Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 03:17 AM Feb 2014

Smearmaster Greenwald's smear campaign against George W. Bush

AS they say - haters are going to hate and smearers are going to smear. Greenwald did not begin his smear career with President Obama - he was doing it way back before Obama came to the White House. It seems that he thinks that just because someone is in powerful position - that they are supposed to be criticized - Imagine that!~!

2008 Bill Moyer interview with Glenn Greenwald about the George W. Bush legacy


http://billmoyers.com/content/glenn-greenwald-on-the-george-w-bush-administration-and-the-rule-of-law/

He also wrote three books about the George W. Bush Administration; The New York Times-bestsellers How Would A Patriot Act? (2006) and Tragic Legacy (2007), and his 2008 release, Great American Hypocrites.

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Smearmaster Greenwald's smear campaign against George W. Bush (Original Post) Douglas Carpenter Feb 2014 OP
I wouldn't worry about the desperate attempts to silence him. Greenwald was and is one of the sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #1
the interview with Moyers was interesting. grasswire Feb 2014 #2
Excuse me, are you trying to drum up sympathy for "W" HERE? Demeter Feb 2014 #3
EXACTLY - I love George W.Bush and I hate Greenwald Douglas Carpenter Feb 2014 #5
I get your sense of humor. I hope a jury does too, if some douchebag alerts on you. nt Electric Monk Feb 2014 #6
is it really necessary to always use the Douglas Carpenter Feb 2014 #7
There are many here who are sarchasm challenged. hobbit709 Feb 2014 #16
No. Hissyspit Feb 2014 #10
I think it's time for Greenwald to publish Volume II of Great American Hypocrites n/t Fumesucker Feb 2014 #4
K&R DeSwiss Feb 2014 #8
Yeah this thread will be ignored by the Usual Suspects. Rex Feb 2014 #9
Ironically they support a lot of Bush's policies..... ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2014 #27
lol... this is .. lol.. While the rats were jumping ship of fuckin course its easy to bash Bush... uponit7771 Feb 2014 #11
AMEN! it was nobodies business what the government was doing in secret under Bush and it is nobodies Douglas Carpenter Feb 2014 #12
Cept Snowglen didn't "try" to tell the public just about governments actions.. snowglen defenders uponit7771 Feb 2014 #14
A jury of pears? What a sight to see! Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #18
..and then they spell cheKk you... a common wingerish deflection uponit7771 Feb 2014 #21
Gad! Those liberal ideologues are disgusting Fumesucker Feb 2014 #13
you mean he's not a racist???? Doctor_J Feb 2014 #15
Along with Francis, Greenwald provides the dog whistles they love! Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #19
K & R GoneFishin Feb 2014 #17
You know what they say about broken clocks, D.C. =) nt AverageJoe90 Feb 2014 #20
K+R eom Agony Feb 2014 #22
Um.. the only truth about GWB is smeary. ananda Feb 2014 #23
another Douglas Carpenter Feb 2014 #24
one Douglas Carpenter Feb 2014 #25
Greenwald knew. He #%^*ing knew. MannyGoldstein Feb 2014 #26

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
1. I wouldn't worry about the desperate attempts to silence him. Greenwald was and is one of the
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 03:24 AM
Feb 2014

liberal blogosphere's most respected journalists.

I am of the opinion that the HB Gary bid for a contract to smear him when he began writing about Bank Corruption, specifically BOA, exposed by Anonymous, was given to someone else.

Did you ever read the emails in which they discussed HOW to smear him? Disgusting garbage, and back then he was not even that well known. It should scare people to death to know that they hire 'Security Contractors' to SMEAR Liberal Bloggers, most especially the ones who have the courage to tell the truth.

I'd love to know who got the contract this time. But there WAS supposed to be an investigation in Congress over that entire episode. So far it hasn't happened.

Smearing journalists only makes people angry. Even people who don't know them or agree with them always, are prompted to defend them because most intelligent people understand the threat to this democracy that the smearing and attempts to silence journalists would be.

The more I see the smears the more I am hoping Anonymous will strike again and reveal which of our Security Contractors are doing it this time.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
3. Excuse me, are you trying to drum up sympathy for "W" HERE?
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 04:14 AM
Feb 2014

and furthermore, to do it by trying to smear Greenwald?

I could have sworn I was logged into DU, but let me check...

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
7. is it really necessary to always use the
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 05:07 AM
Feb 2014
tag? - please don't tell me that there are people here who are more or less in agreement with my position who can possibly be that thick - I would prefer to believe that progressives are a little bit more clever than that. I would prefer to believe that liberals and progressive are a little bit more switched on than the right-wing nuts - but sometimes - when I see some comments here on this forum -l I am forced to reconsider by liberal elitist assumptions
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
9. Yeah this thread will be ignored by the Usual Suspects.
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 05:21 AM
Feb 2014

Much easier for them to think he loved Bush. Helps with their narrative.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
11. lol... this is .. lol.. While the rats were jumping ship of fuckin course its easy to bash Bush...
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 06:07 AM
Feb 2014

... but this wasn't Greenwalds position WHILE everyone was going giddy of Bush in a flight suite!!!

Obama, on the other hand, while it was politically the wrong thing to do was doing the moral right thing in speaking out against Bush's war.

Greenwald?

not so much

FUCK SnowGlen, traitorous...and at the LEAST careless bastards

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
12. AMEN! it was nobodies business what the government was doing in secret under Bush and it is nobodies
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 06:15 AM
Feb 2014

business what the government is doing in secret under Obama!! ANYONE - ANYONE who tries to tell the public is traitorous scum!!

If you criticize the government - the terrorist have already won!

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
14. Cept Snowglen didn't "try" to tell the public just about governments actions.. snowglen defenders
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 06:31 AM
Feb 2014

..like to leave that little tidbit out of the story.

This look like a shakedown from the beginning...

Now SnowGlen look even more hypocritical; they think the public should see everything because it should be part of the discussion of whether or not the spy agencies are going to far but a jury of SnowGlens pears shouldn't be able to see if these two bastards broke any laws...

They're full of shit

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
18. A jury of pears? What a sight to see!
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 10:39 AM
Feb 2014

The name calling voids any argument you might have. The fact that you misspell 'peers' in a rush to type insulting semi homophobic insults is amusing.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
13. Gad! Those liberal ideologues are disgusting
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 06:16 AM
Feb 2014

Greenwald should be ashamed of himself for bashing a great leader like Commander Codpiece.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
15. you mean he's not a racist????
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 09:33 AM
Feb 2014

He really just doesn't like abusive government??? Oh shit! I wonder if the BOG will stop bombing all of the threads with Greenwald in the subject line.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
19. Along with Francis, Greenwald provides the dog whistles they love!
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 10:41 AM
Feb 2014

The anti gay subtext is fat and saucy.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
26. Greenwald knew. He #%^*ing knew.
Sun Feb 23, 2014, 02:10 AM
Feb 2014

He knew we'd have a Democratic president one day, and he'd need to look "impartial" when he attacked that president. So he and Ron Paul wrote those books with the close cooperation of Queen Elizabeth and Vladimir Putin.

Won't Liberals ever learn?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Smearmaster Greenwald's s...