General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTed Cruz: Birkenstock-wearing, tree-hugging Greenpeace activists should love Keystone pipeline
What a weird thing to say.
Ted Cruz Makes Case for Keystone XL to Birkenstock-Wearing, Tree-Hugging Activists
If youre a Birkenstock-wearing, tree-hugging Greenpeace activist, you should love the Keystone pipeline, Cruz said at the Heritage Actions Conservative Policy Summit on Monday.
Cruz, R-Texas, focused his remarks on a push to deregulate the controversial practice of hydraulic fracking and expanding offshore exploration, and in the process, appealed to any environmentalists listening in on his remarks.
The Canadians are not going to leave the tar sands unmolested, Cruz said. Theyll send it to China to be refined there and it will be refined in a much, much dirtier way.
If your concern is the environment, the last thing you want to do is send that oil to China to be refined there, which will be far more damage to the environment than refining it in the U.S., where it would generate good, high paying jobs, he added.
What a convoluted argument.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,588 posts)I am gobsmacked.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)It just about says it all, doesn't it?
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,588 posts)I love it!
And I don't get many chances to use it...
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)TheMathieu
(456 posts)hatrack
(59,583 posts)Other than that, nice job "reaching out", you condescending pile of dog shit.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Lint Head
(15,064 posts)How does someone like Ted Cruz, who has no brain whatsoever, come up with this shit? It's amazing? He must be channeling his hero Joesph McCarthy. Or Crazy Guggenheim. Wow! Is he Mensa? Or just fuckin' around?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)The extraction schedule in Canada isn't based on whether there's a pipeline or not.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)That is not my point.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)If the concern is "I don't want the oil being piped over the US where it might spill in my backyard", I get that (and mostly agree), but I usually see people presenting Keystone as a "we need to be extracting and refining less oil" argument, rather than "I want the spills to be elsewhere" argument.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)to our environment, to local areas, with such obvious opposition....then it is a simple thing to understand.
It's a matter of a company from another country doing something that can cause great harm with spillage, something that runs people from their homes by eminent domain.
It's just that simple. It is dead wrong.
Rex
(65,616 posts)rustydog
(9,186 posts)Right?
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Last edited Thu Feb 13, 2014, 05:03 AM - Edit history (1)
Mayflower, Arkansas
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)On msnbc. I think Cruz watches ted, he's busted.