Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopbush

(24,392 posts)
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 01:59 PM Feb 2014

Marco Rubio Got One Thing Right About Answering The Q: Have You Smoked Pot

And that is: if you say "no," nobody believes you.

I can attest to that. I'm 59 years old, and I have never smoked pot. When I tell people that, the usual reply is, "oh, c'mon. Why lie about it? Everybody has tried pot at least once."

But the fact is I never have tried it. There are any number of reasons for that, none of them necessarily philosophical.

I would guess that most DUers reading this post don't believe me...which sort of proves Rubio's point that denying you've ever smoked pot just makes people believe you're a liar.

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Marco Rubio Got One Thing Right About Answering The Q: Have You Smoked Pot (Original Post) stopbush Feb 2014 OP
Only if they manifest they've never even gotten close to it (and are under age 90) hlthe2b Feb 2014 #1
I didn't say that I've never gotten close to it. I've been offered pot many times, just never did it stopbush Feb 2014 #4
I wsn't at all referring to you, but rather the generic example... hlthe2b Feb 2014 #16
I believe you...I never have, either...nt joeybee12 Feb 2014 #2
What's the weather like in "Pleasantville" today? Bennyboy Feb 2014 #3
Thanks for proving my point. stopbush Feb 2014 #6
Yeah, experience is experience and without it Bennyboy Feb 2014 #12
And many great minds haven't had their minds expanded by drugs. stopbush Feb 2014 #15
It's white port and lemon juice for me! Bennyboy Feb 2014 #28
So just acid and shrooms? snooper2 Feb 2014 #5
Nope. Never even was in a situation to be offered those things. stopbush Feb 2014 #7
Shrooms are no joke.. giftedgirl77 Feb 2014 #9
Did you see the boar after you had found and taken the shrooms? stopbush Feb 2014 #14
We started out on them... giftedgirl77 Feb 2014 #23
I believe you because you gave a straight answer and I have no reason to not believe you. Iggo Feb 2014 #8
You have a point. Politicians are so fearful and gutless at times. stopbush Feb 2014 #10
Rubio lies so much, why start believing him now? I believe you. n/t FSogol Feb 2014 #11
I think he got another thing right: "It's irrelevant." malthaussen Feb 2014 #13
I do think it is relevant if fighting for strict anti-pot laws... Just as sexual orientation MIGHT hlthe2b Feb 2014 #17
But why relevant in that case? malthaussen Feb 2014 #24
I think advocating to punish others for deeds one has done yourself ought to be explained... hlthe2b Feb 2014 #25
That'll work. malthaussen Feb 2014 #27
As I said, I don't think it is 'generally' relevant... hlthe2b Feb 2014 #29
i've never tried pot. people believe me in part because i don't drink or smoke. unblock Feb 2014 #18
Like you, I don't hold it against people if they smoke pot. I'm for legalizing it. stopbush Feb 2014 #20
I believe you. SamKnause Feb 2014 #19
He got another thing right: "it's irrelevant". nt ChisolmTrailDem Feb 2014 #21
Rubio is a Republican politician, so I'd never believe anything he said. Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #22
Guilt by association is a lousy argument. malthaussen Feb 2014 #26
OK, but he shouldn't blame his credibility problems on the question being asked. nt NoGOPZone Feb 2014 #30
I believe you, but Feral Child Feb 2014 #31
I've never made an illegal u-turn Control-Z Feb 2014 #32
I 100% believe you JustAnotherGen Feb 2014 #33

hlthe2b

(102,112 posts)
1. Only if they manifest they've never even gotten close to it (and are under age 90)
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:02 PM
Feb 2014

That's a sheltered existence that I'd have trouble believing...

stopbush

(24,392 posts)
4. I didn't say that I've never gotten close to it. I've been offered pot many times, just never did it
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:05 PM
Feb 2014

There's a difference.

hlthe2b

(102,112 posts)
16. I wsn't at all referring to you, but rather the generic example...
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:20 PM
Feb 2014
I thought use of "they" made that clear, but sorry if not...

stopbush

(24,392 posts)
6. Thanks for proving my point.
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:07 PM
Feb 2014

BTW - would you respond the same way were the topic smoking cigars or drinking gin?

 

Bennyboy

(10,440 posts)
12. Yeah, experience is experience and without it
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:13 PM
Feb 2014

you don't have experience. My experience with pot is a good one, and my experience with gin, cigars is not so good. Without actually expereincing it, how could I know anything about it.

And in the case of mind expansion substances go, if you haven't taken them, you've never had your mind expanded.

it is no coincidence that all but a few of the greatest minds in arts, literature, movies and technology have experience with mind expanding substances.

stopbush

(24,392 posts)
15. And many great minds haven't had their minds expanded by drugs.
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:19 PM
Feb 2014

Your point?

You seem to be getting defensive about this. Why?

BTW - what - exactly - is "mind expansion" when it comes to drugs? How is it different from, say, educating oneself? Being well read? Having a curiosity about the world in general? Learning the nuts and bolts of one's craft and developing that into a personal art?

I spent a lot of years as a performing classical musician. Would "mind expansion" via drugs made me a better or more-creative artist? I don't know, I'm asking.

BTW - I tried gin once. My throat started closing up and I couldn't breathe. Sorta scary. I understand it may be due to the Juniper and the fact that the distillation process for gin isn't as refining as other liquors. Or, may I just have an allergy. Love the smell of gin, tho.

 

Bennyboy

(10,440 posts)
28. It's white port and lemon juice for me!
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:55 PM
Feb 2014

I hate gin. Cannot stand the smell the taste. Love tequila though.

And in answer to your question I am reminded of a Jerry Garcia quote i read once that went like this "had Jerry Garcia never smoked dope, what would he have become? "The entire senior class wants to thank Mr Garcia for his work on Carousel"?

So yeah, I know one hell of a ton of musicians. The ones that are pushing it get high. The ones that are playing covers in a dingy club are the ones that don't get high. The guys who never got out of the bar scene. Of musicians I can only think of a couple that did not have a cannabis background who were truly groundbreaking. (Frank Zappa and Bruce Springsteen). The rest, all of them, have or had one.

So yeah, you might be more creative, I would bet on it in fact. it is hard to put you finger on, but you can't get there without it.

stopbush

(24,392 posts)
7. Nope. Never even was in a situation to be offered those things.
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:10 PM
Feb 2014

I used to love my beer and margaritas, but once we had kids, I ended up being the designated driver. After a while, I lost all cravings and most of my taste for alcohol. I had trouble finishing a single bottle of Stella while watching the Olympics on Sunday.

I'm a cheap date these days.

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
9. Shrooms are no joke..
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:13 PM
Feb 2014

I got chased by a wild boar while hunting for shrooms in FL. At least we are pretty sure it was a boar....

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
23. We started out on them...
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:40 PM
Feb 2014

It's a good thing we didn't run into a panther, I would have tried to bring it home.

Iggo

(47,534 posts)
8. I believe you because you gave a straight answer and I have no reason to not believe you.
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:10 PM
Feb 2014

Rubio danced around so much that I had to guess what he was dancing around.

Guess what I guessed.

stopbush

(24,392 posts)
10. You have a point. Politicians are so fearful and gutless at times.
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:13 PM
Feb 2014

Those times being during their waking hours.

malthaussen

(17,175 posts)
13. I think he got another thing right: "It's irrelevant."
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:14 PM
Feb 2014

As for believing you, why should I not? I have no evidence to the contrary.

-- Mal

hlthe2b

(102,112 posts)
17. I do think it is relevant if fighting for strict anti-pot laws... Just as sexual orientation MIGHT
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:23 PM
Feb 2014

be relevant if fighting against LGBT rights.


Ordinarily, though, I would agree with you... Neither one is relevant as a general matter.

malthaussen

(17,175 posts)
24. But why relevant in that case?
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:42 PM
Feb 2014

Dunno about you, but there were times in my dissolute youth that I did a few things that ought to have been punished. Does this then disqualify me from arguing for punishment for that act?

Not that smoking pot falls under the rubric of something that ought to have been punished, but I'm talking a general principle, here.

-- Mal

hlthe2b

(102,112 posts)
25. I think advocating to punish others for deeds one has done yourself ought to be explained...
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:45 PM
Feb 2014

If a major lesson was learned that shaped ones' views, that is relevant. Conversely, if one just wants to be an authoritarian ass and inflict punishment on others as the ultimate hypocrisy, that, too, is relevant.

malthaussen

(17,175 posts)
27. That'll work.
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:51 PM
Feb 2014

But perhaps only in the context of legislation about that specific peccadillo, not in the context of general candidacy.

-- Mal

hlthe2b

(102,112 posts)
29. As I said, I don't think it is 'generally' relevant...
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 03:02 PM
Feb 2014

but, I do believe in exposing hypocrisy and mal-intent.

unblock

(52,115 posts)
18. i've never tried pot. people believe me in part because i don't drink or smoke.
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:28 PM
Feb 2014

i've always been a "straight arrow". i'm not the least bit judging if others make different decisions, but for me, there are a few things i will never do. maybe it's not entirely rational, but most people seem to figure that if i've never even gotten drunk or smoked, i'm probably telling the truth about never trying weed.

stopbush

(24,392 posts)
20. Like you, I don't hold it against people if they smoke pot. I'm for legalizing it.
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:31 PM
Feb 2014

Has nothing to do with my never trying it.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
22. Rubio is a Republican politician, so I'd never believe anything he said.
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:38 PM
Feb 2014

If a Democrat took the whole 'I have refused to try it' stance I'd not vote for them in a primary because the fact that they think not trying marijuana is a plus shows me they are not my sort of candidate.

malthaussen

(17,175 posts)
26. Guilt by association is a lousy argument.
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:46 PM
Feb 2014

Good for sarcasm, though.

I agree with your point in the body of the post, though. If somebody thinks taking a stand against mj makes him a better candidate, then he's not the better one for me. But the alternative will likely be worse anyway.

-- Mal

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)
32. I've never made an illegal u-turn
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 04:32 PM
Feb 2014

that I know of. So guess I should say I've never intentionally made an illegal u-turn. No one believes me.

JustAnotherGen

(31,780 posts)
33. I 100% believe you
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 04:34 PM
Feb 2014

But this guy is in my age group.

It was easier for me to buy pot, 4, and x when I was 18 than a six pack of beer if I was back home (went to U on the Canadian border and could buy there at 19).

I have a hard time believing he NEVER took a nip when beer, wine, and liquor was so hard to get ahold of in the late 80's/early 90's with the MADD and SADD stuff out there . . .

There was no mothers against weed or students against X.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Marco Rubio Got One Thing...