Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Unknown Beatle

(2,672 posts)
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 04:48 PM Feb 2014

Philip Seymour Hoffman Didn't Have to Die

-Snip-

Details are still emerging, but it appears that the heroin found in Hoffman's apartment belongs to nasty strain of laced heroin known by such names as "Ace of Spades" and "Theraflu."

Hoffman was only 46-years-old, a master of his craft, and a father of three young children. It is truly a tragedy that someone with that much talent and that much to live for died so young.

But perhaps the most tragic thing of all is that Hoffman's death could very easily have been prevented.

It could have been prevented if we in the United States started to do what countries like the United Kingdom and Switzerland have been doing for years: prescribing heroin to heroin addicts.

This sounds counterintuitive, but it actually makes perfect sense once you understand how heroin works.

More: Truth-Out

80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Philip Seymour Hoffman Didn't Have to Die (Original Post) Unknown Beatle Feb 2014 OP
I need a better link than that. Whisp Feb 2014 #1
Links in the article... M0rpheus Feb 2014 #5
Harm reduction policies aren't popular in the U.S. RainDog Feb 2014 #2
True - and we are more backward than ever... polichick Feb 2014 #6
Word. Barack_America Feb 2014 #15
A brilliant and succinct analysis. volstork Feb 2014 #25
so true. nt La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2014 #29
Bingo! +100000! RufusTFirefly Feb 2014 #30
religious sadism RainDog Feb 2014 #34
Atually, the Judeo-Christian God is a big improvement over the Greek and Roman gods and JDPriestly Feb 2014 #43
LOL RainDog Feb 2014 #44
Well said, RainDog! Rainngirl Feb 2014 #55
what Raindog said.... mike_c Feb 2014 #58
Amen! The approach in Europe has been quite successful. Here we smear, judge, and condemn anneboleyn Feb 2014 #70
He would have died eventually... HipChick Feb 2014 #3
Yes, everyone dies eventually, byt HERVEPA Feb 2014 #7
meanwhile, Keith Richards rocks on Baclava Feb 2014 #54
Yup! HERVEPA Feb 2014 #59
And, Like Hoffman, He Can Afford the Best Upward Feb 2014 #68
No shit, sherlock, everyone does, but probably not at 46 years of age. whathehell Feb 2014 #8
That sorta goes without saying for everyone. Liberal Veteran Feb 2014 #9
Either way, you don't see 70-year-old herion addicts. Laffy Kat Feb 2014 #12
You never met William Burroughs. n/t Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #14
Not to mention rickyhall Feb 2014 #32
Yes, once an addict always an addict. Laffy Kat Feb 2014 #41
Or, if legally available dbackjon Feb 2014 #33
Wisdom from Grandmaster Dubya... Fumesucker Feb 2014 #19
Dubya? I thought that was Keynes. MH1 Feb 2014 #64
It's compassion like this Aerows Feb 2014 #38
Perhaps, perhaps not LiberalEsto Feb 2014 #4
False equivalence eggplant Feb 2014 #35
Theraflu has been in the news in Pittsburgh spinbaby Feb 2014 #10
No, he didn't HAVE to die. He CHOSE to die. Common Sense Party Feb 2014 #11
TOTALLY AGREE beachbum bob Feb 2014 #16
And wasn't he shooting up the night before he was supposed to go pick up his kids? Common Sense Party Feb 2014 #24
Are you saying Hoffman committed suicide? That his death was intentional? Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #17
He was shooting up heroin. He had to know that was a very likely possibility. Common Sense Party Feb 2014 #20
arguing with people who fail to understand addiction Skittles Feb 2014 #56
Arguing With People Who Can't Acknowledge the Damage Addicts Do Upward Feb 2014 #69
ridiculous Skittles Feb 2014 #73
Do you say that about anyone who dies doing something risky? Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #18
They all know the risks. And they choose to do it anyway. Common Sense Party Feb 2014 #22
The motorcycle rider who gets hit by an SUV? Did he choose to die? Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #26
If he chose to ride without a helmet, he made a poor choice. Common Sense Party Feb 2014 #27
Your attitude toward heroin addiction seems to be anything but "common sense." Maedhros Feb 2014 #53
The ol' ad hominem Reagan attack. Common Sense Party Feb 2014 #74
There are two ways to approach drug addiction: Maedhros Feb 2014 #76
Thank you for the helpful breakdown. SalviaBlue Feb 2014 #79
Motorcycles are dangerous. No airbags, etc. Shit happens. They accept the risk. n-t Logical Feb 2014 #47
The rider accepts the risk... Yes. But that does not mean that they choose to die. Glassunion Feb 2014 #77
This post reinforces everything Raindog said. anneboleyn Feb 2014 #71
True! He could have stopped using heroin and he would have lived. cbdo2007 Feb 2014 #13
Oh yeah, it's that simple. mimi85 Feb 2014 #21
Yep, I work with people with chemical dependencies every day. cbdo2007 Feb 2014 #23
If you work with chemically dependent people every day, then you know how... SaveOurDemocracy Feb 2014 #36
PSH had ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD and kept doing drugs. What possible "system" could.... Logical Feb 2014 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author SaveOurDemocracy Feb 2014 #60
Pot should be 100% legal. Small if any risks..... Logical Feb 2014 #63
Is not having money the only reason someone would do drugs? Dustlawyer Feb 2014 #61
I dont want to lock up any drug users..... Logical Feb 2014 #62
Yes, it is that simple. idendoit Feb 2014 #51
What's funny is that in the US they'll prescribe methadone to help heroin addicts kick justiceischeap Feb 2014 #28
Which why there's now buprenorphine (brand name Suboxone). Actually possible to get off of. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #39
They found buprenorphine in his apartment Abq_Sarah Feb 2014 #75
For those who want to quit, though, bupe can be a miracle drug. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #80
Yes yes yes!! bravenak Feb 2014 #31
It's hard to look at those kids and be not angry at his selfishness, addiction or no. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #37
Agreed on both counts. This is an incredibly senseless death, for many reasons. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #40
It's difficult to understand. Mr.Bill Feb 2014 #42
He choose to do a high risk activity. Like sky diving or street racing. He wanted the thrill.... Logical Feb 2014 #45
Where did you read that mimi85 Feb 2014 #66
It will be interesting to find out if this is indeed the case. Blue_In_AK Feb 2014 #46
if youre gonna party like that reddread Feb 2014 #49
We may or may not inherit a tendency toward addiction per Wikipedia. JDPriestly Feb 2014 #50
We all die tavernier Feb 2014 #52
I think this is a bit of hyperbole wercal Feb 2014 #57
Many years ago, I knew a guy who was on prescription methadone for his heroin addiction. Jenoch Feb 2014 #65
Yay! Exploitative Journalism! Wheee! Upward Feb 2014 #67
Well said! nt mimi85 Feb 2014 #72
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2014 #78
 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
1. I need a better link than that.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 04:50 PM
Feb 2014

Very interesting and thanks for bringing it up. I'll go looking around.

http://www.extratv.com/2014/02/03/did-philip-seymour-hoffman-die-from-deadly-heroin-strain/

Eight of the empty bags were stamped with “Ace of Spades” and “Ace of Hearts,” which reportedly could be street names for a deadly mix of heroin laced with the opiate fentanyl. The drug has also been known as "Theraflu," "Bud Ice" and "24K,” and has been linked to more than 100 deaths in America.

Cops are not sure if this strain caused Hoffman's death, but they told TMZ that "everything's in play" until they get results from toxicology.

M0rpheus

(885 posts)
5. Links in the article...
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 04:55 PM
Feb 2014
After the Swiss legalized prescription programs in the mid-1990s, they saw an immediate drop in both drug related deaths and deaths due AIDS among drug addicts.
More recent studies have reached the same conclusion.
A paper published by the New England Journal of Medicine in 2009 looked at a set of experimental prescription programs in Canada and found that they "led to a significant reduction of crime and overdose deaths."

Similar new research put out in 2012 by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction found that the benefits of prescription heroin include,
"...a major reduction in the extent of continued injecting of 'street' heroin, improvements in general health, psychological well-being and social functioning, as well as major disengagement from criminal activities (such as acquisitive crime to fund continued use of 'street' heroin and other street drugs)."

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
2. Harm reduction policies aren't popular in the U.S.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 04:51 PM
Feb 2014

This nation revels in creating classes of people to demonize and punish.

We are not a forward-thinking nation. We are infested with puritanical hate-mongers who think it is their duty to make sure those with problems suffer for them.

And they vote for the same sort of politician.

polichick

(37,152 posts)
6. True - and we are more backward than ever...
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 04:57 PM
Feb 2014

The powers that be saw the backlash to the 60s as the perfect opportunity to use fear to their advantage.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
30. Bingo! +100000!
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:27 PM
Feb 2014

What a strange country we live in where people who suffer are demonized while those who cause suffering are lionized.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
34. religious sadism
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:37 PM
Feb 2014

of course, if your religion teaches you that the almighty expected someone to kill his only son as a sign of trust or, really, blind obedience, what would you expect?

and then that same god decided it was good to impregnate a female to provide a human sacrifice for everyone, not just one tribe.

Suffering is part of the pleasure of that sort of love.

kinda icky, but there you are.

Of course, other religions recognize that suffering is part of the human condition because of our attachment to others and to ephemeral things like status. Rather than demand a human sacrifice, they ask us to recognize this suffering exists in everyone and the proper response to suffering is compassion.

The judeo-xtian god was out of the room when the compassion part of being a deity was discussed in god class, I guess.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
44. LOL
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 07:21 PM
Feb 2014

maybe in some aspects. the ritual slaughter of the divine feminine, however, is not one of them.

I choose not to reify any such myths.

Rainngirl

(243 posts)
55. Well said, RainDog!
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 07:44 PM
Feb 2014

"We are infested with puritanical hate-mongers who think it is their duty to make sure those with problems suffer for them."

I am forever trying to say this to people, but you worded it perfectly. It's the puritans (and greedy 1 percenters) who are at the bottom of everything evil in this country.

anneboleyn

(5,611 posts)
70. Amen! The approach in Europe has been quite successful. Here we smear, judge, and condemn
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 11:51 PM
Feb 2014

so that even a brilliant, gifted man like Hoffman, a father of three young children and an Oscar winner, an actor who by all accounts was incredibly generous and dedicated, who clearly had a terrible problem (reports have been saying now that he had at least fifty bags of this stuff!), is rubbed into the dirt by the judgmental Puritans who have no empathy and no desire to help other human beings. Forget empathy for ordinary addicts who are not famous actors -- they are ruthlessly condemning an Oscar winner who appeared in a dozen films and was adored by many fans and film critics. No empathy. Not a shred of it.

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
7. Yes, everyone dies eventually, byt
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 05:00 PM
Feb 2014

You don't have to die from heroin. You die from bad heroin ar unknown strength.

Upward

(115 posts)
68. And, Like Hoffman, He Can Afford the Best
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 11:39 PM
Feb 2014

PSH made a choice. An unfortunate one.

Anyone who thinks this drive isn't about business needs to read up on the Opium Wars.

Liberal Veteran

(22,239 posts)
9. That sorta goes without saying for everyone.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 05:00 PM
Feb 2014


But the question is whether he would have died of a heroin overdose yesterday or gotten help sometime later or possibly been a functioning heroin addict for another thirty years.

Laffy Kat

(16,377 posts)
12. Either way, you don't see 70-year-old herion addicts.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 05:58 PM
Feb 2014

But I agree that it should be safely prescribed. What an enormous loss.

rickyhall

(4,889 posts)
32. Not to mention
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:29 PM
Feb 2014

Pete and Keith, who are clean but still living. And, contrary to that rehab commercial, even when you are clean you're still an addict. Right?

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
33. Or, if legally available
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:33 PM
Feb 2014

Had not seen the need to be clean for 23 years, and not produced the body of work he did.

MH1

(17,595 posts)
64. Dubya? I thought that was Keynes.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 09:00 PM
Feb 2014

(or did I miss a funny?)

Keynes' point (or whoever's) being that economic progress over "the long run" doesn't generally help any of us as individuals, because in the long run we're all dead. In other words, don't sacrifice people to policies aimed at the "long run" that they'll never get to see.

That's what I got out of it, anyway. A rather valuable point that I would hate to see attributed to the guy I normally call Dubya. And I can't imagine him quoting Keynes but who knows.

 

LiberalEsto

(22,845 posts)
4. Perhaps, perhaps not
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 04:54 PM
Feb 2014

How many times have we read about perfectly legal, theoretically regulated products like cantaloupes, lettuce, beef, cheese, etc. causing mass poisonings and/or deaths?

eggplant

(3,911 posts)
35. False equivalence
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:38 PM
Feb 2014

Food and manufactured medicine don't fall under the same inspection rules, nor the same liability.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
24. And wasn't he shooting up the night before he was supposed to go pick up his kids?
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:12 PM
Feb 2014

I don't know how long a heroin high lasts, but that was a choice he made.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
17. Are you saying Hoffman committed suicide? That his death was intentional?
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:02 PM
Feb 2014

If not, he didn't choose to die. He may have died because the illegality of heroin makes it difficult to have good quality control.

Skittles

(153,147 posts)
73. ridiculous
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 01:33 AM
Feb 2014

who said I do not understand the damage done? My own brother drank himself to death and MY MOTHER FOUND HIM. Think I really don't know the damage done? Now, off you go.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
22. They all know the risks. And they choose to do it anyway.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:08 PM
Feb 2014

He was doing something both risky AND illegal.

And he knew that other entertainers had died by overdosing on the same crap.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
26. The motorcycle rider who gets hit by an SUV? Did he choose to die?
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:16 PM
Feb 2014

He was doing something risky (albeit not illegal).

The whole "he made a bad choice" meme seems callous and Republican to me.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
27. If he chose to ride without a helmet, he made a poor choice.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:20 PM
Feb 2014

In your analogy, Hoffman was riding the motorcycle, without a helmet, and he was ALSO driving the SUV at himself.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
53. Your attitude toward heroin addiction seems to be anything but "common sense."
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 07:36 PM
Feb 2014

You are taking the view of (among others) Reagan Drug Czar William Bennett that drug addiction is not a health condition but is instead a moral failing, and therefore drug addicts are not worthy of treatment or even compassion.

Needless to say, like everything else about the Reagan Presidency this had a deleterious effect on the nation.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
76. There are two ways to approach drug addiction:
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 04:14 PM
Feb 2014

1. Treat it as a health issue and try to help the addict recover

or

2. Treat it as a moral failing and blame the victim.


I choose #1, because it has been shown to be much more effective than #2.

(And it's not an ad hominem attack to point out that your position is the same as William Bennett's. It would be an ad hominem attack if I said your argument was invalid because you are a clueless conservative troll).

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
77. The rider accepts the risk... Yes. But that does not mean that they choose to die.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 04:31 PM
Feb 2014

In fact everyone who travels by automobile accepts risk. It is one of the leading causes of death in the US.

cbdo2007

(9,213 posts)
23. Yep, I work with people with chemical dependencies every day.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:09 PM
Feb 2014

I didn't say it was simple, but it is a choice.

SaveOurDemocracy

(4,400 posts)
36. If you work with chemically dependent people every day, then you know how...
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:50 PM
Feb 2014

...pathetically inadequate our current system is.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
48. PSH had ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD and kept doing drugs. What possible "system" could....
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 07:29 PM
Feb 2014

of helped him?

Response to Logical (Reply #48)

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
63. Pot should be 100% legal. Small if any risks.....
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 08:49 PM
Feb 2014

I am sorry about your son. I cannot imagine how hard that is.

We need to stop putting people in jail for drug use. Dealing is another issue for me.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
61. Is not having money the only reason someone would do drugs?
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 08:09 PM
Feb 2014

I see a lot of argument here about whether or not he deserved it, "chose it," whatever. Look, the man was human. Whether or not you are a celebrity, rich, or both, you still have to face life which can be stressful, sad, frustrating..., no matter who you are. A certain percentage of the population, across all income/wealth measures, will become addicted to something. A celebrity has that stuff thrown at them if they want.
If blame has to be directed somewhere, just understand this, after you have blamed who you want to blame, what should we do about it? Nothing but what we are doing, or should we lock up even more people? Or, should we try treating addiction and drastically modifying our penal code as it relates to drug offenses? What's the old saying, "If you do what you have always done, you get what you always got."

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
62. I dont want to lock up any drug users.....
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 08:47 PM
Feb 2014

But some drugs are damn dangerous. And I think some need to be illegal.

Pot cannot kill you. So no laws needed.

Some drugs can. So regulation is needed.

 

idendoit

(505 posts)
51. Yes, it is that simple.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 07:34 PM
Feb 2014

Now if anyone says that it is easy, they aren't being honest. Simple is not always easy.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
28. What's funny is that in the US they'll prescribe methadone to help heroin addicts kick
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:21 PM
Feb 2014

but methadone is actually more addictive than heroin. Go figure.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
80. For those who want to quit, though, bupe can be a miracle drug.
Wed Feb 5, 2014, 09:52 PM
Feb 2014

Key word being can, I suppose. No guarantees.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
37. It's hard to look at those kids and be not angry at his selfishness, addiction or no.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:52 PM
Feb 2014

That said, I support Harm Reduction policies, wholeheartedly.

Mr.Bill

(24,278 posts)
42. It's difficult to understand.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 07:07 PM
Feb 2014

I've been a drug user and could have been killed countless times by even a small amount of poorly manufactured drugs. I knew I was taking a risk, but I never intended to die. Robert Downey Jr. put it well, I think, when he said to a judge at one of his court hearings "It's like I have a gun in my mouth with my finger on the trigger and I like the taste of the gun metal."

I was a more casual user, but If I had the money and connections some of these celebrities have, there's no telling what may have happened. I know I always casually said if I won the lottery I would be dead in a matter of months. I still don't buy lottery tickets.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
45. He choose to do a high risk activity. Like sky diving or street racing. He wanted the thrill....
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 07:25 PM
Feb 2014

and accepted the risk.


mimi85

(1,805 posts)
66. Where did you read that
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 11:00 PM
Feb 2014

he wanted the thrill? I'd like to see that. Usually opiate users are tryin to numb feelings...it's not like a coke high or skydiving.

The only thing I do know is that I will
miss his acting. What a great talent! Hope his family is hanging in there. So sad.


Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
46. It will be interesting to find out if this is indeed the case.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 07:27 PM
Feb 2014

The Fentanyl-laced heroin was the first thing I thought of.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
49. if youre gonna party like that
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 07:31 PM
Feb 2014

do it with John Travolta and Eric Stoltz nearby.
Rosanna Arquette optional.
Hate to disagree with Bill Hicks, but
I have sympathy for gas station attendants who get killed.
Not this fellow.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
50. We may or may not inherit a tendency toward addiction per Wikipedia.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 07:34 PM
Feb 2014

Here is a rating of the addictiveness of various substances:

Addictive potential

The addictive potential of a drug varies from substance to substance, and from individual to individual. Dose, frequency, pharmacokinetics of a particular substance, route of administration, and time are critical factors for developing a drug addiction.

An article in The Lancet compared the harm and addiction of 20 drugs, using a scale from 0 to 3 for physical addiction, psychological addiction, and pleasure to create a mean score for addiction. Selected results can be seen in the chart below.[9]

(The columns in the chart did not align correctly so you have to go to this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substance_dependence

Alcohol and tobacco very often harm the body. When I reached my 50s, I noticed that the heavy smokers among my friends were dying first. They are harmful drugs also and more commonly used.

Note that tobacco not only harms the body but is rated as highly for physical addiction as barbiturates and benzodiazapines on this list.

But tobacco and alcohol are legal.

Tobacco is rated as more addictive than cocaine. But heroin is the worst.

Maybe this is not news to a lot of DUers, but I think it is worth remembering. What drugs are and are not legal has little to do with the danger of the drugs and more to do with social tolerance of the use of the drug. But clearly, again, heroin is the most physically addictive.

tavernier

(12,376 posts)
52. We all die
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 07:36 PM
Feb 2014

and many of us don't have the luxury of moving the odds in our favor: kids with cancer, the family hit by a drunk driver...
But there are ways that most people choose to avoid an earlier exit. He knew the risks.

wercal

(1,370 posts)
57. I think this is a bit of hyperbole
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 07:53 PM
Feb 2014

Even in nations that prescribe heroin to addicts, it is reserved for the incredibly addicted, who have exhausted other means of treatment.

Hoffman went to rehab for 10 days last year. That's all we know. And that sounds incredibly short, and suggests that he wasn't yet fully committed to rehab.

Until I hear that he tried methadone and suboxone, and they proved ineffective, I consider it a leap to suggest that current drug policy killed him.

Upward

(115 posts)
67. Yay! Exploitative Journalism! Wheee!
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 11:36 PM
Feb 2014

One of the best actors of our time died a tragic death. Can't we at least bury him before people try to use the corpse for their own business agenda?

Response to Unknown Beatle (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Philip Seymour Hoffman Di...