Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 02:11 PM Feb 2014

MAP: These 7 Tiny Orange Splotches Are Responsible For A Quarter Of US GDP

We recently posted Reddit user Alexandr Trubetskoy's map showing that half of all U.S. GDP comes from just 23 metropolitan areas.

Trubetskoy went a step further and broke all American economic activity down into quartiles in this map:


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/map-us-gdp-quartile-concentration-2014-2

The metro areas of New York, Philadelphia, Washington, Chicago, Houston, Dallas, and Los Angeles account for 25% of US GDP.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MAP: These 7 Tiny Orange Splotches Are Responsible For A Quarter Of US GDP (Original Post) FarCenter Feb 2014 OP
Interesting, but what do we PRODUCE in the DC Metro area??? elleng Feb 2014 #1
Well, when congress is in session... temporary311 Feb 2014 #2
Right, so I guess that's why the gardens in and around DC look so good!!! elleng Feb 2014 #3
That's Virginia MrScorpio Feb 2014 #7
I said, 'In and around,' ya know! elleng Feb 2014 #12
I know MrScorpio Feb 2014 #13
And we miss you! elleng Feb 2014 #15
Gross Domestic Product is mainly a measure of consumption FarCenter Feb 2014 #4
A tremendous amount of help for the people seattledo Feb 2014 #8
seattledo, elleng Feb 2014 #14
IOW Urban megopoli with 24% of population have 25% of GDP???? HereSince1628 Feb 2014 #5
I get more like 21% of the population for the 7 MSAs FarCenter Feb 2014 #6
thanks, but 21% producing 25% doesn't sound so amazing hfojvt Feb 2014 #9
I think I ended up with 23.7% I think it doesn't change the point... HereSince1628 Feb 2014 #10
Around here I saw the Twin Cities, Madison and Milwaukee as big hubs outside Chicago CatholicEdHead Feb 2014 #11
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
4. Gross Domestic Product is mainly a measure of consumption
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 02:30 PM
Feb 2014
A fully equivalent definition is that GDP (Y) is the sum of final consumption expenditure (FCE), gross capital formation (GCF), and net exports (X – M).

Y = FCE + GCF+ (X − M)

FCE can then be further broken down by three sectors (households, governments and non-profit institutions serving households) and GCF by five sectors (non-financial corporations, financial corporations, households, governments and non-profit institutions serving households). The advantage of this second definition is that expenditure is systematically broken down, firstly, by type of final use (final consumption or capital formation) and, secondly, by sectors making the expenditure, whereas the first definition partly follows a mixed delimitation concept by type of final use and sector.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_domestic_product

elleng

(130,712 posts)
14. seattledo,
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 07:09 PM
Feb 2014

I lived in DC for 20+ years, worked for the Fed Govt, am now a Federal retiree living in MD. I surely appreciate what we 'bureaucrats' did for us all, but we 'produced' more paperwork than concrete stuff.

We surely consume a lot!

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
5. IOW Urban megopoli with 24% of population have 25% of GDP????
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 02:36 PM
Feb 2014

Frankly, that doesn't look remarkable at all.

Considering the manner in which Financial Industries HQ's are usually in urban areas and Financials make up such a large part of the economy...I'd say there is little evidence of greater per capita productivity for urban economies.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
9. thanks, but 21% producing 25% doesn't sound so amazing
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 04:30 PM
Feb 2014

not like 7 producing 25%

Back in 1989 I did a study of some midwestern states. I was kinda surprised that the population of the largest metro area was about 50% of the state population in almost all of the states.

That may be less true in larger states with multiple large cities.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
10. I think I ended up with 23.7% I think it doesn't change the point...
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 05:34 PM
Feb 2014

Sources of population estimates for these areas vary in what is incorporated and I think both your number and my number are close to each other...mine came from wiki estimates of metro-areas rather than MSAs.

But consider the largest parts of the economy, they mostly are concentrated in megopoli.

When you consider how concentrated Health Care is in the megopoli and it's 15% and 20% of the economy and it mines wealth from outlying areas.

Same thing is true for Financial/Investment.

Same thing for big Media, and professional sports.

And then there are the corporate/business HQ's.

(yes, you can point to exceptions for each part of the economy)

Then there is social investment that gives megopoli the enormous infrastructural/logistic advantages in productivity.

Considering all of it, the 4% superiority productivity over what might be expected if productivity was geographically uniform across the entire country isn't all that great.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MAP: These 7 Tiny Orange ...