Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 01:15 PM Feb 2014

Yay! U.S.A. now rates 46th in press freedom! - RWB (Reporters Without Borders)

Not as bad as Haiti (47) but not as good as Romania (45) or Papua New Guinea (44).

http://rsf.org/index2014/en-americas.php#

In the United States, 9/11 spawned a major conflict between the imperatives of national security and the principles of the constitution’s First Amendment. This amendment enshrines every person’s right to inform and be informed. But the heritage of the 1776 constitution was shaken to its foundations during George W. Bush’s two terms as president by the way journalists were harassed and even imprisoned for refusing to reveal their sources or surrender their files to federal judicial officials.

There has been little improvement in practice under Barack Obama. Rather than pursuing journalists, the emphasis has been on going after their sources, but often using the journalist to identify them. No fewer that eight individuals have been charged under the Espionage Act since Obama became president, compared with three during Bush’s two terms. While 2012 was in part the year of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, 2013 will be remember for the National Security Agency computer specialist Edward Snowden, who exposed the mass surveillance methods developed by the US intelligence agencies.

The whistleblower is the enemy. Hence the 35-year jail term imposed on Private Chelsea/Bradley Manning for being the big WikiLeaks source, an extremely long sentence but nonetheless small in comparison with the 105-year sentence requested for freelance journalist Barrett Brown in a hacking case. Amid an all-out hunt for leaks and sources, 2013 will also be the year of the Associated Press scandal, which came to light when the Department of Justice acknowledged that it had seized the news agency’s phone records.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yay! U.S.A. now rates 46th in press freedom! - RWB (Reporters Without Borders) (Original Post) Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2014 OP
"9/11 changed everything" - translation Rex Feb 2014 #1
...as did the Democrats. villager Feb 2014 #2
Fortunately, we are now being kept safer from the press. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2014 #3
The top 8 and 17 of the top 20 are all European countries. New Zealand, Canada and Jamaica pampango Feb 2014 #4
I'm shocked their synopsis of the USA was that long without even *mentioning* Blue_Tires Feb 2014 #5
Concentrated corporate ownership is why the press is censored, not because of govt. regulation TheMathieu Feb 2014 #8
I only know it all to well Blue_Tires Feb 2014 #9
This has more to do with a concentration of ownership than a government crackdown. nt TheMathieu Feb 2014 #6
That's a big drop. ProSense Feb 2014 #7
Huge K&R. And it's about to get worse. woo me with science Feb 2014 #10
Hillary voted for the Patriot Act... awoke_in_2003 Feb 2014 #11
USA! USA!! USA!!! polichick Feb 2014 #12
We used to laugh at the Soviet newspaper Pravda, which means "Truth," for all the lies it told tclambert Feb 2014 #13
Only Covers The "Informed" Aspect DallasNE Feb 2014 #14
Thanks Bin Laden CFLDem Feb 2014 #15
Jamaica has the most press freedom in the entire hemisphere but we slipped from 13th malaise Feb 2014 #16
Here are some news articles from the last 12 months about press freedom in the U.S. browbery Feb 2014 #17
Thanks for posting that. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2014 #18
Welcome to DU gopiscrap Feb 2014 #19
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
1. "9/11 changed everything" - translation
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 01:19 PM
Feb 2014

"9/11 means the BFEE can now create an oppressive authoritarian enforcement agency that we didn't need, trash the Constitution and suspend laws that protect American citizens."

And of course the M$M lapped it up like obedient dogs.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
2. ...as did the Democrats.
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 01:30 PM
Feb 2014

And as do the apologists for that mewling and lapping, who post here.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
3. Fortunately, we are now being kept safer from the press.
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 01:33 PM
Feb 2014
“News is what somebody somewhere wants to suppress; all the rest is advertising.” Lord Northcliffe

pampango

(24,692 posts)
4. The top 8 and 17 of the top 20 are all European countries. New Zealand, Canada and Jamaica
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 01:39 PM
Feb 2014

are the only non-European countries to break into the top 20.

The 2014 World Press Freedom Index spotlights the negative impact of conflicts on freedom of information and its protagonists. The ranking of some countries has also been affected by a tendency to interpret national security needs in an overly broad and abusive manner to the detriment of the right to inform and be informed. This trend constitutes a growing threat worldwide and is even endangering freedom of information in countries regarded as democracies. Finland tops the index for the fourth year running, closely followed by Netherlands and Norway, like last year. At the other end of the index, the last three positions are again held by Turkmenistan, North Korea and Eritrea, three countries where freedom of information is non-existent. Despite occasional turbulence in the past year, these countries continue to be news and information black holes and living hells for the journalists who inhabit them. This year’s index covers 180 countries, one more than last year. The new entry, Belize, has been assigned an enviable position (29th). Cases of violence against journalists are rare in Belize but there were some problems: defamation suits involving demands for large amounts in damages, national security restrictions on implementation of the Freedom of Information Act and sometimes unfair management of broadcast frequencies.

NOTEWORTHY RISES

Violence against journalists, direct censorship and misuse of judicial proceedings are on the decline in Panama (87th, +25), Dominican Republic (68th, +13), Bolivia (94th, +16) and Ecuador (94th, +25), although in Ecuador the level of media polarization is still high and often detrimental to public debate.

The past year was marked by laudable legislative developments in some countries such as South Africa (42nd, +11), where the president refused to sign a law that would have endangered investigative journalism.

In Georgia (84th, +17), the 2013 presidential election was less tense that the previous year’s parliamentary elections, which were marked by physical attacks and hate campaigns against journalists. Thanks to political cohabitation and then a change of government through the polls, Georgia has recovered some of the terrain lost in recent years as the Saakashvili administration’s reforming zeal ran out of steam. Media polarization will nonetheless continue to be a challenge in the coming years.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
5. I'm shocked their synopsis of the USA was that long without even *mentioning*
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 01:40 PM
Feb 2014

monopolies and concentrated corporate ownership as a primary issue; especially since it got mentioned repeatedly with their analysis of South America...


FWIW The Russian Federation is #149...I'd love to know Snowden/Greenwald's thoughts on that...

 

TheMathieu

(456 posts)
8. Concentrated corporate ownership is why the press is censored, not because of govt. regulation
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 01:44 PM
Feb 2014

but because of a lack of it.

When you go from 50 media companies to 6, it limits what is said.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
7. That's a big drop.
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 01:41 PM
Feb 2014

"Yay! U.S.A. now rates 46th in press freedom! - RWB (Reporters Without Borders)"

Last year the U.S. was ranked 32, which is still horrible.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Press_Freedom_Index

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
10. Huge K&R. And it's about to get worse.
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 02:27 PM
Feb 2014


The administration signalled yesterday that they will not defend net neutrality.

Is the FCC Chairman getting ready to take a case-by-case approach to net neutrality?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4484820


With this next massive betrayal, we lose control of the internet...and the corporations gain the means to control our access to information and freedom of association. Look at the wasteland of cable TV. This is NOT just about costs. This is about control of information and communication. The free and open internet was perhaps our last hope for organizing and educating to take back our country from corporate fascism.

This corporate administration, like the administration before them, have systematically been removing every single avenue the people have left to fight back against the corporate looting of our lives and our futures. They are criminalizing investigative journalism, chilling our free press, implementing surveillance, and savaging protections for journalists and whistleblowers... And now they will further assault freedom of the press by opening the door for corporate control of the internet.

Thank you. K&R
 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
11. Hillary voted for the Patriot Act...
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 03:18 PM
Feb 2014

then voted against its renewal, when it was too late and, coincidently, shortly before her campaign.

tclambert

(11,085 posts)
13. We used to laugh at the Soviet newspaper Pravda, which means "Truth," for all the lies it told
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 04:07 PM
Feb 2014

and now we have Fox News, and every newspaper turned into a grocery store tabloid. The standards of gossip columns took over all of journalism. "Reporters" now just look for a juicy quote, but never, ever try to verify the content of the quote. You know, except on the comedy shows where they point out the hypocrisies for the humor value. Journalists used to have a motto, "If your mother says she loves you--check it out."

Dick Cheney says to Wolf Blitzer, "You've got to deal with the reality on the ground." (1/24/2007) And Blitzer doesn't call him on the absurdity of HIM saying that. You have to wait for Jon Stewart to show video clips of Cheney clearly and repeatedly substituting his wishful thinking for anything close to the "reality on the ground." Wolf Blitzer kept a straight face and just moved on to his next programmed question.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
14. Only Covers The "Informed" Aspect
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 04:31 PM
Feb 2014

It does not cover the equally "to be informed" aspect to free speech. Media that as policy misinforms is every bit as big of a problem as the wrongs listed here and perhaps more so. And this problem is far from limited to Fox News though they are the worst (along with hate radio). Manning should have been sent to jail though one could make a case that the sentence is excessive.

 

browbery

(11 posts)
17. Here are some news articles from the last 12 months about press freedom in the U.S.
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 01:19 PM
Feb 2014

I just came across this thread while googling on the subject. I am posting links to some news articles that were published during the last 12 months:


Gov't obtains wide AP phone records in probe: http://news.yahoo.com/govt-obtains-wide-ap-phone-records-probe-202010831.html

Obtaining AP phone records required Holder’s approval: http://washingtonexaminer.com/obtaining-ap-phone-records-required-holders-approval/article/2529585

Phone Intercepts by U.S. Hurts News Flow, AP Chief Says: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-19/phone-intercepts-by-u-s-hurts-news-flow-ap-chief-says.html

Federal government falsely accused James Rosen, a law abiding news reporter, of being “an aider and abettor and/or co-conspirator” in a criminal investigation: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/05/the-doj-versus-journalist-gmail.html

The Obama administration has moved beyond protecting government secrets to threatening fundamental freedoms of the press to gather news. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/22/opinion/another-chilling-leak-investigation.html?_r=0

To treat a reporter as a criminal for doing his job — seeking out information the government doesn’t want made public — deprives Americans of the First Amendment freedom on which all other constitutional rights are based. http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-in-ap-rosen-investigations-government-makes-criminals-of-reporters/2013/05/21/377af392-c24e-11e2-914f-a7aba60512a7_story.html?hpid=z2

Obama brings chilling effect on journalism. A report finds the U.S. government’s aggressive prosecution of leaks and efforts to control information are having a chilling effect on journalists and government whistle-blowers.http://www.nbc11news.com/news/nationalnews/headlines/Report-Obama-brings-chilling-effect-on-journalism-227224781.html

Last May the FCC proposed an initiative to thrust the federal government into newsrooms across the country. With its “Multi-Market Study of Critical Information Needs,” or CIN, the agency plans to send researchers to grill reporters, editors and station owners about how they decide which stories to run. … the FCC’s queries may be hard for the broadcasters to ignore. They would be out of business without an FCC license… why does the CIN study include newspapers when the FCC has no authority to regulate print media? http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304680904579366903828260732

The First Amendment says “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…” But under the Obama administration, the Federal Communications Commission is planning to send government contractors into the nation’s newsrooms to determine whether journalists are producing articles, television reports, Internet content, and commentary that meets the public’s “critical information needs.” Those “needs” will be defined by the administration, and news outlets that do not comply with the government’s standards could face an uncertain future. It’s hard to imagine a project more at odds with the First Amendment...
If the FCC goes forward, it’s not clear what will happen to news organizations that fall short of the new government standards. Perhaps they will be disciplined. Or perhaps the very threat of investigating their methods will nudge them into compliance with the administration’s journalistic agenda. What is sure is that it will be a gross violation of constitutional rights. http://washingtonexaminer.com/new-obama-initiative-tramples-first-amendment-protections/article/2544363

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
18. Thanks for posting that.
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 02:19 PM
Feb 2014
A free press can, of course, be good or bad, but, most certainly without freedom, the press will never be anything but bad.
Albert Camus
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yay! U.S.A. now rates 46...