Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
2. Sadly, probably not anything
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 10:21 PM
Feb 2014

Though governors could probably write orders to reduce or end sentences, the standard is that the law was broken when it was a law, and future legality doesn't reflect on that.

I could be wrong - the only cases I can think of to draw precedence from would be prohibition-era sentences, and i admit to being no expert there.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
4. Well, you could write automatic mass pardons and clemencies into the law.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 10:26 PM
Feb 2014

That's a harder sell than just legalizing it, though.

An Alaska initiative a decade or more ago sought reparations for people convicted of pot crimes. It lost. That language isn't in this year's initiative.

tavernier

(12,376 posts)
5. I have a neighbor who compared it
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 10:27 PM
Feb 2014

with the old "eating fish on Friday." He said that since every one who ate fish on Fridays used to go to hell, what happened with the ppl in hell once the rule was changed? Did they get out?

😄 Hey, I have no clue, but both are interesting questions!

Warpy

(111,243 posts)
6. It was the people who ate meat on Friday who were condemned
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 11:35 PM
Feb 2014

How fish got classified as a plant is beyond me, but it was allowed.

A close reading of the bible, cover to cover, will show you a god who would prefer to send people to hell than admit them to heaven. So the rule got changed, all the people who were bucking for sainthood who got pastry made with lard on Friday without knowing it as their only sin are toasting with the rest of the reprobates.

Anyone who broke a stupid and unfair law before it was declared stupid and unfair and abolished apparently deserves both hell and prison.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
8. Probably nothing...they were imprisoned because "they broke the law"
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 09:35 AM
Feb 2014

would likely be the cry of lobbyists for the for-profit prison industry.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So if every state legaliz...