Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,961 posts)
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 05:46 PM Feb 2014

Sen Whitehouse & Rep Waxman Release Letter Shaming Sen McCain & Former Rep Gingrich

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Congressman Henry Waxman released a letter to Senator John McCain and former Representative Newt Gingrich

February 20, 2014

The Honorable John McCain
241 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

The Honorable Newt Gingrich
Gingrich Productions
4501 North Fairfax Drive
Suite 900
Arlington, VA 22203
Dear Senator McCain and Mr. Gingrich:

Over the weekend, Secretary of State John Kerry gave a powerful and important speech in Indonesia about the dangers of climate change. Secretary Kerry accurately said, “When I think about the array of global threats … terrorism, epidemics, poverty, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction … the reality is that climate change ranks right up there with every single one of them.”

Your reaction was disappointing. Senator McCain asked, “On what planet does he reside?” Mr. Gingrich called the Secretary “delusional” and “dangerous to our safety.”

You should know that Secretary Kerry’s assessment of the risks we face is consistent with those of national security experts of unimpeachable credentials. For example:

• Admiral Samuel J. Locklear III, Chief of U.S. military forces in the Pacific region, said that the biggest long-term security threat in the region is climate change because it “is probably the most likely thing that is going to happen . . . that will cripple the security environment, probably more likely than the other scenarios we all often talk about.”

• General Anthony Zinni, the former Commander-in-Chief of U.S. Central Command, warned, “You may also have a population that is traumatized by an event or a change in conditions triggered by climate change. … Then you can be faced with a collapsing state. And these end up as breeding grounds for instability, for insurgencies, for warlords. You start to see extremism. These places act like Petri dishes for extremism and for terrorist networks.”

• Robert Gates, the former Defense Secretary, said, “over the next 20 years and more certain pressures – population, resource, energy, climate, economic, and environmental – could combine with rapid cultural, social, and technological change to produce new sources of deprivation, rage, and instability. … I believe the most persistent and dangerous threats will come less from ambitious states than failing ones that cannot meet the basic needs – much less aspirations – of their people.”

• Admiral Michael Mullen, the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, stated, “The scarcity of an potential competition for resources like water, food and space, compounded by the influx of refugees if coastal lands are lost, does not only create a humanitarian crisis but it creates conditions of hopelessness that could lead to failed states and make populations vulnerable to radicalization.”

• Admiral John Nathan, former Commander of the U.S. Fleet Forces, predicted, “There are serious risks to doing nothing about climate change. We can pay now or we’re going to pay more later.”

• James Clapper, the Director of the National Intelligence, testified, “there will almost assuredly be security concerns with respect to … energy and climate change. Environmental stresses are not just humanitarian issues. They legitimately threaten regional stability.”

• Thomas Fingar, the former Chairman of the National Intelligence Council, concluded, “We judge global climate change will have wide-ranging implications for US national security interests.”

• Hans Blix, the former chief UN weapons inspector, said he thought climate change posed a greater threat to the planet than nuclear proliferation.

You may also want to review the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review, which called climate change “an accelerant of instability or conflict” that “could have significant geopolitical impacts around the world, contributing to poverty, environmental degradation, and the further weakening of fragile governments.”

These concerns about the profound risks of climate change are shared by distinguished world leaders. Last month, Kofi Annan, the former Secretary General of the United Nations, wrote in the Washington Post, “Climate change is the biggest challenge of our time. It threatens the well-being of hundreds of millions of people today and many billions more in the future.” Christine Lagarde, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, said last year that climate change has the “potential for major social and economic disruption.” And Dr. Jim Yong Kim, President of the World Bank Group, stated that if we fail to confront climate change “we could witness the rolling back of decades of development gains and force tens of millions more to live in poverty.”

You may also want to reflect on what Robert Rubin, the widely respected former Treasury Secretary, said just last month about climate change: “There are a lot of really significant, monumental issues facing the global economy, but this supersedes them all.”

Senator McCain made a particular point of criticizing Secretary Kerry for talking about climate change “when we have got 130,000 people in Syria killed.” This is an inaccurate criticism because Secretary Kerry has been devoting extensive attention to Syria. It is also uninformed. There are experts who believe that climate change and the extended drought is one of the underlying causes of the conflicts in Syria. As the New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman wrote, tensions in the Middle East have been “driven not only by political and economic stresses, but, less visibly, by environmental, population and climate stresses as well. If we focus only on the former and not the latter, we will never be able to help stabilize these societies.”

Secretary Kerry needs allies in this fight for the future of our planet. History will not look back and fault him for leading the charge to prevent the worst impacts of climate change while we still have time. But history may question why Republican leaders who were once their party's champions on climate change fled the field at a crucial moment.

Sincerely,

Rep. Henry A. Waxman

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse

http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/sites/default/files/documents/McCain-Gingrich-Reaction-to-Kerry-Climate-Speech-2014-2-20.pdf

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sen Whitehouse & Rep Waxman Release Letter Shaming Sen McCain & Former Rep Gingrich (Original Post) kpete Feb 2014 OP
The Republicons are AWOL on climate change Berlum Feb 2014 #1
climate change kardonb Feb 2014 #11
OUR children- damned republicans certainot Feb 2014 #12
They are more worried about a legacy of debt left to the grandkids. Ilsa Feb 2014 #13
You are partly right: truebluegreen Feb 2014 #18
+1 nt bemildred Feb 2014 #2
They OUGHT to be ashamed, but they won't be. Shrike47 Feb 2014 #3
if it costs their donors a penny, they deny it.... spanone Feb 2014 #4
Ding ding we have a winner malaise Feb 2014 #6
Kick! sheshe2 Feb 2014 #5
It is impossible to shame a Republican, they are completely Shameless Bandit Feb 2014 #7
Excellent, excellent, excellent. northoftheborder Feb 2014 #8
The Carbon Lobby spends hundreds of billions of dollars buying politicians and votes. Ikonoklast Feb 2014 #9
Wow, that's a sobering letter. fleabiscuit Feb 2014 #10
+ What did they used to say about not criticizing a Pres on foreign soil? thesquanderer Feb 2014 #14
Honorable? GeorgeGist Feb 2014 #15
"... a lot of really significant, monumental issues facing the global economy, but this supersedes Coyotl Feb 2014 #16
Check out this video Samantha Feb 2014 #17
GOOD ON Sen Whitehouse and Rep Waxman@! Cha Feb 2014 #19

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
1. The Republicons are AWOL on climate change
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 05:49 PM
Feb 2014

...and AWOL in their responsibility to their children, grandchildren and great grandchildren.

 

kardonb

(777 posts)
11. climate change
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 08:25 PM
Feb 2014

Never confuse repugs with facts , they just don't like them when they don't suit their ideological thick-headedness .

Ilsa

(61,690 posts)
13. They are more worried about a legacy of debt left to the grandkids.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 08:46 PM
Feb 2014

They are in denial about a legacy of mass flooding, famine, drought, and weather extremes.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
18. You are partly right:
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 12:18 AM
Feb 2014

they don't give a rip about a legacy of debt. If they did, they would embrace policies that saved money and/or raised revenue, instead of ALWAYS and ONLY pushing for tax cuts for the wealthy.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
9. The Carbon Lobby spends hundreds of billions of dollars buying politicians and votes.
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 08:12 PM
Feb 2014

McCain's many houses says that you are wrong.

thesquanderer

(11,972 posts)
14. + What did they used to say about not criticizing a Pres on foreign soil?
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 08:49 PM
Feb 2014

I guess his sec'y of state is fair game, though.

Not that I put any stock in the "don't criticize the Pres on foreign soil" thing in the first place, but it is an old right wing chestnut. By their definition, it seems, McCain and Gingrich are bordering on unpatriotic here. Though that's the least of the issues.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
16. "... a lot of really significant, monumental issues facing the global economy, but this supersedes
Thu Feb 20, 2014, 09:02 PM
Feb 2014

“There are a lot of really significant, monumental issues facing the global economy, but this supersedes them all.”

Cha

(296,846 posts)
19. GOOD ON Sen Whitehouse and Rep Waxman@!
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 06:36 AM
Feb 2014

McCain should feel real proud to lump himself in with newtie. Really just consider the source of those who are calling SOS Kerry delusional.

Mahalo kpete.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sen Whitehouse & Rep ...