Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 09:39 PM Feb 2014

Is the FCC Chairman getting ready to take a case-by-case approach to net neutrality?

http://venturebeat.com/2014/02/11/is-the-fcc-chairman-getting-ready-to-take-a-case-by-case-approach-to-net-neutrality/

FCC chairman Tom Wheeler said Monday that he will announce the agency’s proposed plan for an open Internet “in the coming days” – but the plan may disappoint net neutrality advocates.

First, some background. When a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. ruled last month that the FCC does not have the authority to require that Internet service providers treat all traffic equally, it also gave the agency a clear way to obtain that authority, saying the FCC could regulate these providers if it changes how it has chosen to categorize them.

Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC can decide if ISPs are “telecommunications services,” which transmit information and treat all information equally, or “information services,” which process information. Telecommunications services, like wired phone networks, are regulated to be open, common carriers, whereas information processors are left unregulated to promote innovation.

*snip*

Many net neutrality advocates are hoping the FCC will simply correct its previous classification. But that’s not what Wheeler has been signaling in recent weeks.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is the FCC Chairman getting ready to take a case-by-case approach to net neutrality? (Original Post) steve2470 Feb 2014 OP
A case by case basis is not neutral and not net neutrality. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2014 #1
We would expect otherwise from an administration that excels at caving in? villager Feb 2014 #2
"Caving" implies that a non-rigged, non-corporate outcome was desired. woo me with science Feb 2014 #4
When I read 'case by case' I think 'contributor by contributor'... n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2014 #3
Huge K&R woo me with science Feb 2014 #5

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
4. "Caving" implies that a non-rigged, non-corporate outcome was desired.
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 10:03 PM
Feb 2014

This administration has been consistent and aggressive in its work on behalf of corporations and against the interests of ordinary Americans.

They, like the administration before them, have systematically been removing every single avenue the people have left to fight back against the corporate looting of our lives and our futures -- assaulting our right to privacy, our free press, our right to assemble and protest, our protections for journalists and whistleblowers...

With this next massive betrayal, we lose control of the internet...and the corporations gain the means to control our access to information and freedom of association. Look at the wasteland of cable TV. This is NOT just about costs. This is about control of information and communication. The free and open internet was perhaps our last hope for organizing and educating to take back our country from corporate fascism.

This is a horrifying but expected signal from a corporate Trojan horse administration. This is a devastating blow to all Americans.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is the FCC Chairman getti...