Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Archae

(46,317 posts)
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 01:50 PM Feb 2014

Pat Robertson tries, and fails, to "justify" Biblical tribal warfare and genocide.

That is what it was.
Tribal warfare and slaughter, combined with "They don't worship *OUR* God!"

Pat Robertson Explains Divine Genocide

Submitted by Brian Tashman on Monday, 2/3/2014 12:40 pm

Genocide is okay if its purpose is to stop man-animal sex, Pat Robertson explained today on the 700 Club. When a viewer asked the televangelist about Old Testament accounts “where God told his people to wipe out cities and take their lands,” noting that it “sounds like Islam to me,” Robertson responded that God was actually showing mercy on the annihilated peoples because otherwise they would pass their sinful ways onto their children and grandchildren.

"Assuming you have a culture that has 1,000 really bad people in it — they’re murderers, they’re thieves, they’re rapists, they’re having incest, you name it they are doing everything horrible — now if they have children, what’s going to happen? Instead of having 1,000, you’ll have 3,000 or 4,000; then — nothing has changed them — then they’ll pass it on to the next generation and the next thing you know you’ve got 10,000 or 20,000 of them and if it keeps on going you’re going to have a million of them. So what’s the most merciful thing for a loving God to do? It’s to take the thousand and get rid of them. And that’s what He did."

- See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/pat-robertson-explains-divine-genocide#sthash.F873ndns.dpuf

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Cerridwen

(13,254 posts)
2. pat robertson's contribution to the political climate based
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 01:54 PM
Feb 2014

on his use of "religion" as a tool to justify hatred is I think very appropriate for a discussion about politics in general and the tools used to manipulate the value systems that advise our politics.


el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
3. It's strictly a religious argument he is making though
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 01:57 PM
Feb 2014

I think that when the Pope for example makes statements about the economy than it belongs in GD - but if you want to say "Hey the popes a nice guy" or the pope talks about forgiveness or strictly religious matters it belongs elsewhere. Same here.

Bryant

Cerridwen

(13,254 posts)
5. his "religious" clap-trap is part of his influence as is the reach
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 02:03 PM
Feb 2014

he has due to his use of technology; i.e., "the 700 club."

It shows the use of various tools used to influence people; "religion," technology, "the 'God'-seal of approval" dismissal of facts that are in opposition to science or reality, purposeful obfuscation of scholarship, and so on.

There are myriad tools used to keep populations acquiescent and ignorant. robertson's BS includes a few of them.



Archae

(46,317 posts)
7. Robertson's views are a big part of the right-wing mindset.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 02:12 PM
Feb 2014

And those views on genocide, ("Kill 'em all, let God sort 'em out,&quot have made it into much of our foreign polices, especially when Bush and Cheney were in charge.

Just look at how right-wing pundits and advocates are pushing to have Islam outlawed, even to the level of Ann "Kill all their leaders and convert them to Christianity" Coulter.

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
4. I guess he's giving rabid right wingers excuses for all their behaior. You know, like not supporting
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 02:00 PM
Feb 2014

food stamps. If poor people don't die from starvation they might have kids and they too will be poor people, and we'll have a lot more of them.
Make you wonder how he would tie this to abortion.

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
6. If God got rid of all the bad people, why is Robertson always blaming someone for
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 02:08 PM
Feb 2014

one thing or another and wanting God to smite them or blaming certain people for natural disasters and claiming God was mad at them.. Either God is not very Omnipotent or else just loves having bad folks around, because he sure didn't get rid of all the bad people as Robertson suggested he did.

anneboleyn

(5,611 posts)
10. One of the most stupid, offensive, and evil things he has said. And that is saying something.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 02:40 PM
Feb 2014

These comments are just disgusting. Frankly it is amazing that he is still on the air. He should have been removed years ago. So there was no hope of redemption for these Old Testament people massacred by God, Pat? Their children would automatically have been evil -- no chance for redemption at all? So Robertson is arguing that an entire" race" of people were created by God just to be annihilated when he (God) gave the order... Twisted and creepy indeed.

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
11. What this proves to me is that Robertson doesn't understand math, demographics or human nature.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 02:59 PM
Feb 2014

Or God.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pat Robertson tries, and ...