Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ellenrr

(3,864 posts)
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 08:27 AM Feb 2014

Chomsky on superbowl

The prolific author, media critic and liberal activist and commentator is quoted in his 1992 book “Manufacturing Consent” saying that sports are part of a propagandist “indoctrination system” meant to distract “Joe Six Pack” from “things that matter.”

“The purpose of those media is just to dull people’s brains,” he said. “This is an oversimplification, but for the 80 percent or whatever they are, the main thing is to divert them. To get them to watch National Football League.”

t’s a way of building up irrational attitudes of submission to authority, and group cohesion behind leadership elements — in fact, it’s training in irrational jingoism,” Chomsky wrote. “That’s also a feature of competitive sports. I think if you look closely at these things, I think, typically, they do have functions, and that’s why energy is devoted to supporting them and creating a basis for them and advertisers are willing to pay for them and so on.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/11/13/broncos-lineman-cites-noam-chomsky-as-a-reason-for-quitting-nfl/#ixzz2sFrg8Jnx

63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chomsky on superbowl (Original Post) ellenrr Feb 2014 OP
Chomsky's just an uber nerd who hates jocks Fumesucker Feb 2014 #1
Tucker Carlson's winger rag quoting Chomsky? Wow..the far right and the far left msanthrope Feb 2014 #2
it's actually John Moffitt that quoted Chomsky Enrique Feb 2014 #5
It's done to make the left look bad Renew Deal Feb 2014 #9
+1...nt SidDithers Feb 2014 #12
It's far easier to forgive someone for being wrong than it is for being right Fumesucker Feb 2014 #22
It's a good article. A Bronco's lineman came to the realization that risking his health for money sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #28
I remember a history book quoting Stalin. Wow! Academics and Stalmists seldom come together so rarel LanternWaste Feb 2014 #33
I ain't saying he's wrong, but.... Adrahil Feb 2014 #3
But why one activity and not another Shankapotomus Feb 2014 #14
Do other nations do that? Brickbat Feb 2014 #26
There are lectures that occur annually in probably every nation Shankapotomus Feb 2014 #55
Different Strokes For Different Folks! FrodosPet Feb 2014 #29
It's only Rock and Roll... but I like it OKNancy Feb 2014 #4
Good grief! HappyMe Feb 2014 #6
But see if you weren't having any fun you'd be inspired to over through the oppressive el_bryanto Feb 2014 #41
Ah, now I see where I'm wrong! HappyMe Feb 2014 #43
Who cares? Renew Deal Feb 2014 #7
I've heard of Chomsky a lot JonLP24 Feb 2014 #20
He is right and it is amazing how well it works. CBGLuthier Feb 2014 #8
In GD, our "causes" are Bieber, Woody & Mia, Coke, Eleanors38 Feb 2014 #15
The same could be said for movies, HappyMe Feb 2014 #24
What, are you incapable of paying attention to more than one thing at once? sir pball Feb 2014 #31
You're right... Blanks Feb 2014 #40
It's not the sport itself, it's the taking over of the sport by Corporations including the MIC sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #60
It's easy to dismiss this idea LWolf Feb 2014 #10
+1 woo me with science Feb 2014 #36
+1 leftstreet Feb 2014 #42
Ouch DireStrike Feb 2014 #61
Daily Caller?... SidDithers Feb 2014 #11
A Bronco's lineman has given up a lucrative career. Why? Because he's smart. sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #30
... SidDithers Feb 2014 #54
No, this is someone who no longer falls for the 'them' V 'us' garbage. Like Pat Tillman, another sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #62
"Who cares what Tucker Carlson thinks of Chomsky?" wow we agree ...it's a miracle I tell ya. L0oniX Feb 2014 #48
IMO, this is right wingers putting up a "Look!! Lefties hate football!!" article... SidDithers Feb 2014 #49
Panem et circensis... /nt jakeXT Feb 2014 #13
Exactly right as usual. ananda Feb 2014 #16
Oh, fuck Chomsky. It's been 2,000 years since... TreasonousBastard Feb 2014 #17
George Orwell said something similar about football in the UK... truebrit71 Feb 2014 #35
Opiate of the masses LiberalEsto Feb 2014 #18
The reason why there is energy devoted to supporting them is because there is a demand for them JonLP24 Feb 2014 #19
I don't believe the point was that people shouldn't be interested in sports. sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #32
I have no issue with the player's choice JonLP24 Feb 2014 #37
I watched the Super Bowl last night. I saw more ads in the first quarter than sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #39
Do you mean commercial ads or ad banners in the stadium? JonLP24 Feb 2014 #47
Promoting faux patriotism could be an indication that there is a failing of an agenda. L0oniX Feb 2014 #46
"Saying 'I'm not happy at all,' Broncos' John Moffitt quits NFL" (edited with ap title) Cerridwen Feb 2014 #21
No more so than movies or video games LittleBlue Feb 2014 #23
Sometimes people just want to watch a football game. Chorophyll Feb 2014 #25
There are those of us who can watch sports and still care about issues. Human beings need liberal_at_heart Feb 2014 #27
Rec for Chomsky, the Dalai Lama and a Professional Football player who gets sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #34
Dang. I thought Noam was going to critique the Seahawks' adjustment to depart from BlueStreak Feb 2014 #38
Chomsky in context as presented in Manufacturing Consent (1992 interviews) Cerridwen Feb 2014 #44
I love watching rich people toss a ball around. L0oniX Feb 2014 #45
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2014 #50
Jingoism training. JEB Feb 2014 #51
I agree, yet, notwithstanding Mr. Chomsky.. cilla4progress Feb 2014 #52
He is right. Dawson Leery Feb 2014 #53
K&R Entertainment is our top priority, nothing else comes close. Egalitarian Thug Feb 2014 #56
If my head's filled with NFL, it's not filled with income inequality... Octafish Feb 2014 #57
Some of us can walk and chew gum at the same time ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2014 #58
note to self. take chomsky off invite list for super bowl party nt arely staircase Feb 2014 #59
You'll be sorry. He makes a pretty mean 7-layer dip. Arugula Latte Feb 2014 #63

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
1. Chomsky's just an uber nerd who hates jocks
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 08:35 AM
Feb 2014

Someone will be saying that seriously here in a few moments, the very definition of ad hominem.



 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
2. Tucker Carlson's winger rag quoting Chomsky? Wow..the far right and the far left
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 08:46 AM
Feb 2014

seldom come together so stupidly.....

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
5. it's actually John Moffitt that quoted Chomsky
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 08:55 AM
Feb 2014

and yes the DC is a winger rag but this story is fascinating and I think it should have been picked up by more outlets.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
22. It's far easier to forgive someone for being wrong than it is for being right
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 10:35 AM
Feb 2014

The major reason Chomsky raises so many hackles and makes the left "look bad".



sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
28. It's a good article. A Bronco's lineman came to the realization that risking his health for money
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 11:21 AM
Feb 2014

and jingoism etc wasn't worth it so he gave up the money and has decided to spend more time with his little daughter and his family.

He has been reading Chomsky and the Dalai Lama, seems like he's smart enough not to become a commodity for big business. I noticed how many Corps were promoters of the SB last night btw.

Did it occur to you that your comment demonstrates what Chomsky was saying very clearly? Just wondering if you got it, it actually made me laugh to see such a perfect example of the point he made.

It looks like Moffit is a very smart guy. The comment section is very interesting also. Some desperately defensive of their 'team' while others actually get Chomsky's point.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
33. I remember a history book quoting Stalin. Wow! Academics and Stalmists seldom come together so rarel
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 11:35 AM
Feb 2014

I remember a history book quoting Stalin. Wow! Academics and Stalmists seldom come together so rarely...?

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
3. I ain't saying he's wrong, but....
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 08:53 AM
Feb 2014

... FFS, we can't go around being worried about "things that matter" all the time. Some times people want to enjoy some food and drink with some friends... Nothing wrong with that. Perhaps the only entertainment we should enjoy is singing worker's anthems?

Meh, sometimes I think folks need to to turn it down to 6 or so for a bit. And this comes form someone with no interest in sports at all. Except bowling. I love to go bowling.


Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
14. But why one activity and not another
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 09:34 AM
Feb 2014

Why don't we all gather around the TV as a nation to watch an annual science lecture rather than a violent sporting event?

Maybe because our national entertainment preferences are stuck on stupid?

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
55. There are lectures that occur annually in probably every nation
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:51 PM
Feb 2014

Here's an annual lecture: http://www.nelsonmandela.org/content/page/annual-lecture

Are they celebrated to the extent the way a violent sport is celebrated? No. And that's the whole problem.

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
4. It's only Rock and Roll... but I like it
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 08:54 AM
Feb 2014

A life with out diversions, be it sports, music, art, dance is what dulls the brain.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
6. Good grief!
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 09:00 AM
Feb 2014

Last edited Mon Feb 3, 2014, 09:36 AM - Edit history (1)

I think going through life without any fun isn't much of a life at all.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
41. But see if you weren't having any fun you'd be inspired to over through the oppressive
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 12:05 PM
Feb 2014

capitalist state.

Or so the argument goes.

Bryant

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
43. Ah, now I see where I'm wrong!
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 12:10 PM
Feb 2014


I'll try harder to be angry, sour and generally crabby more. Or not.

Yours in complete bitterness,
HM

Renew Deal

(81,856 posts)
7. Who cares?
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 09:24 AM
Feb 2014

Chomsky's point is that we should all live in misery lamenting the cruel world. There are lots of people with this point of view and too many of them are on the left.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
20. I've heard of Chomsky a lot
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 10:33 AM
Feb 2014

but I don't know anything about it. I'm guessing he is someone that is paid to give his opinion? If that is the case, this sample has me wondering why but then again, Beck, O'Reilly, and countless other loons are paid well to give their opinion so it shouldn't surprise me.

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
8. He is right and it is amazing how well it works.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 09:26 AM
Feb 2014

Plenty of proof available right here.

Fuck the cause we got us some football. Wooheee.

sir pball

(4,741 posts)
31. What, are you incapable of paying attention to more than one thing at once?
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 11:32 AM
Feb 2014

Or do you just live for "the cause" every single waking moment of your life? No hobbies, recreations, or distractions whatsoever? I can't imagine how intellectually and emotionally tiresome that must get.

(I didn't watch the game, BTW)

Blanks

(4,835 posts)
40. You're right...
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 12:01 PM
Feb 2014

I like entertainment, but the amount of attention our society pays to football is pitiful. I watched the game, it isn't the game itself that's 'bad' it's that our entire society is worked into a frenzy for weeks building up to it - and if we aren't, there's something wrong with us. It's just one game that isn't significantly different than hundreds of other games in the preceding weeks and months (in this case - not even as good).

It isn't just football either. All of the other 'entertainment' is just recycled and/or redundant too.

Once upon a time, Grimm, Dracula - all shit that's been around for literally centuries and is supposed to pass for adult entertainment at a time when people are losing their houses and jobs.

There is something wrong with us.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
60. It's not the sport itself, it's the taking over of the sport by Corporations including the MIC
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 07:54 PM
Feb 2014

that Chomsky AND the Dalia Lama are speaking about.

Last night watching the Super Bowl, a SPORT, we had to endure every three minutes in the first quarter, multiple ads, (what was going on with the actual game while we had to watch ads? I have no idea) including 'support the troops' jingoism.

It's not even subtle anymore. BOA, the MIC, all are now involved in this 'sport'. Chomsky and the Dalai Lama are not condemning the sport, they are condemning using the sport to promote the agenda of Corporate and MIC interests. Do we really need to be subjected to 'support the troops' (when we know THEY don't) propaganda, when tuning in to watch a GAME?

Moffit, the Broncos linesman sees the scam and has chose to opt out, which no doubt will cost him millions. I admire him, as I admired another football hero, Pat Tiller, who saw the scam for what it was and chose to say 'no' to all that money and go for what is really important in this world.

Both, btw, read Chomsky. And both were smart enough to 'get' what he was trying to say.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
10. It's easy to dismiss this idea
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 09:27 AM
Feb 2014

unless one looks at how closely political parties resemble NFL teams and their fans.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
30. A Bronco's lineman has given up a lucrative career. Why? Because he's smart.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 11:26 AM
Feb 2014

He has decided not to risk his health for money and spend more time with his daughter and family.

He's been reading Chompsky and the Dalai Lama and agrees with them about the points they regarding jingoism and submitting oneself to authority etc.

Did you realize your comment totally demonstrates the point made by Chomsky and the Dalai Lama?

Just wondering .....

Great comment section there also. Some surprisingly intelligent comments regarding 'getting' Moffit's decision to be independent of big business rather than risk his own well-being.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
54. ...
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 02:38 PM
Feb 2014


For someone who thinks themself so politically astute, it's amazing how often you completely miss the point.

Carlson's website is using Chomsky's comments and Moffitt's decision to attack the left.

Sid

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
62. No, this is someone who no longer falls for the 'them' V 'us' garbage. Like Pat Tillman, another
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 08:04 PM
Feb 2014

football player who initially bought into the jingoism and the scam, Moffit is SMART. Both ended up looking for something to confirm their own sense that 'something is wrong here' and ended up reading those Leftie 'intellectual writes', like the Dalai Lama and Chomsky among others'.

It's stunning how some people totally don't get it.

The comments attached to that article demonstrate how much further along the way we are to the American people refusing to be divided by the propaganda of division and towards UNITING against the Corporate powers that up to now, have taken over this country. But not for very long now that the public is more and more aware of the scam.

Kudos to Moffitt and Tillman among others who after all, were not as 'stupid' as the morons who have been stealing this country's treasures, lives, finances etc and who will have enormous influence over others who have not yet awakened to the scam.

It was a good article and the comment sections demonstrates that the American people are not as easily influenced as those morons who have been stealing and hoarding our tax dollars, thought.

Thank YOU Pat Tillman and Moffitt for taking a stand against the worst scam that has been perpetrated against this country for decades.

And fyi, I really don't care who publishes the story so you are wasting your time trying to save us poor, ignorant Americans from reading material YOU deem inappropriate. You can't do it, we will continue to choose our own sources because contrary to your opinion of us, we are way smarter than the foreign opinion of Americans who you appear to believe, need censors to help us with our reading choices.

THANK YOU PAT TILLMAN, MOFFIT, CHOMSKY and the DALAI LAMA and thanks to those who keep us informed of these issues.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
49. IMO, this is right wingers putting up a "Look!! Lefties hate football!!" article...
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 12:35 PM
Feb 2014

They're throwing raw meat to their mouth-breathing followers.

Sid

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
17. Oh, fuck Chomsky. It's been 2,000 years since...
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 10:13 AM
Feb 2014

Bread and Circuses ran the Roman Empire into decline and he just gets it in 1992?

Outlaw soccer and basketball while we're at it.

 

LiberalEsto

(22,845 posts)
18. Opiate of the masses
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 10:17 AM
Feb 2014

Now watch this shiny coin swing back and forth...back and forth...back and forth...

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
19. The reason why there is energy devoted to supporting them is because there is a demand for them
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 10:18 AM
Feb 2014

The reason why advertisers are willing to pay for them is because there a lot of potential consumers. Not sure what he means exactly but everyone has hobbies. If it isn't the NFL it's something else.

on edit - The idea that the reason why there are sports because of some nefarious intention is crazy. People interested in making some money organized some teams signed players and sold tickets. Who runs this "indoctrinated system" and why do they worry about creating sports leagues when they would be created without them?

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
32. I don't believe the point was that people shouldn't be interested in sports.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 11:34 AM
Feb 2014

I believe the Bronco lineman, Moffitt who has been reading Chomsky and the Dalai Lama, according to the article, agreed with the points they have made, which are not that 'sports are evil'.

Maybe more like USING or MISUSING people's interest in sports, (have you noticed the corporate control of professional football eg) to promote faux patriotism, rather than just enjoy the game for the sake of the game.

Moffitt has decided to give up all that money because he isn't willing to be part of all the hype and risk his own health or participate in the jingoism because he cares more about other more important things.

It's refreshing to learn that a professional football player is putting his money where his mouth is and actually thinking about what is really important in life. In his case, his five year old daughter and the rest of his family, AND his and their future.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
37. I have no issue with the player's choice
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 11:48 AM
Feb 2014

He has his health and family to think about, I applaud him for his choice.

I just had issue with how Chomsky put what he said the way he said it. As far as all the spectacles surrounding it I ignore it but if it was turning people away from the game they'd stop it in a heart beat.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
39. I watched the Super Bowl last night. I saw more ads in the first quarter than
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 11:57 AM
Feb 2014

football. I saw jingoism, military promotion, big Corporations and Banks, BOA eg, participating through ads etc. There were so many distractions from the game itself, I think we counted an ad every three minutes in the first quarter at least eg, that it was hard to stay interested.

And then I remember going to football games that were just about the game. College games where there were no ads or promotions or reminders that we are 'at war' etc etc.

I do not believe that Chomsky or the Dalai Lama are talking about sports, I believe they are talking about the hi-jacking of sports for huge profits and for promoting a lot of what I saw last night and not so subliminally either.

Flag waving, jingoism, HUGE obscene amounts of money takes away from the 'sport' aspect of a game like football. It is all so commercial now that it's hard to wade through the money and get to the game.

I give great credit to anyone who can walk away from all the money based on having more important things on his mind.

Even more for taking the time to read and think and apply that thinking to his own and his family's lives.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
47. Do you mean commercial ads or ad banners in the stadium?
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 12:32 PM
Feb 2014

NFL/Networks accepting large amounts of money from companies to show an ad don't bother me. I prefer the game to be a business if people are pouring large amounts of money into it like with anything.

I actually have big problems with the NFL and other North American Sports leagues as well as the NCAA business practices. The NFL and its owners excercising their leverage over cities for large subsidies is very sickening. They do it because they can and cities/counties/states with budget deficits end up making cuts, cutting jobs such as firemen, etc. so they can pay the bill for 30 years when the owner will likely come back in 10-15 years saying the stadium is obsolete and seek renovations sooner than that. Profiting off taxpayers is a really sick aspect of their business.

NCAA bothers me because of the rule that you can't pay college athletes. Networks, coaches, everyone makes big money except for the people which are the reason they make so much money. The 'student-athlete' term was created when the NCAA lost a case in the 50's in Colorado where a judge ruled they had to pay workman's comp for an athletes injury. Plus they give 1-year scholarships for no other reason than to give the coach the freedom to cut him at season's end if he doesn't play well. Don't buy into the myth, the NCAA is a monopsonistic cartel that sees it as more profitable to compensate athletes with scholarships, stipends rather than compete for their services in the open market like they do for coaches.

I enjoy watching the game so much that I still support the product despite these business practices. They get away with it too because people don't look it as much as a business but if money is flowing in they should. No one would put up with it any other kind of business where the labor that makes it as possible is paid a very small portion of the profits, let alone a business that generates TWICE the revenue of the NFL.

Sorry you had me going but you had me look at why I still support the game against my better judgment.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
46. Promoting faux patriotism could be an indication that there is a failing of an agenda.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 12:31 PM
Feb 2014

I despise it.

Cerridwen

(13,257 posts)
21. "Saying 'I'm not happy at all,' Broncos' John Moffitt quits NFL" (edited with ap title)
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 10:34 AM
Feb 2014

I decided to edit this and include the title of the ap article the dailycaller quoted out of context and used to reduce the message to a slam at the left.

A Denver Broncos lineman is quitting the NFL — and walking away from an additional $1 million he would have made if he’d stayed through the end of his contract next year — because he’d begun reading the works of liberal linguist Noam Chomsky and the Dalai Lama.

Guard John Moffitt called the Broncos from his home in Seattle last week and said he wouldn’t be back.

<snip>

“I just really thought about it and decided I’m not happy,” he told AP. “I’m not happy at all. And I think it’s really madness to risk your body, risk your well-being and risk your happiness for money.”

<snip>

“I don’t care about the Super Bowl,” he told AP. “I don’t need the Super Bowl experience. I played in great stadiums and I played against great players. And I had that experience and it’s enough.”


The article is about a player leaving the game, walking away from an additional $1 million.

He cited his reading of Chomsky and the Dalai Lama as having had influence on his decision.

The dailycaller focuses on Chomsky to attack the left. Nice. /sarcasm

The dailycaller also took the ap article which they used, out of context and zeroed in on a little sidebar paragraph completely avoiding the topic of a man who chose to leave rather than continue to put himself at risk.

ENGLEWOOD, Colo. (AP) — John Moffitt wasn't unhappy with a lack of playing time in Denver. He quit the NFL because he'd lost his love for the game and was tired of risking his health.

<snip>

Then he announced on Twitter that he was calling it a career, saying, "Football was fun but my head hurts-haha kidding roger goodell. I'm on to new things, thanks to everyone along the way!!!"

<snip>

"I'm not trying to be the poster boy for 'Oh, I thought I should leave because of concussions.' I'm just saying, it's a valid point," Moffitt said. "I love the game and I respect the game and everybody who plays it knows what they risk and I knew what I risked when I played, and I'm no longer willing to risk it."

{here's the paragraph the dailycaller, and subsequently you, focused on rather than the larger story}

Moffitt majored in sociology at Wisconsin and said his world view was really shaped over the last couple of years when he began studying the writings of the Dalai Lama and Noam Chomsky.

<snip>


Quite a different story than the one the dailycaller spun. Quite a different story and message than quoted in your OP.

I'm pretty sure the story from the ap might have been controversial enough to get quite a bit of feedback and debate. Of course, it wasn't a broadside against the left as it was in the dailycaller spin.




 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
23. No more so than movies or video games
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 10:44 AM
Feb 2014

Sports is entertainment. The ancient Romans didn't have such a huge variety of entertainment options. The NFL competes for that slice of the pie, it's not bread and circuses.

I don't think the political landscape would change without professional sports.

Chorophyll

(5,179 posts)
25. Sometimes people just want to watch a football game.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 10:53 AM
Feb 2014

It's not my thing, but I have lots of other frivolous pastimes. For example, I'm a feminist. But I'm also a comedy fan. You can imagine the problematic conundrums I face every day.

We're not saints; we're human beings. That's why the labor movement gave us weekends.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
27. There are those of us who can watch sports and still care about issues. Human beings need
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 10:53 AM
Feb 2014

distraction and fun. If all we did was pay attention to how crappy the world was, we would all be suicidal.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
34. Rec for Chomsky, the Dalai Lama and a Professional Football player who gets
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 11:35 AM
Feb 2014

what they were talking about.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
38. Dang. I thought Noam was going to critique the Seahawks' adjustment to depart from
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 11:54 AM
Feb 2014

their normal single high safety defense.

He is right, of course, that our politicians well understand that if they keep the guns, beer and football games flowing, they can do just about anything else they want to do and the general public will not ask any questions.

But really, today is not the time, buddy.

Cerridwen

(13,257 posts)
44. Chomsky in context as presented in Manufacturing Consent (1992 interviews)
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 12:18 PM
Feb 2014
<snip>

QUESTION: When we talk about manufacturing of consent, whose consent is being manufactured?

CHOMSKY: To start with, there are two different groups, we can get into more detail, but at the first level of approximation, there's two targets for propaganda.

<big snip>

Now there are other media too whose basic social role is quite different: it's diversion. There's the real mass media-the kinds that are aimed at, you know, Joe Six Pack -- that kind. The purpose of those media is just to dull people's brains.

This is an oversimplification, but for the eighty percent or whatever they are, the main thing is to divert them. To get them to watch National Football League. And to worry about "Mother With Child With Six Heads," or whatever you pick up on the supermarket stands and so on. Or look at astrology. Or get involved in fundamentalist stuff or something or other. Just get them away. Get them away from things that matter. And for that it's important to reduce their capacity to think.

Take, say, sports -- that's another crucial example of the indoctrination system, in my view. For one thing because it -- you know, it offers people something to pay attention to that's of no importance. (audience laughs) That keeps them from worrying about -- (applause) keeps them from worrying about things that matter to their lives that they might have some idea of doing something about. And in fact it's striking to see the intelligence that's used by ordinary people in (discussions of) sports (as opposed to political and social issues]. I mean, you listen to radio stations where people call in -- they have the most exotic information (more laughter) and understanding about all kind of arcane issues. And the press undoubtedly does a lot with this.

You know, I remember in high school, already I was pretty old. I suddenly asked myself at one point, why do I care if my high school team wins the football game? (laughter) I mean, I don't know anybody on the team, you know? (audience roars) I mean, they have nothing to do with me, I mean, why I am cheering for my team? It doesn't mean any -- it doesn't make sense. But the point is, it does make sense: it's a way of building up irrational attitudes of submission to authority, and group cohesion behind leadership elements -- in fact, it's training in irrational jingoism. That's also a feature of competitive sports. I think if you look closely at these things, I think, typically, they do have functions, and that's why energy is devoted to supporting them and creating a basis for them and advertisers are willing to pay for them and so on.

(square brackets used in original replaced by parenthesis to keep from breaking formatting)


A nice anonymous blogger out there had this snippet of more of Chomsky discussing sports (from Understanding Power, p. 99-100)

In fact, I have the habit when I'm driving of turning on these radio call-in programs, and it's striking when you hear the ones about sports. They have these groups of sports reporters, or some kind of experts on a panel, and people call in and have discussions with them. First of all, the audience obviously is devoting an enormous amount of time to it all. But the more striking fact is, the callers have a tremendous amount of expertise, they have detailed knowledge of all kinds of things, they carry on these extremely complex discussions...

...And when you look at the structure of them, they seem like a kind of mathematics. It's as though people want to work out mathematical problems, and it they don't have calculus and arithmetic, they work them out with other structures...And what all these things look like is that people just want to use their intelligence somehow...

Well, in our society we have things that you might use your intelligence on, like politics, but people really can't get involved in them in a very serious way -- so what they do is put their minds to other things, such as sports. You're trained to be obedient; you don't have an interesting job; there's no work around for you that's creative; in the cultural environment you're a passive observer of usually pretty tawdry stuff...So what's left?

...And I suppose that's also one of the basic functions it serves society in general: it occupies the populations, and it keeps them from trying to get involved with things that really matter. In fact, I presume that's part of the reason why spectator sports are supported to the degree they are by the dominant institutions.

Noam Chomsky; Understanding Power, p. 99-100

(emphasis added)


If anyone has the book and can provide the full paragraphs for better context, it would be great if you could include them.

Response to ellenrr (Original post)

cilla4progress

(24,726 posts)
52. I agree, yet, notwithstanding Mr. Chomsky..
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 12:50 PM
Feb 2014

how about them 'Hawks! So proud of them here in the Pacific NW!!

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
57. If my head's filled with NFL, it's not filled with income inequality...
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 07:03 PM
Feb 2014

...wars without end for profit and power...Welfare for Wall Street...Fukushima spewing who-knows-what into the environment...

Go Lions!

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
58. Some of us can walk and chew gum at the same time
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 07:03 PM
Feb 2014

Movies, music, sports, the arts can all be part of our lives as well as politics, the class system, finance, etc. etc.

The problem with guys like Chomsky is they have such a dim view of the intelligence of the average human, especially Americans, they really want to lower and set the bar themselves and focus on only "the important things" while the rest of us would like to challenge ourselves a bit more than that. Sorry, Noam.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chomsky on superbowl