Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An inconvenient contradiction (Original Post) Scuba Feb 2014 OP
A classic. jsr Feb 2014 #1
sick. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #2
Now, now, he still thinks it's safe... malthaussen Feb 2014 #3
of course the could be said of Ted Kennedy and wind power. littlewolf Feb 2014 #17
Have to admit, when I first heard that, way back when, it really pissed me off. pangaia Feb 2014 #26
Kennedy may have had very good reasons. The Cape Cod ecosystem is incredibly fragile. merrily Feb 2014 #37
Usually, it's older Republicans who post things like that. merrily Feb 2014 #36
the only reason I posted it. was people on both sides Dem and Rep littlewolf Feb 2014 #40
I guess you missed the points of my post. merrily Feb 2014 #41
that also is possible .... I will admit that I was really pissed when I first littlewolf Feb 2014 #42
Rest well. merrily Feb 2014 #43
The rich are not like you and I. sufrommich Feb 2014 #4
When I heard that laundry_queen Feb 2014 #5
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch.....nt Enthusiast Feb 2014 #6
That guy appears to be full of gas. JEB Feb 2014 #7
............. Curmudgeoness Feb 2014 #30
as long as you're up on the hill... BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #8
I wish they would put a well pad in his front yard SamKnause Feb 2014 #9
and make sure that his well 2naSalit Feb 2014 #23
My understanding is... tkmorris Feb 2014 #10
We are just plebs JJChambers Feb 2014 #11
These people are just despicable cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #12
He "objects to the 160-foot water tower planned next to his home ..." Auggie Feb 2014 #13
And he said bleedinglib Feb 2014 #14
And I thought I was good at keeping my work life and my home life separated. A Simple Game Feb 2014 #15
Your last paragraph poses some very interesting questions. Scuba Feb 2014 #16
I know, why is he doing it this way? Is he personally against fracking? A Simple Game Feb 2014 #21
maybe he knows that bringing this into the open, that airing the biggest and MisterP Feb 2014 #24
Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner. Scuba Feb 2014 #25
Sadly WI-ites are well familiar with this! hue Feb 2014 #28
Fracking towers are good enough for you fasttense Feb 2014 #18
Should have bought a bigger ranch .... MindMover Feb 2014 #19
Only little people have their views ruined Lifelong Protester Feb 2014 #20
He knows it could affect his water too... marions ghost Feb 2014 #45
More hypocrisy oldandhappy Feb 2014 #22
As usual it's all about me, myself & I!! hue Feb 2014 #27
The poster boy for hypocrisy. AAO Feb 2014 #29
I wonder what the basis for his suit is? You cant frack near the personal property of the rhett o rick Feb 2014 #31
The suit is over the devaluation of his property, a 5M ranch. toby jo Feb 2014 #32
Doesn't that beat all. pacalo Feb 2014 #33
, blkmusclmachine Feb 2014 #34
Mr. BIG 'Not in My Backyard' mrdmk Feb 2014 #35
Thinking no one Cha Feb 2014 #38
"I'm Chevy Chase...and you're not." merrily Feb 2014 #39
I can't stand jerks like this. It's class. Only the little people are suppose to experience this. Jasana Feb 2014 #44

littlewolf

(3,813 posts)
17. of course the could be said of Ted Kennedy and wind power.
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 02:14 PM
Feb 2014
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/29/science/earth/29wind.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0


Opponents said they would continue to fight construction of the farm, known as Cape Wind, which would sprawl across 25 square miles of Nantucket Sound.
In announcing the much-anticipated decision, Mr. Salazar hastened to add that he was requiring the developer, Cape Wind Associates, to take several steps to mitigate possibly adverse effects on the environment — including views from the Kennedy Compound National Historic Landmark, which overlooks Nantucket Sound. Those steps include adjusting the turbines’ color and configuration.


Opposition to the proposal from Senator Edward M. Kennedy, who died in August, had been a major thorn in the Obama administration’s side in advancing the project.


Senator Kennedy was in favor of wind power until it came to his location.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
37. Kennedy may have had very good reasons. The Cape Cod ecosystem is incredibly fragile.
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 04:54 AM
Feb 2014

Please see Reply 36 as well.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
36. Usually, it's older Republicans who post things like that.
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 04:49 AM
Feb 2014

Last edited Tue Feb 25, 2014, 05:23 AM - Edit history (2)

They have such a thing about the Kennedys, especially Ted, who had the nerve (in their eyes) to live past 60. Surprised to see it here, though, littlewolf. (First Nations, by any chance?)

As the article that you linked clearly states, a number of the objections raised by TK were addressed before the project got the go ahead. There was also the issue of privatizing public lands, to which Robert Kennedy, Jr. has objected, along with the potential for adverse long term impact on the local economy. And then, there is the general fragility of the Cape Cod ecosystem and the fact that no one could figure out why so many Cape residents, especially women, were getting cancer.


And a tiny, fragile spit of land, engorged with tourists from May to October, is very different from Texas and a lot of other places where a massive wind farm would have made a lot more sense than it would have made on Cape Cod.

Besides, Kennedy had not, for years, been doing, as to wind farms near other people's homes, what this guy had been doing as to fracking near other people's home. So, it's one false equivalency upon another false equivalency to compare Kennedy and a huge wind farm on the Cape with this Exxon guy and fracking in Texas, isn't it?

Republicans seem to specialize in false equivalencies and their kissing cousin, comparing apples and oranges. But, again, I'm surprise to see it here. And you can Write that Down.

littlewolf

(3,813 posts)
40. the only reason I posted it. was people on both sides Dem and Rep
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 08:52 AM
Feb 2014

are gonna do what they can to make life better for themselves.
I miss TK he was a champion, (not sure what he would make of ACA
but that is another kettle of fish.)

merrily

(45,251 posts)
41. I guess you missed the points of my post.
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 09:01 AM
Feb 2014

what you were trying to say about Ted was obvious. My point was that I think you could well be wrong about his motivation.

littlewolf

(3,813 posts)
42. that also is possible .... I will admit that I was really pissed when I first
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 09:18 AM
Feb 2014

learned of his position.

anyway, thank you for pointing out this different aspect of what may have been
his position. but I have been up for 14 hrs now. and I hear my bed calling my
name loudly, I must go answer it's call. good night.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
5. When I heard that
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 12:29 PM
Feb 2014

I thought the irony gods must be having the biggest laugh of their lives. WHAT in the fucking fuck? Fucking asshole.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
8. as long as you're up on the hill...
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 01:01 PM
Feb 2014

Who cares whats rolls down. Just so long as nothing rolls down on MEEEEEEEEE


Shove it, dude.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
10. My understanding is...
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 01:16 PM
Feb 2014

He doesn't give a damn about the fracking but rather objects to the giant water tower blocking his expensive views from his property. Have I got that wrong?

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
15. And I thought I was good at keeping my work life and my home life separated.
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 02:08 PM
Feb 2014

The conversations going on in this guys head must be fascinating.

Work Rex says this is a good place to build our tower for fracking.
Home Rex says that will block my view, has nothing at all to do with contaminating my farm's water supply, fracking is safe.
Work Rex says your view is a small price to pay for cheap energy.
Home Rex says, "Cheap, energy hasn't been cheap for 20 years, oh wait, I'm rich, who cares about the price. I'm going to sue! It's about the view... you know."
Work Rex says, "You can't sue over the view! How will it look? Besides you're suing me and I'm you."
Home Rex says, "I don't care who you are, it's about the water quality for my horses, but don't tell anyone. Let's just say it's about the view. As for the 'you being me' thing, my wife says she doesn't like the 'work' me anyway."

But why didn't he quietly behind the scene just get the tower moved? For a company of this size, I would think this would be a small thing. What good is being the CEO if you can't do something that small? As far as that goes I can't believe anyone allowed the tower to be spotted there in the first place, nobody in the company chain of command knew the bosses horse ranch was there?

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
21. I know, why is he doing it this way? Is he personally against fracking?
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 02:24 PM
Feb 2014

Are there no logistical alternatives? Then using his insider info, sell the farm and buy a different one.

Probably never learn the answers.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
24. maybe he knows that bringing this into the open, that airing the biggest and
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 03:55 PM
Feb 2014

most flagrant hypocrisy imaginable, won't matter one bit?

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
18. Fracking towers are good enough for you
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 02:18 PM
Feb 2014

but not for me. I'm special and don't like them. For you fraking is just fine, for me not so much.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
22. More hypocrisy
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 02:36 PM
Feb 2014

He does not have to look at it. I am in a senior mobile home park where someone complained about seeing a neighbor's trash can. Get a life. You do not have to look at the trash can. If you have 100 acres you do not have to look at a tower. Go pet your money.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
31. I wonder what the basis for his suit is? You cant frack near the personal property of the
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 09:09 PM
Feb 2014

wealthy.

 

toby jo

(1,269 posts)
32. The suit is over the devaluation of his property, a 5M ranch.
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 09:27 PM
Feb 2014

He is paid 40.3M by Exon, which is staying out of the suit.

The water tower is owned by another company, Cross Timber Water Supply Corp, which has set up operations on his road to supply water to all the frack sites. Sounds like they didn't make the connection, but surprised it wasn't moved.

It was on Think Progress today. [link:http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/02/21/3316881/exxon-ceo-protests-fracking/|

merrily

(45,251 posts)
39. "I'm Chevy Chase...and you're not."
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 05:17 AM
Feb 2014

The 1% have always believed themselves to be entitled to more and better and sooner than everyone else.

Jasana

(490 posts)
44. I can't stand jerks like this. It's class. Only the little people are suppose to experience this.
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 11:02 AM
Feb 2014

Ted Kennedy pulled a stunt like this. He was part of a lawsuit that blocked a wind farm in Nantucket Sound. The millionaires said the offshore wind farm would ruin their view of the ocean. They blocked this project for years. Thankfully (in this case) they lost.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»An inconvenient contradic...