General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat It Means to Treat Kate Upton Like the Successful, Autonomous Person That She Is
By all outward appearances, Kate Upton is winning life. Born in America, raised in material comfort, and blessed with the athletic talent to win national equestrian competitions as a teen, she is now 20 years young, an enviable age to be. She's also rich, famous, beautiful, and successful, having been the face of Guess, a cover model for the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue, a mainstay in glossy fashion magazines, and an actress with roles in two films to her credits.
...
Success has attracted the fans you'd expect. One fan, Los Angeles teenager Jake Davidson, is typical in some ways: He has a crush on the supermodel and wishes he could take her to his high school prom.
Atypically, he actually asked her to go:
...
So what's left to talk about? A provocative Amanda Marcotte item titled, "Jake Davidson Asking Out Kate Upton Isn't Cute. It's Creepy." Take a look for yourself before I hint at my reaction to it:
"But her 'yes' would have reinforced the idea that women owe something--attention, time, sex--to men just because they've asked nicely. Or paid a compliment. Or bought a drink."
...
This argument is strange in part because it proceeds as if an experience very common to celebrities of both genders is unique to women. I don't just mean the general phenomenon of random people seeking photos or photographs or otherwise harassing famous people, who must either respond with time and attention or risk looking like entitled jerks. I mean that prom invitations are a thing. Here's one of many YouTube prom invitations to Justin Bieber. Here's a teen asking Justin Timberlake to be her date. Last year, an 18-year-old took to Twitter to ask a 23-year-old NFL player if he would accompany her to prom. He said yes and picked her up in a Lamborghini. Of course, most celebrity invitations end in a "no," or even a refusal to directly respond, and while that may make some people regard the star as less "nice," is that really so terrible?
But I object to Marcotte's argument in a deeper way. Her ultimate purpose is pushing back against real, pervasive problems that women face: street harassment, rape, spousal abuse. That's a vital project. And those scourges are partly a function of the perpetrators' entitlement. In this instance, however, her focus on those themes has caused her to treat two individuals, Upton and Davidson, as if they are stand-ins for their genders rather than individuals. She has also portrayed a strong, successful woman as if she's a humiliated victim. In doing so, she diminishes Upton and vests Davidson with more power than he possesses or ought to possess.
...
But there are limits to how far they can take us. Group dynamics cannot be mapped onto individuals nearly so neatly as Marcotte attempts it. Her ideology causes her to write as if she doesn't understand what is plain to most observers: Kate Upton is far more privileged, powerful, culturally savvy, and capable of fully exercising her autonomy than the vast majority of straight white males in America, and certainly more than a dateless, non-celebrity 18-year-old high school student on YouTube.
http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/04/what-it-means-to-treat-kate-upton-like-the-successful-autonomous-person-that-she-is/274555/
quinnox
(20,600 posts)To me, she reminds me of the former Guess model, who unfortunately had a tragic end, Anna Nicole Smith, in that she has the same kind of body type and look, a blonde bombshell.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)that is actually personal, to pick the man she wants among the many that want her and not to be bothered by the rest.
The disadvantage to the dateless 18 year old male is that the real girls don't look so good. That's the price of the media, if you pay a lot of attention to it. The .0000000000001% are seen every day and everyone else ends up defined in terms of imperfection from that. Sounds sexually repressive, really.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)opiate69
(10,129 posts)The imbecile who called people who defended the accused in the Duke case "rape-loving scum."