Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Archae

(46,301 posts) Mon Feb 17, 2014, 11:58 AM Feb 2014

Wy the hell was this loser on TV at all?

Mitt Romney was on "Meet The Depressed" Sunday.

Why, I have no idea.
As usual, he spun his own revisionist history and idiotic views.

http://crooksandliars.com/2014/02/romney-marriage-shouldnt-change-good-ol
http://crooksandliars.com/2014/02/mitt-romney-accuses-putin-using-olympics

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wy the hell was this loser on TV at all? (Original Post) Archae Feb 2014 OP

Just one wife? I thought he is a Mormon jakeXT Feb 2014 #1

Mainstream Mormons stopped practicing pologamy in el_bryanto Feb 2014 #2

They have broken his rule with 100 years jakeXT Feb 2014 #3

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)

1. Just one wife? I thought he is a Mormon

Reply to Archae (Original post)

Mon Feb 17, 2014, 12:02 PM

Feb 2014

Well, I think marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman," the former GOP nominee said.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)

2. Mainstream Mormons stopped practicing pologamy in

Reply to jakeXT (Reply #1)

Mon Feb 17, 2014, 12:06 PM

Feb 2014

the late 1800s. They officially ended the practice in 1890, although some people continued to practice up until 1904 when they clarified instructions and more firmly ended it.

So more than 100 years ago? But don't let that get in the way of a good quip.

Bryant

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)

3. They have broken his rule with 100 years

Reply to el_bryanto (Reply #2)

Mon Feb 17, 2014, 12:21 PM

Feb 2014

Former Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney on Sunday said that the notion of marriage should not evolve from what it was 2,000 or 3,000 years ago ...

Reply to this discussion