Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Renew Deal

(81,852 posts)
Mon Feb 10, 2014, 12:41 AM Feb 2014

Big carriers go political to kill local broadband

Major telcos are afraid that locally owned FTTH deployments will cut into their fat profits, so they seek to cripple competitors

When Time Warner and Embarq (now named CenturyLink) couldn't provide affordable, high-speed broadband, the residents of Wilson, a small town in North Carolina, decided to do it themselves. In 2006, Wilson built a municipally owned fiber-to-the home network that offers television, telephone, and broadband services at relatively low cost.

In response, Time Warner cut rates and boosted speeds a bit -- but that's not all. The cable giant, along with allies AT&T and CenturyLink, poured more than $1 million into the campaign coffers of North Carolina politicians, according to a report by Common Cause and the ILSR (Institute for Local Self Reliance). In 2011, the lobbying effort paid off: The state legislature passed a bill making it nearly impossible for other communities to build their own broadband networks.

North Carolina is hardly alone; 18 other states also have yielded to lobbying efforts by cable and telecom giants and passed similar legislation. The legislature of a 20th state, Kansas, is currently debating a law that would squelch local broadband projects there as well. And there's a bill pending in the Utah state legislature that would forbid a regional fiber consortium from expanding beyond the 16 cities it is currently authorized to serve with FTTH (fiber to the home) networks.
<snip>

The carriers' lobbying pays off
As reported by Ars Technica, Kansas is now considering a law restraining the development of municipal broadband that would be even more draconian than most of the ones already on the books in other states.
<snip>

http://www.infoworld.com/d/the-industry-standard/big-carriers-go-political-kill-local-broadband-235797

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Big carriers go political to kill local broadband (Original Post) Renew Deal Feb 2014 OP
Yeah, I got a second to Kick this! Cha Feb 2014 #1
KnR alittlelark Feb 2014 #2
The invisible hand of the free market is choking the fuck out of us. Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2014 #3
I thought I smelled ALEC Lasher Feb 2014 #4
K & R..nt Wounded Bear Feb 2014 #5
Why don't the Dems take advantage of this to pump up the base and even get new voters? kelliekat44 Feb 2014 #6
Democratic leadership has been usurped by the right. Scuba Feb 2014 #8
The Democratic Party is a rusty freighter, beached on a Pacific atoll. Eleanors38 Feb 2014 #9
+1 a whole bunch.......nt Enthusiast Feb 2014 #11
When we lived in the Nebraska Panhandle our internet was off cell towers newfie11 Feb 2014 #7
This is just plain wrong! Enthusiast Feb 2014 #10
The main thing that separates conservatives and liberals is basically this, afaict: reusrename Feb 2014 #12
Smells like ALEC BelgianMadCow Feb 2014 #13

Lasher

(27,554 posts)
4. I thought I smelled ALEC
Mon Feb 10, 2014, 01:30 AM
Feb 2014
A growing number of municipalities are answering “yes” by building their own networks and offering broadband services to their citizens. ALEC disagrees with their answer due to the negative impacts it has on free markets and limited government.

http://www.alec.org/task-forces/telecommunications-and-information-technology/municipal-broadband/

Their reach is surely more pervasive than we know, and we need to come up with a way to fight them.

If everything is always done more efficiently in the private sector as these economic neoliberals claim, then why are they so afraid of this competition by municipalities? What kind of "free markets" are promoted by laws that ensure Big Carriers will have monopolies?
 

kelliekat44

(7,759 posts)
6. Why don't the Dems take advantage of this to pump up the base and even get new voters?
Mon Feb 10, 2014, 02:36 AM
Feb 2014

Or are the Dems also so deeply controlled that they won't put up a decent fight. I put up a link to a really good discussion on this but I doubt that many here listened to the program. Still it was one of the best discussions about this issue. I'll repost link.


This is a MUST if you want to know how Net Neutrality/FCC and the impact of the latest ruling.


http://www.npr.org/programs/fresh-air/ (Feb 6)

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
9. The Democratic Party is a rusty freighter, beached on a Pacific atoll.
Mon Feb 10, 2014, 07:40 AM
Feb 2014

In other words, THERE IS NO OPPOSITION.

newfie11

(8,159 posts)
7. When we lived in the Nebraska Panhandle our internet was off cell towers
Mon Feb 10, 2014, 06:25 AM
Feb 2014

We had no landline phone ( just cells) and broadband was and still is a dream.
Vistabeam is the company and he has expanded into Wyoming.
We had great service.

 

reusrename

(1,716 posts)
12. The main thing that separates conservatives and liberals is basically this, afaict:
Mon Feb 10, 2014, 05:34 PM
Feb 2014

Conservatives believe that when the government takes over control of the corporations you end up with fascism.

Liberals believe that when the corporations take over control of the government you end up with fascism.

I think Mussolini had it right and fascism is when the two work together hand-in-hand. So am I a liberal or a conservative?

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)
13. Smells like ALEC
Mon Feb 10, 2014, 05:46 PM
Feb 2014

or some similar effort. There's gonna be resistance like this every step of the way - we better hunker down for a long fight.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Big carriers go political...