Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBarbie's Lead Designer Defends Barbie's Crazy Proportions
http://www.fastcodesign.com/3025620/barbies-lead-designer-defends-barbies-crazy-proportionsBARBIE'S UNREALISTIC PROPORTIONS ARE A STANDARD TALKING POINT AROUND BODY IMAGE. FOR THE FIRST TIME, BARBIE'S LEAD DESIGNER FIRES BACK.
During a recent visit to Mattels design headquarters in Los Angeles, I was invited into the Barbie design studio. At first glance, its a sea of cubicles like any other. Then you notice the hundreds of dismembered Barbie heads peeking up over the dividers, and, of course, the pink. Pantone 219 crops up everywhere it can. Like a resilient weed growing straight from the corporate carpeting, pink sprouts in X-Acto knives, Post-it notes, and clutch purses. A bit of Barbies influence permeates everything. (One young designer even confessed to me that before the job she never really wore pink, but now she felt the need to accessorize with Barbie.)
But while the omnipresent pink propaganda is infectious, Barbies designers were anything but the Stepfordian dictatorship seeking to deliberately crush a young girls body image as critics may assume. Like all of the designers I met at Mattel, they were nice, enthusiastic people who wanted to make kids happy and worked hard to do so--which made it particularly difficult to pull aside Kim Culmone, vice president of design for Barbie, after her tour and ask the dark question looming inside so many of us:
Co.Design: What's your stance on Barbie's proportions?
Culmone: Barbies body was never designed to be realistic. She was designed for girls to easily dress and undress. And shes had many bodies over the years, ones that are poseable, ones that are cut for princess cuts, ones that are more realistic.
During a recent visit to Mattels design headquarters in Los Angeles, I was invited into the Barbie design studio. At first glance, its a sea of cubicles like any other. Then you notice the hundreds of dismembered Barbie heads peeking up over the dividers, and, of course, the pink. Pantone 219 crops up everywhere it can. Like a resilient weed growing straight from the corporate carpeting, pink sprouts in X-Acto knives, Post-it notes, and clutch purses. A bit of Barbies influence permeates everything. (One young designer even confessed to me that before the job she never really wore pink, but now she felt the need to accessorize with Barbie.)
But while the omnipresent pink propaganda is infectious, Barbies designers were anything but the Stepfordian dictatorship seeking to deliberately crush a young girls body image as critics may assume. Like all of the designers I met at Mattel, they were nice, enthusiastic people who wanted to make kids happy and worked hard to do so--which made it particularly difficult to pull aside Kim Culmone, vice president of design for Barbie, after her tour and ask the dark question looming inside so many of us:
Co.Design: What's your stance on Barbie's proportions?
Culmone: Barbies body was never designed to be realistic. She was designed for girls to easily dress and undress. And shes had many bodies over the years, ones that are poseable, ones that are cut for princess cuts, ones that are more realistic.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1013 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Barbie's Lead Designer Defends Barbie's Crazy Proportions (Original Post)
steve2470
Feb 2014
OP
bull. I remember playing with barbies. They were never easy to dress and undress.
liberal_at_heart
Feb 2014
#1
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)1. bull. I remember playing with barbies. They were never easy to dress and undress.
The arms and legs were particularly hard to get clothes on and off of especially considering how tight the clothes fit the doll.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)2. I found Barbie easy to undress
But very disappointing once I had done so.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)3. rofl, truer words have never been spoken.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)4. I had a Skipper and a Barbie.
I never had trouble dressing or undressing them. My friends and I loved playing with our Barbies. My friend Rosa's mom was a seamstress and she used to give us scraps of fabric, trims, snaps and ribbons. We had a bunch of fun making clothes for the dolls. Good times.
Sparkly
(24,149 posts)5. Weren't Barbie's proportions designed for adult men?
Seriously. I think she was based on another doll for GIs in WWII -- Lillie?