Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Thu Feb 13, 2014, 09:28 AM Feb 2014

Obamacare’s Founding CEO Wants To Bring Single Payer To MA


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/donald-berwick-single-payer-massachusetts-governor-obamacare

On his first day as governor of Massachusetts, Donald Berwick promises to set up a commission tasked with finding a way to bring single payer to the Bay State. It'll have report back to him within a year -- ideally sooner.

Having run Medicare and Obamacare in Washington for 17 months, he has concluded that the existing hybrid system is too cumbersome and expensive, and that single payer is the right fix. And he's the only candidate in this year's contest who dares to go there.

"The Affordable Care Act is a majestic step forward for this country -- for the only nation that hasn't made health care a human right yet. But luckily I'm in a state that's able to take even a bigger step," Berwick told TPM in an interview. "And a single payer option -- even if the country is not ready for it, I think Massachusetts is ready and it's worth exploring."

A political novice, Berwick is an underdog candidate for the Democratic nomination in the 2014 elections -- the most outspoken progressive in the race. A pediatrician, Harvard health policy professor and former health care executive, his talent for -- and obsession with -- health management caught the eye of President Barack Obama, who in 2010 appointed him to be the Administrator of the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which was tasked with getting Obamacare off the ground in its infancy. Berwick left in December 2011, after his recess appointment expired and Senate Republicans refused to confirm him.

"I've been looking hard at the Massachusetts budget and I've become more aware than ever of how the rising costs of health care are taking opportunity away from other investments," he said. "I saw it in Washington, and I see it in Massachusetts. We need to find money for transportation, education, the social safety net. ... And so I feel a sense of urgency about getting costs under control without harming patients at all."
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obamacare’s Founding CEO Wants To Bring Single Payer To MA (Original Post) eridani Feb 2014 OP
I think the biggest mistake in passing the ACA was in taking Single Payer off the table el_bryanto Feb 2014 #1
Can you see it happening in red states? eridani Feb 2014 #2
I don't disagree. I just think that single payer should have been taken more seriously el_bryanto Feb 2014 #4
I think you are right and I think Mass. could lead the way to single payer. rgbecker Feb 2014 #5
Ha - no repeal and replace! JustAnotherGen Feb 2014 #3
Obamacare will make it easier ProSense Feb 2014 #6
In total absolute agreement! JustAnotherGen Feb 2014 #8
And I think businesses would flock there if they do Marrah_G Feb 2014 #7

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
1. I think the biggest mistake in passing the ACA was in taking Single Payer off the table
Thu Feb 13, 2014, 09:31 AM
Feb 2014

too early in the negotiations. Yes - it's likely they would have had to eventually take it off to get anything passed and yes, the ACA is better than what we had before. But it would have given us a stronger starting point.

Bryant

eridani

(51,907 posts)
2. Can you see it happening in red states?
Thu Feb 13, 2014, 09:34 AM
Feb 2014

I can't. I think the only way forward is for more progressive states to take the lead and implement single payer at the state level.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
4. I don't disagree. I just think that single payer should have been taken more seriously
Thu Feb 13, 2014, 09:47 AM
Feb 2014

during the negotiations for what became the ACA.

Basically we had a discourse that went like this.

Republicans: Socialized medicine bad!

Democrats: Yes, socialized medicine bad!

I wish instead we would have had this conversation

Republicans: Socialized medicine bad!

Democrats: Actually single payer has a lot of benefits to the American people; it provides better care with less cost both to our citizens and to the nation as a whole.

Republicans: Me never vote for socialized medicine!

For one thing it would make this current transition into states trying Single Payer easier as more citizens would know what Single Payer is and have a better understanding of how it can benefit us.

Bryant

rgbecker

(4,826 posts)
5. I think you are right and I think Mass. could lead the way to single payer.
Thu Feb 13, 2014, 09:57 AM
Feb 2014

That said, this guy has the guy has the same chance of becoming governor of Mass as there being a snow ball in Hell.

We need to focus on Vermont where the wheels of single payer are in motion.

JustAnotherGen

(31,808 posts)
3. Ha - no repeal and replace!
Thu Feb 13, 2014, 09:41 AM
Feb 2014

Keep moving forward to the end game - if Massachusetts can keep it's eye on the prize - we'll eventually get there.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
6. Obamacare will make it easier
Thu Feb 13, 2014, 09:59 AM
Feb 2014
Single Payer movement in the era of Obamacare
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/07/30/1226609/-Single-Payer-movement-in-the-era-of-Obamacare

Fully funded by Obamacare:

Lessons from Vermont's Health Care Reform

By Laura K. Grubb, M.D.
The New England Journal of Medicine, April 4, 2013

In May 2011, Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin signed legislation to implement Green Mountain Care (GMC), a single-payer, publicly financed, universal health care system. Vermont's reform law passed 15 months after the historic federal Affordable Care Act (ACA) became law. In passing reforms, Vermont took matters into its own hands and is well ahead of most other states in its efforts to implement federal and state health care reforms by 2014. The Supreme Court decision last June to uphold most of the ACA left many states scrambling, since they had postponed reforms pending the judgment. Although Vermont is a small state, its reform efforts provide valuable lessons for other states in implementing ACA reforms.

<...>

Finally, Vermont policymakers are maximizing federal financing and have projected cost savings. In January 2013, the state released a 156-page financing plan for its single-payer arrangement; the plan outlines federal financing sources and the anticipated generation of savings. Vermont has been awarded more than $250 million in federal funding for its state exchange — the fifth-highest amount among the states, although Vermont has the country's second-smallest state population. “We feel strongly that the exchange is not the answer to all of Vermont's health care problems,” Shumlin remarked, explaining that “the exchange is helpful to Vermont to bring us federal dollars to achieve our single-payer goal.”3 In fact, state exchange development will be 100% federally funded.4

- more -

http://www.pnhp.org/news/2013/april/lessons-from-vermonts-health-care-reform


Section 1332 of the health care law:

State single payer waiver provisions in the Senate healthcare bill - legislative language and fact sheet from Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders

Why the 1332 Waiver in the Senate Health Reform Bill is the Only Opportunity for State Single Payer Systems Under the Bill

The health care reform bill passed by the Senate requires that all states set up Exchanges through which private insurance companies could sell their plans. Because federal laws preempt state laws, the federal health care reform bill would supplant any state attempt to set up a single payer system in lieu of an Exchange, which by its nature calls for multiple payers to compete. If the Senate bill is enacted, the only opportunity for states to move toward a single payer system is found in Section 1332. This section would allow a state with a plan that meets certain coverage and affordability requirements to waive out of the requirement to set up an Exchange for private insurance companies. Only with such a waiver could a state move in the direction of a single payer system.

- more -

http://www.pnhp.org/news/2010/march/state-single-payer-waiver-provisions-in-the-senate-healthcare-bill-legislative-langu


Release: President Endorses State Waiver Proposal

Vermont Delegation and Gov. Shumlin Hail Obama Endorsement of State Health Reform Waiver Legislation

WASHINGTON, Feb. 28 - The Vermont congressional delegation and Gov. Peter Shumlin today hailed President Obama's endorsement of legislation allowing states to provide better health care at a lower cost starting in 2014.

At a meeting of the National Governors Association Monday morning, Obama announced his support for amending the Affordable Care Act to allow states like Vermont to seek a federal waiver to the new law three years earlier than currently allowed. States would be required to design plans that are at least as comprehensive and affordable as the federal model and cover at least as many people

Last month Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) introduced in the Senate and Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) introduced in the House legislation that would advance the date waivers would be accepted from 2017 to 2014. The three joined Gov. Shumlin at a Montpelier press conference to announce the legislation, which would provide Vermont the flexibility it needs to adopt reforms Shumlin is pursuing.

Leahy said, "This is a wise decision that keeps in focus the goal of continually improving health care in America. I applaud President Obama and Secretary Sebelius for supporting efforts by Vermont and other states to go above and beyond what the Affordable Care Act requires. They know that the federal government does not have a monopoly on good ideas, and innovations by the states will prove - and improve --- the benefits of health insurance reform, on the ground, and in practice. While some in Washington want to turn the clock back and repeal the new health reform law, Vermont and other states want to move ahead. Vermont has already been working hard to improve the state's system of health care, and passage of the delegation's waiver bill will move our state one step closer to that goal."

Sanders said, "At a time when 50 million Americans lack health insurance and when the cost of health care continues to soar, it is my strong hope that Vermont will lead the nation in a new direction through a Medicare-for-all, single-payer approach. I am delighted that President Obama announced today that he will, in fact, support allowing states to innovate with health coverage models sooner rather than later. I worked hard to draft and secure the waiver provision in the health reform law and I am very pleased the president now agrees that we should make it available in 2014 as originally intended. While there is a lot of work to be done, I look forward to working with Sens. Leahy, Wyden, Inouye, Brown and others in the Senate and Rep. Welch and others in the House to get this done as soon as possible."

Welch said, "President Obama's support for allowing states to innovate sooner is a good news for Vermont and all states looking to tailor health care reform to individual states' circumstances. This legislation will give Vermont a green light to lead the nation in providing quality health care at a lower cost. I'm hopeful that Democrats and Republicans alike will support this practical step to give states flexibility to achieve progress their own way."

Shumlin said, "I was excited to learn about this today during a visit to the White House. All along officials from Health and Human Services have expressed a willingness to work with us, as long as we don't compromise standards under the law. I think this is an excellent example of how we can work together to control skyrocketing health care costs and implement meaningful health care reform as soon as possible."

A fact sheet on the delegation's "State Leadership in Healthcare Act" is available here.

http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=44a664de-8e92-43f4-a871-d26e0b5a252d


FACT SHEET

"State Leadership in Healthcare Act‟

Section 1332 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act – the “Waiver for State Innovation” – allows states to waiver out of some of the requirement of federal health reform if they meet certain standards. The provision in the new law was authored by Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and strongly supported by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.).

The Sanders-Leahy-Welch “State Leadership in Healthcare Act” moves the availability of state waivers from 2017 to 2014. This would allow a state to avoid the expense of setting up an exchange – which is otherwise required in every state in 2014 – only to dismantle it later.

The federal waiver would allow a state to:

a) Collect all the federal funding and use for financing coverage for individuals through a plan designed by and for that state.
b) Coordinates this waiver process with Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP waiver processes that may be required depending on the design of the system. The state

The federal waiver would not allow a state to:
a) Offer lower quality or less affordable care to their residents than would be available in the exchange.
b) Obtain waivers from the health insurance market reforms implemented under the law such as those benefiting ending the use of pre-existing conditions to exclude individuals from coverage or those allowing young adults to stay on their parents’ plans longer.


How does the waiver provision of the law work?
Step 1: The state passes a law to provide health insurance to its citizens.
Step 2: The Secretary of Health and Human Services and Secretary of the Treasury review the state law and determine that the plan is:

a) At least as comprehensive as its residents would receive in the exchange;
b) At least as affordable;
c) Deficit neutral to the federal government; and,
d) Covers at least as many people.


Step 3: If the federal government finds that the alternative state system meets these requirements without certain federal rules, states can get a waiver. The state plan could receive waivers from:

a) The section requiring establishment of the exchange
b) The designs for how federal subsidies would have to reduce premiums and co-pays.
c) The employer penalty for providing coverage
d) The individual mandate.


http://www.sanders.senate.gov/graphics/011411state_waiver_fact_sheet.pdf

The Affordable Care Act: Supporting State Innovation
http://www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/2012/02/state-innovation02222012a.html




JustAnotherGen

(31,808 posts)
8. In total absolute agreement!
Thu Feb 13, 2014, 10:38 AM
Feb 2014

So much of what is good about this country started out as a 'good first attempt'. In 40 years I expect to my future grandchildren - without Obamacare - you Fould never have had Medicare For All!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obamacare’s Founding CEO ...