General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans kill unemployment benefits for 1.7 million Americans. Twice.
by Laura Clawson
<...>
The Senate voted twice more on whether to restore emergency unemployment insurance for 1.7 million (and counting) Americans who've been jobless for six months or more Thursday afternoon, and Republicans blocked the aid twice more.
A cloture vote on an amendment giving Republicans much of what they'd claimed to require to support an unemployment bill fell just one vote short of the 60-vote supermajority required. (Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid subsequently changed his vote to no for procedural reasons, so the final vote was technically 58 to 40.) Republican Sens. Dean Heller of Nevada, Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire voted in favor of unemployment aid. Immediately after, Republicans again blocked the underlying bill without the set of concessions that hadn't been enough for them. In that vote, Heller was the only Republican voting yes.
The first vote was on an amendment in which Democrats gave Republicans much of what they said they wanted in exchange for extending unemployment insurance, but it wasn't enough:
At a certain pointa point we're well pastyou just have to conclude that, regardless of what they're demanding at any given point, Republicans simply don't want aid for people struggling with long-term unemployment in an economy with nearly three job seekers for every available job.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/06/1275587/-Republicans-kill-unemployment-benefits-for-1-7-million-Americans-Twice
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)factsarenotfair
(910 posts)Actually getting to watch the suffering of the long-term unemployed.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)how irrelevant the GOP is? I need something to cheer.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Good, then that's 1.7 million votes for Democrats, right?"
...if enough Dems voted against it, forcing Republicans to cast the deciding votes?
Back to reality...
trueslicky
(3 posts)Or something.
gopiscrap
(23,757 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)Simone Sanner
February 6, 2014
Dr. Steffie Woolhandler is co-author of the new study Opting Out Of Medicaid Expansion: the Health And Financial Impacts. The new study just released has found up to 17,000 people will die as a result of the refusal of red state governors to participate in expanded Medicaid programs.
There are 8 million people who will not receive coverage under the new law that are eligible for it. Of that 8 million, as many as 17,000 people will die having not gotten the medical care those in blue states have access to. Another 750,000 will suffer from untreated depression, diabetics will not have access to medication, and women will not have access to pap smears and mammograms.
Woolhandler attributes this to a political move on the part of red state governors, as the program is 100% completely funded by the federal government for the first three years. After those three years have passed, 90% of the costs will be funded by the federal government.
States making the investment in their people will see an approximate 50% reduction in the number of people without any health insurance whatsoever.
read more: http://aattp.org/17000-people-will-die-uninsured-in-red-states-because-gop-leaders-refused-medicaid-expansion/
napkinz
(17,199 posts)Liam O'Connor
February 7, 2014
Over 70,000 families across the US are set to lose their unemployment benefits this week following last nights cloture motion on an extension failed by one Republican vote.
1.7 million Americans were left without unemployment insurance after the program expired on December 28th of last year. Since then, senate Democrats have repeatedly sought an emergency extension of the program, only to see it beaten back every time because they have not been able to convince enough Republicans to join them.
Speaking after the vote, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada (D) spoke of the immense frustration felt by many Democrats after the Republicans once again refused to back the extension:
Im beginning to believe there is nothing that will get Republicans to yes. Its a no vote because they dont want to extend unemployment insurance. Were one Republican vote away from restoring benefits to 1.7 million Americans. There is one Republican vote standing in the way of a lifeline to these 1.7 million people. And every week [Republicans] delay, another 73,000 Americans lose these crucial benefits benefits that help them keep food on the table and a roof over their heads while they search for a job.
read more: http://aattp.org/over-70000-more-struggling-families-will-lose-lifeline-of-unemployment-this-week-due-to-obstructionist-gop/
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)They do not have Americans best interests at heart. They are not just good folks we have a few disagreements with that we just need to find "common ground" with. There is no 80% agreement with a few obstacles to overcome.
You
You could have woken me out of a dead sleep at ten years old (when the regressive were considerably less openly radical than they are now and the position of many was less dire) and I could have told you all of that, if you need a "come to Jesus" moment or some kind of epiphany to see something this infinitely obvious then I think the observation has been less than honest, possibly colored by by naive optimism and a deep desire to avoid conflict.
No shit they have no desire to help the unemployed because they'd like for there to be more, they loves them a glut of labor! It is like people have no understanding of what or who we contest nor do such folks grasp that we do not share even the broadest goals to the point of great danger from deeply flawed thinking, false assumptions, and strategies built on foundations of sand.
Stop the pretending and games and start talking and acting like the opposition is not what they are, it is foolhardy and cannot but cede them ground.