Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLIBERTARIANS' ANTI-GAY DEBACLE
Libertarians who dont understand liberty: Why the Kansas anti-gay bill is so absurdDo they even understand what liberty means? Why their support for an anti-LGBT bill in Kansas raises serious doubts
MATT BRUENIG
Kansas latest effort to promote discrimination against gays has managed to reopen discussions about the nature of the states role in so-called private discrimination. Although conservatives and libertarians like to pretend economic discrimination does not involve state action, the reality is that the state is almost always involved as the background enforcer of such discrimination.
To understand why this is true, a short jaunt through our countrys history is necessary. For a long time in this country, white homeowners in a neighborhood would place racially restrictive covenants on their houses to prevent the houses from being sold to non-white people down the line. In 1948, the Supreme Court ruled in Shelley v. Kraemer that courts could not enforce these racially restrictive housing covenants, effectively neutering them as binding contractual instruments.
The most interesting thing about the Shelley case is the reasoning the Supreme Court used to arrive at its decision. On first glance, the decision might seem a bit strange. Why cant a group of private white citizens come together and make private agreements with one another to not sell their homes to non-whites? Whats unconstitutional about that? Thats just freedom and liberty, isnt it?
Indeed, the court explicitly held that the agreements are themselves constitutional. The problem is that the agreements do not enforce themselves. It is the state, through its court system and the police, that is charged with actually booting out a black person who comes into ownership of a house in violation of a racially restrictive covenant. And when the state acts as the enforcer of the covenant, that enforcement action involves racially discriminatory state action that violates the Constitution.
more
http://www.salon.com/2014/02/18/libertarians_who_dont_understand_liberty_why_the_kansas_anti_gay_bill_is_absurd/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 628 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
LIBERTARIANS' ANTI-GAY DEBACLE (Original Post)
DonViejo
Feb 2014
OP
RKP5637
(67,104 posts)1. Just the fact they vote these critters into office should give one pause! n/t
shenmue
(38,506 posts)2. I thought libertarians were supposed to be for more liberty
Huh?
alp227
(32,018 posts)3. I guess there's a reason there's an I in libertarian...
as long as the right type of people have the freedom it's all good.