014 #9
Google the Industrial Workers of the World..... socialist_n_TN Feb 2014 #13
It's time to think global. That's the playing field, now. 1000words Feb 2014 #3
Employees vs Workers Basic LA Feb 2014 #4
Thank You For Your Input.... global1 Feb 2014 #7
I see you're unfamiliar with the musical stylings of Ice Cube, Dr. Dre, Easy E and company. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2014 #5
I Did Say This Is A Work In Process..... global1 Feb 2014 #8
Ha I was gonna point this out. flying rabbit Feb 2014 #10
Join the Wobblies - the Union for Everyone. Manifestor_of_Light Feb 2014 #11
How Come We Don't Hear About This IWW?..... global1 Feb 2014 #12
I suggested the same thing many years ago - to Robert Reich hfojvt Feb 2014 #14

global1

(25,241 posts)
2. What's A Wobblie?....
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 05:48 PM
Feb 2014

And right now I'd be satisfied to start this movement right here in the U.S.. Today the U.S. - Tomorrow the world.

global1

(25,241 posts)
9. You Lost Me On This One....
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 07:59 PM
Feb 2014

Anarcho-syndicalist union sounds ominous. Are you saying that there is something already that exists that is kind of like the concept I proposed in my OP? Help me here.

I kind of would like to keep this simple - and with a name and a mission that any 'employee' would understand. I guess if I was asked to join something that had 'anarcho-syndicalist' in the name - I wouldn't give it the time of day.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
13. Google the Industrial Workers of the World.....
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:05 PM
Feb 2014

They are also known as the Wobblies. A militant anti-capitalist union that didn't believe in craft/trade union divisions. All workers in all crafts and trades in one big union.

 

1000words

(7,051 posts)
3. It's time to think global. That's the playing field, now.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 05:54 PM
Feb 2014

This is a good a place to start, but the end game must be uniting all workers, worldwide.

Rec

 

Basic LA

(2,047 posts)
4. Employees vs Workers
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 07:02 PM
Feb 2014

I applaud your efforts to unite Employees, but believe outdated terms such as Workers & Labor are counterproductive. Employees do not identify themselves as Workers or Labor, as in previous centuries, but almost everyone is an Employee, including the Self-Employed (who have the meanest boss) .
Employees Unite!

global1

(25,241 posts)
7. Thank You For Your Input....
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 07:30 PM
Feb 2014

I have no problem using employees vs workers. Good suggestion!!!! Please kick and recommend this post in order to get others to see it and add their suggestions/comments.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
5. I see you're unfamiliar with the musical stylings of Ice Cube, Dr. Dre, Easy E and company.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 07:15 PM
Feb 2014

Perhaps a name change would be in order.

global1

(25,241 posts)
8. I Did Say This Is A Work In Process.....
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 07:55 PM
Feb 2014

thanks for the heads up on the other NWA. Any suggestions for a name change for my concept. Based on one of the posts in this thread - it was suggested that we substitute 'employee' for 'worker'. That would make it the NEA - which I'm sure someone has that grouping of letters already for some other organization.

When I first posted this someone suggested National Employees & Workers or NEW which I really liked. However, as seen in another post in this thread - worker is an outdated word. So I guess that wouldn't work either.




global1

(25,241 posts)
12. How Come We Don't Hear About This IWW?.....
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 08:30 PM
Feb 2014

I didn't know something like this exists. Do they promote themselves? How do they promote themselves.

Again - I wasn't looking at forming a union - as union is a incendiary word - and there are a lot of people that have a negative feeling for unions and probably wouldn't join.
I was looking to form more of an association - with an NRA model - with a nominal yearly membership fee of $35.00.

Another model to structure this after is the AARP - which is supposedly an association of Retired People. I don't know much about the total membership of AARP - but I know when issues come up that have an effect on the retired - the AARP mobilizes and lobbies for the retired people.

My thought was - in numbers there is power. If we could get a substantial number of employees to join such an association - with the nominal dues money coming together - it has the potential to become a powerful lobbying aid.

Certainly - unions seem to be dying - but if one takes out the term union and makes it palatable for employees of every facet of life to join - it could become formidable.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
14. I suggested the same thing many years ago - to Robert Reich
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:15 PM
Feb 2014

I called it the AAWP.

Instead of the AARP this is the American Association of WORKING People.

I guess they could send people letters upon reaching their 16th birthday inviting them to join, much like the AARP keeps sending me letters now that I have turned 50.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Time To Re-Post Once Agai...