General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublican's next big Brain Storm, They want to repeal the 17th Amendment
Isaacson says he'd like to repeal 17th AmendmentJUNEAU, Alaska (AP) A North Pole legislator says he'd like to repeal the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which allows the people of a given state to elect their U.S. senators.
Rep. Doug Isaacson made the comment during discussion on a proposed amendment to Alaska's constitution that would make the attorney general an elected post rather than an appointed one.
Isaacson said he has great confidence in the people. But he says we sometimes make mistakes as voters and correct those later on.
He said he could see someone be elected attorney general who comes across well but delivers poorly.
He said states lost their powers to control congressional and federal overreach when the power for state Legislatures to send people to the Senate was lost with passage of the 17th Amendment.
http://www.kinyradio.com/juneaunews/latest_juneau_news.html
mikeysnot
(4,756 posts)until they are against it...
Distant Quasar
(142 posts)I'm sure many conservatives would like to restore property qualifications for voting, as well.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Of course in many states, including ones with substantial Democratic minorities, they have a lock on the legislature so this works out well for them.
Bryant
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)A senate that represents Koch-controlled state legislatures is just what the corporatists desire.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)struggle4progress
(118,237 posts)are statewide elections and so cannot easily be controlled by gerrymandering, unlike Federal House and state legislature elections. Repeal of the 17th amendment would mean Federal Senate elections can once again be controlled by gerrymandering
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)In THEORY, the original design of Congress was good. Senate represents the states directly and the House represents the people directly. However, like many things, it doesn't work well in the real world, or when circumstances change over time. That's why the 17th Amendment was passed.
treestar
(82,383 posts)right wingers needs to get a grip.
struggle4progress
(118,237 posts)By Todd J. Gillman
3:32 pm on December 5, 2013
... The 17th Amendment was ratified in 1913 amid dismay that powerful federal lawmakers were sometimes picked through corruption and backroom deals ... Cruz spoke over lunch to a policy summit of the American Legislative Exchange Council, a controversial group that for years has quietly circulated model legislation on anything from voter ID rules to tax policy. He got standing ovations ...
http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/2013/12/ted-cruz-at-alec-summit-end-direct-vote-for-senators.html/
So --- whenever you need to talk about the 17th amendment, be sure to put in a bad word for Cruz and for ALEC