Bennyboy, has bit the dust on DU

[boston bean]

Skinner finally gave the banhammer to one of the most, flamebaiting misogynists.

Good, and good riddance to him.

Reason:
Misogynist.

http://www.democraticunderground.com?com=profile&uid=204796&sub=trans

Real name:
DU Member for: 6 years, 8 months, 21 days
Posts: 10,440
Recommendations: 96
Star member: No

[TDale313]

1. Not sorry to see that, I must say.

[BainsBane]

2. I have to say he isn't on my list of the worst misogynists

But in posting that OP after Earl G had already locked another similar thread of his, he was certainly pressing his luck.

Oh, come to think of it, he did confess to coming onto DU to dump on women since he had no woman in his personal life he could dump on. Yeah, that was bad. I expect he isn't the only one who treats the site that way, but being so open about it wasn't bright.

[boston bean]

5. Oh, he was a misogynist, no doubt about it.

Bennyboy This message was hidden by Jury decision. Hide

350. it is absolutely hostile and why this will be my last post here ever.

Seriously, in the past two days I ahve seen the absolute worse from people I thought wre my allies. FUCK THEM. Bunchafuckingcrones.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4553678

So then, because I would really like to spit in the face of a couple of posters here (you know who you are), I thought some sarcasm was in order. I thought a funny story with my female friend (who is hot as hell) who photos golfers did a strip club tourney would do the trick. (I thought it was pretty funny) Well that was def flamebait, but again, so fucking what? That too (Once past my obvious sarcasm) could have become a discussion about how much my friend (who is hot as hell) has to make little compromises to do her job. Or how she (even though she is hot as hell) is fortunate enough to not have to become a stripper in order to support herself. Or how she works all day taking photos for a few bucks but the strippers get that stuffed in their G string every five minutes. Or how Walter Ioss is HER favorite photographer too and she thinks that being an SI photographer is THE DREAM JOB.

really I've been here a long time and we used to be able to discuss stuff. I know that I have added to it myself, sometimes, probably because I am not with a female partner now, and every once in a while I feel the need to piss someone (a woman or women usually) off, and I do it on DU. But look at my past posts and you wills ee that I seldom post int he sex wars thread. I'd much rather talk about important stuff but the posts die. The list of shit DU don't care about is getting longer everyday (see the TTP thread today for an example) and this board is becoming a one issue forum. (See the anti men threads today for example)


But it is so bad now, Coming to DU now is like having your Mom, your wife, you ex wife and your daughter telling you how to behave every minute.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024548058#post263

Oh sure there are plenty more, but he was one, no doubt about it. I'm glad as all fuck he is gone from this website.

[geek tragedy]

8. last line was actually the clincher for me.

the association of resentment with the women in his life

[TDale313]

11. Yeah, that was pretty telling.

[boston bean]

12. You know how many people were taken in with this

misogynistic POS. Defending, reccing him, giving him the high fives.

It's about fucking time he's gone. Enough of the games with womens lives on the line.

[geek tragedy]

15. truth nt

[Tuesday Afternoon]

42. He was a bigger, more successful troll than geek is giving credit for.

At least he did not serve on MIRt or in Host capacity. Thank god for that.

[geek tragedy]

51. oh I give him credit for being an extreme troll

i mean, he went from bashing every living Catholic as a 'criminal' due to the church's enabling of child abuse to praising the existence of child porn as proof of the 'democratic' nature of porn

that's determined trolling, violentacrenz style

[Tuesday Afternoon]

58. maybe, I meant to reply to Baines, given her first comment in this thread. Thanks

for clarifying. I mainly saw his vitriol in the Lounge. He likes The Grateful Dead and endeared himself to several Loungers in that regard.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

19. yep. I wish him well in real life and hope he gets the help he needs. There is some real pain in

that post and that attitude.

Go in Peace, bennyboy but, Go.

[Cali_Democrat]

38. Yes...it appears he does need some help

Kinda sad, actually.

[BainsBane]

9. Gotcha

I suppose the ones I notice most are those who come after me personally.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

22. ya think ...

wonder why is that, Baines

Now, do you understand where I am coming from.

[TDale313]

37. So much anger and hate.

Ugg.

[Arugula Latte]

56. Gee, I can't imagine why he's not currently with a "female partner" ...

[Sheldon Cooper]

77. ...

[cinnabonbon]

169. My thought exactly.

[geek tragedy]

17. here's a couple examples of his fine work:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024120165

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2377766

[Whisp]

21. ugh. That first link. Makes me want to vomit.

damn.

And if I understand correctly, admin would have seen this OP as every alert goes to them. And it took this friggen long to catch him on another one of his filth missions.

damn.

[geek tragedy]

23. puts his SI stuff into context nt

[boston bean]

26. That was frickin sick and why that didn't earn him the hammer

I guess we will never know... Child Porn????

[Whisp]

35. I'm sure BennyBoys' high fivers are really proud today for indirectly

supporting this kind of muck.

[TDale313]

73. Nah, his getting banned just reinforces their persecution complexes.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

115. yep.

I hope they are quaking in their little ole persecuted boots, too.

[pintobean]

134. Reading that post

he's just stating the existence of that shit, and that anyone can find it if they want it. He didn't say he watched it, or that anyone should, just that they can. I would assume that that's how admin saw it and that's why he wasn't canned over it. It wasn't a TOS violation.

It was certainly a creepy post, and a jury said it violated community standards. That kind of crap doesn't belong anywhere on this site.

[boston bean]

135. Are you skinner or earlg?

Cause you speak for them quite often.

[pintobean]

136. No. That's why I said I assume

I pay attention to what they do and say. There is plenty of information on this site that can give anyone a good idea of how they approach these things. I see a lot of shit-fits thrown by people who refuse to look at things the way they are, and insist things be how they want them to be.

What I see is a couple of guys trying to do the best they can. They're as fair and transparent as they can possibly be. They admit that they've made mistakes in the past, when it comes to banning people. It looks to me that they try not to repeat those mistakes. That means they have to give the benefit of the doubt when real doubt exists.

Here, they've shitcanned two guys that you wanted banned, but that's not good enough for you. You want more and it should have been sooner. Why don't you quit your whining and just enjoy the moment.

[sufrommich]

29. The second commenter in that OP

didn't seem to have a problem with it.

[CreekDog]

54. the second commenter finds more to criticize of liberals

than of the OP.

[sufrommich]

59. He/She isn't familiar to me,I guess I should

be grateful for that.

[CreekDog]

61. oh he's probably familiar to you

just the name isn't.

[RBStevens]

83. Yeah, that had me scratching my head.

wtf?

[loli phabay]

87. it was not agreement with his beliefs, more a statement of fact

Cant remember the numbers but porn of all types is a large part of the intetnet.

[RBStevens]

88. I see. Thanks for that.

That's the way I took it but you never know sometimes.

[BainsBane]

92. First impressions are often correct

Keep that in mind.

[JI7]

163. and when you take into account the history of posts

[Tuesday Afternoon]

95. those two replies ...

obviously in agreement and still posting ...especially that first one because one of my hides is for saying those exact words.

[JI7]

161. the child porn one should have got him banned right away

[Jesus Malverde]

178. sad

[liberal N proud]

3. How do you make it that long on this site without being exposed?

We are pretty good at smoking them out here, how did this one slip through?

[geek tragedy]

6. he's been exposed for a while.

more of a question of no longer being tolerated.

[Whisp]

7. Probably an Event Horizon in his eyes

when admin (which are guys) were not exactly agreeing with good ole Benny. Maybe he felt betrayed and let slip who he is too far.

[Whisp]

4. I am glad he is gone but

I also hope he sheds some of that hate and angst towards women. He is a very angry and sad fellow that needs some help.

[sufrommich]

14. I agree. nt

[Laelth]

28. I doubt this banning will help. If anything, he'll be angrier than ever. n/t

-Laelth

[sufrommich]

31. That's a frightening thought. nt

[Laelth]

33. Quite. n/t

-Laelth

[WilliamPitt]

10. Addition by subtraction.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

99. Quality not Quantity. n/t

[Hatchling]

13. I thought he already was.

I think he's been on my ignore list a long time.

Put a few more on it today.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

16. I hate to grave dance, usually. But, truly -GOOD RIDDANCE TO THAT POS.-

[hlthe2b]

18. Given his admission that when in a bad mood, he came here to "piss off the women...."

I can not say he'll be missed.

[geek tragedy]

20. he praised the existence of child and snuff porn, called it 'democratic'

that after labeling every Roman Catholic on planet earth a 'criminal' for the abuses committed by the church.

not a very coherent troll

[hlthe2b]

24. I'm glad I missed that, at least..

[Whisp]

25. that porn and snuff post was back in early December... wtf

like W.T.F.! why was he allowed to slither his slime here for so long after?

[Tuesday Afternoon]

45. He is not the only one.

and there were women agreeing with it because 1A ... Free Speech.

[Whisp]

50. using Free Speech as a pathetic excuse for that

is Exactly what the lameass knuckledragging baggers and Ron Paulers do.

We have been contaminated.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

52. yep.

[VanillaRhapsody]

154. dumb enough not to understand that "Freedom of Speech" is about government interference...

and that is all...

[Electric Monk]

74. links?

I think his point about Papists is dealt with quite well by this Tim Minchin song, fwiw.

I didn't see any posts from him about child porn that I remember, so I guess I'll just have to take your word on that.

[geek tragedy]

75. links

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4556655

[Electric Monk]

78. Ok, that was some weird shit for him to post. Thanks for the links. nt

[Squinch]

147. I'm worried for his dog. Who will he kick now?

[hlthe2b]

148. exactly... n/t

[hrmjustin]

27. Just saw. He went way over the line and I understand the ppr but I wish him well for the future.

[boston bean]

30. I don't wish people who think child porn is part of democracy, well.

But hey, maybe it's me that's not the nice person.

Good fuckin riddance to that slime ball. I don't wish people like that well.

I don't wish them harm, but I don't wish them well either.

[hrmjustin]

34. Well you know I am being nice.

[boston bean]

36. Sometimes, nice isn't nice.

I like you and I find you to be a great person, but really, it doesn't make anyone a bad person who doesn't wish that slimeball a not nice person.

[hrmjustin]

41. I agree he was going off the rails and he got what he deserved.

His last post about spitting on people here was the last straw and he got the ppr.

I have to say I did not read all he wrote so I will defer to your judgement on him.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

49. I understand what you are saying but, now that he can no longer harass people on this site

I can be gracious and wish him to get the help that he so obviously needs. There are others posting that I would do the same for and will as soon as they get their PPR.

I am tired of these types making DU suck and they are doing it all over DU.

As a person, I wish them well but, while they are so obviously sick and contagious .... they are spreading this illness all over DU and I am tired of watching it.

[boston bean]

82. I don't consider myself an ungracious person.

And I really don't wish him well. I don't have any wishes for him, good or bad.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

86. I understand. I too, am just glad he is gone.

[Solly Mack]

32. Shame we can't warn other women that he'll now go after them when...

"I feel the need to piss someone (a woman or women usually) off"

You know, because he's - shockingly(Snort) - without female company and no doubt will blame women for his ban. And he'll want to take it out on someone instead of examining his own actions.

[Whisp]

39. Yes, he could very well take it out on an unsuspecting woman

I think he is That sick.

jesus.
At first I felt a bit of sympathy for the ignoramus, but now I feel for the danger he could be to others in his rl path.

[Solly Mack]

48. Hopefully, he confines his behavior to behind a keyboard.

But you never really know.

[TDale313]

57. Yeah, someone with that much hate

could very well be dangerous. His attitude, quite frankly, is just toxic.

[MindMover]

40. He just goes to the library and starts another account or just moves over to the next computer ...

I really do not understand how this will ban him or any like him ... ?

[TygrBright]

62. Actually, DU's got a decent track record ID'ing & zotzing zombies.

Granted, there's no way to get them all, but in general, the Admins & MIRteam are quite good at spotting patterns and nailing zombies.

Anyone remember "Library Girl?"

It's possible, it just requires effort and commitment. An a willingness to give them rope.

The Hammer of PPR is always in the green room.

reassuringly,
Bright

[greatauntoftriplets]

64. Library Girl has been banned twice already today.

And probably 16 or more times over the weekend. I lost count.

[TygrBright]

65. Points for persistence! But yeah, case in point. ::waves howdy:: n/t

[greatauntoftriplets]

66. That's one word for it!

[hrmjustin]

67. She never says hello anymore to me.

[greatauntoftriplets]

69. Maybe we get her too fast.

[hrmjustin]

70. Ah thats ok. I am glad you guys get her fast.

[greatauntoftriplets]

72. Same here.

[Paulie]

158. Me neither.

My conversation with Her in a thread over three accounts was interesting though.

[Ohio Joe]

43. Good one - nt

[NuclearDem]

44. Reason: Misogynist.

Could've told anyone that after the Margaret Thatcher fuck doll thread.

[boston bean]

46. Oh, you got a link for that one?

I do recall something. But it's amazing to me someone like this lasts as long here as they do. Something is wrong.

Is it that women's/feminists/allies voices are not taken into consideration?

[liberalhistorian]

160. Well, when you have a well-established poster

who claims that child support is "male enslavement" and who responds to every thread dealing with violence against women with questions asking why anyone doesn't care about violence against men, and when there are a lot on here (too many) who agree with that, and when they harass women posters who try to counter their bullshit, then it's not a stretch to consider that maybe women's voices aren't taken seriously enough.

[Squinch]

170. Seriously. He was pretty bad, but there are plenty more who are as bad or worse.

[liberalhistorian]

174. Very true. Unfortunately, they know

just how to play the game, how to dial it back enough, and stay just within the boundaries of the guidelines, to avoid being served as pizza for the evening.

[LeftishBrit]

117. Yikes, I remember that!

My view was: have sexual fantasies all you want, but please do not post them all over DU, especially not if they've got Thatcher in them!

[Iggo]

47. I guess I can take him off ignore now?

[1awake]

53. After reading your post I was upset

That someone would feel such joy of someone getting band. After reading some of his posts... nevermind.

[shenmue]

55. Yay

Good riddance.

[CreekDog]

60. "polite" bigots tend to last a while

have to sound restrained in your bigotry.

start letting it all hang out then you get banned.

look at Cid B. he was calling gays abnormal, making fun of kids beat up by bullies, constantly saying he was afraid to shower with gay people, etc. but those things didn't get him banned.

[laundry_queen]

93. Yep, plenty of 'polite' ones left

the kind who are all "who ME? why, I was just asking a question! Why are you making assumptions about what I'm saying? why are you attacking me? I'm just trying to have a conversation."
These days it takes a lot to get banned.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

100. yeah, the innocent "who me" victim tactic. ugh.

no, I am not attacking anyone. I am telling the truth and the truth is hurting you and you want to kill the messenger (me) for telling you the truth.

yeah.

Truth.

[Squinch]

146. Way, way, way, way, way too true.

[seaglass]

63. Sorry that this is a bit off-topic but what is that Recommendations number under number of posts?

Curious - I'm not seeing it anywhere.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

102. you can see a person recommendations history under their profile.

it can be quite revealing to see who recs what.

[seaglass]

103. OK I must be blind because I can't see a number like that anywhere in mine. n/t

[Tuesday Afternoon]

106. you are right. I can see your rec history

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=120727&sub=recs

but, I don't see the number of recs on your profile.

interesting.

[seaglass]

107. Do you have a number in yours? n/t

[Tuesday Afternoon]

108. No, I do not. I wonder if that number is generated at time of PPR and included in the PPR notice.

[seaglass]

109. Yeah I was wondering that or if it is a number of how many recs Bennyboy has received on his posts.

It just stood out to me because I only saw 3 threads that he rec'd in 90 days.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

110. I really don't know if it is His History of Total Recs or is it The Total recs his OPs have received

Interesting question for ATA, I think.

[boston bean]

111. If you click on his profile, you can view all the threads he rec'd

I believe that is what it is in reference to.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

113. I think so, too. but, seaglass made a good observation and poses an interesting question.

Especially since Rec History only goes back for 90 days.

[RBStevens]

68. Men like him are frightening and

and I formed that opinion based solely on the *dumping on DU women* post. After having read those two others posted in this thread I see that I was not wrong to think so.

At least he's not here anymore. Feel sorry for the IRL world.

[Pretzel_Warrior]

71. finally. that guy has had a string of outrageous posts for months that I've been following him

I know I alerted a few.

[Electric Monk]

79. and you've been banned how many times so far?

You've got chutzpah, I'll give you that.

[Whisp]

81. PW had a post hidden for saying 'Debby Downer'

and that sent him to pasture for a while.

Who the chutzpah belongs to might be you - comparing what PW said/says and what this banned creature from the dark abyss of bennyboy hells of woman hate said many times over.

[Pretzel_Warrior]

85. electric monk doesn't like me because I provide credible pushback to Obama hate on DU

[Electric Monk]

89. You are entitled to your own opinions, of course. Sometimes we agree, sometimes we don't.

Whether your opinion has anything do do with reality is entirely up to you.

[Pretzel_Warrior]

84. once. fully admitted to. full context in my journal

I have nothing to hide.

[Sheldon Cooper]

76. Well color me surprised.

Toodle ooo, Benny! :mwah:

[Pretzel_Warrior]

98. I wonder who is next

I have my guesses

[Tuesday Afternoon]

101. lol

PM me and we can compare notes and make bets

[AverageJoe90]

80. Yeah, it does seem like he had some issues.

The one thing that got to me is his rather casual mentions of child porno of all things. Now that was a little disturbing.....

[treestar]

90. When he admitted he was on DU to annoy some women

Due to his female relatives bugging him and his not getting laid right now, it was just a matter of time.

[liberalhistorian]

162. Gee, I just can't imagine why he was having

trouble getting laid. Nope, just can't even begin to think of a reason why.

[Tom Ripley]

91. I thought he just had bad musical taste, and was surprised when he revealed himself to be such a pig

[Tuesday Afternoon]

104. ... lol ...

He loved him some Grateful Dead, he did.

[Warren DeMontague]

137. You know, there is a great deal of overlap...

between Deadheads and Moody Blues fans.

Just sayin.

[cui bono]

94. Good. I just saw that immature flaimbait post of his that withstood a (clueless) jury.

Wow, some of the posts linked to are unbelievable. No place for that shit on DU.

Hope more get the boot.

[tammywammy]

96. Good. n/t

[PasadenaTrudy]

97. Thank you, Jaysus! n/t

[Sarah Ibarruri]

105. A blessed day indeed. nt

[alcibiades_mystery]

112. Good. His behavior was aggressive and ridiculous.

[Zorra]

114. Sad.

It seems I've forgotten how to mambo.

[Comrade Grumpy]

116. Bennyboy may have made DU suck, but so does this gloating.

The self-congratulatory mob mentality is unseemly, and the calls for "who is next" are downright creepy. Let the purges begin.

[pintobean]

118. It can be therapeutic

and relieve some of the tensions on the board. The guy was an asshole and went out of his way to piss a lot of people off. One of his last posts was pretty disgusting.

I agree with you on the "who is next" part, though. It's witch hunt mentality.

[LanternWaste]

123. I'd say his postings about child porn are what's creepy and unseemly.

How precisely does a post about a banned member who posted about child pornography equate to unseemly?

[geek tragedy]

126. public executions have little deterrent effect unless they're public

at least two seething misogynistic bigots have been shown the door today, perhaps a message that being a seething misogynistic bigot can get one banned will help community standards here

and no that is not a reference to anyone, just the general community acceptance of misogyny in jury voting

[hfojvt]

140. well in some ways it lets people know

whether friends or enemies.

Benny does not seem to have any of the former. That would make me sad, and it does show that he was not making a positive contribution.

My own reaction was "who?" Six years and 10,000+ posts and I cannot ever remember interacting with him one way or the other. Doesn't mean I never did, only that I don't remember it. It's a big group sometimes.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

144. He hung out in the lounge a lot. Built up post count there and has allies because of it.

The lounge has been to misogyny as cooking and baking has been to the cave.

[JI7]

166. purge ? mob mentality ? bennyboy was probably a sexual predator and he defended child porn

fuck him and anyone who supports him in any way.

[Squinch]

171. I'm guessing you've never read the conversations that take place when seabeyond

gets sent to detention. You want to see an unseemly self-congratulatory mob mentality, check out that noise.

And she's basically just a good person who has strong opinions. Never wished harm on anyone like our friend Bennyboy. Also sea speaks AGAINST child pornography, as opposed to Bennyboy, who speaks FOR it.

Color me unseemly.

[loli phabay]

173. first time ive agreed with you, dont always agree with sea but i respect her.

[LanternWaste]

119. His was obvious. That it took this long to ban him is rather frustrating.

His was obvious. That it took this long to ban him is rather frustrating.

It bodes well for the less-obvious misogynists, hacks, and other predators who play the system, play the fool, and then play the victim-- pretty much in that order.

[boston bean]

120. Soundman just got the axe too.

Reason:
Sexist troll.

http://www.democraticunderground.com?com=profile&uid=293259&sub=trans

Real name:
DU Member for: 1 years, 4 months, 10 days
Posts: 297
Recommendations: 40
Star member: Yes

[geek tragedy]

121. he was even worse, an obvious woman-hating misogynist if one ever lived

Remember when I wrote that one should assume 2 juror votes to keep misogyny?

The post that got him banned as a 'sexist troll' was 4-2 to hide.

[boston bean]

122. Some leading from the top from admin

might, get this shit off the board. I mean it's not like there isn't evidence of this crap, all over the place.

Reading in ATA, makes it seem that if a jury doesn't hide it, it's ok for sexist/misogynistic bullshit to be posted here.

Am I wrong?? Maybe, I'm just misreading it.

[geek tragedy]

124. interesting that skinner has alerted on posts, only to have juries vote to keep them.

there seems to be a lot of "don't hide anything on substance" that goes on.

[Gormy Cuss]

125. You can just put the posters on ignore.

Problem solved.

[boston bean]

127. You know... I don't understand what

appears to be the willful disregard for members who pay to post here, provide clicks, content.

This isn't reddit. It's not 4chan.

We are suppose to have some say and yet there is very little oppressed groups get to say or do anything about.

Of course, DU is going to be ripe for misogynistic bullshit. Look all over the web.

The answer is almost always, use ignore or trash. Well excuse any one of us liberals who have a really hard time supporting misogynistic bullshit and care about this website and a safe place for all, and don't want to put our head in the sand and unknowingly support it with silence.

I don't freakin get it.

[Gormy Cuss]

131. I'd ask admin about it

but my last question went unanswered. Lesson learned.

I no longer participate in juries and I don't alert. What's the point, when even by admin's admissions a lot of posts are left standing that could legitimately be hidden? It's a crap shoot.

[boston bean]

132. I noticed many questions go unanswered

I don't know what they say, but I have noticed quite a few that are posted by feminists that go unanswered.

[DURHAM D]

133. I reviewed it just today -

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12565203

Title: Is this the best place to propose an amendment to the TOS?

Message: The lack of an explicit reference to sexism is apparently interpreted by some DUers as a sign that it's not prohibited.

202 responses and 61 Recs

[Vashta Nerada]

139. So, if I'm reading your post correctly...

you should be able to get whatever you want because you pay to post here?

Um, the only privileges you get when you buy your star is the green check marks here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/star

Want to post whatever you want, ban whoever you want, and do whatever you want? Make your own website. Right?

[boston bean]

141. No. People who don't pay for a star, click and give content.

So, no, you are wrong in your implications.

[PasadenaTrudy]

143. I'm not going to pay anymore.

Starting next month. After all this gender nonsense, I was wondering why throw money into it?

[Squinch]

150. I let my star expire.

Just can't justify putting money into something that disseminates that kind of crap, making it available for an ever increasing audience, making it seem ever more "normal."

[PasadenaTrudy]

168. Exactly.

I wish more women would do this in protest here.

[mindfulNJ]

175. I'm done too

I've paid for my last star unless things change significantly.

[DURHAM D]

129. DU does not have a zero tolerance policy for sexism and misogyny.

It is not prohibited in the language of the TOS on DU3.

I don't know why skinner and EarlG have each PPRed a sexist troll and a misogynist. I doubt it is coordinated given that it is not against the rules.

Also, if you like chopped salad there is some in ATA.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

142. good. n/t

[JI7]

165. soundman is the one who complained about women "sleeping around" and how he wont feel bad

for them if they are raped.

[Tommy_Carcetti]

128. I got one of my few hides because of him.

I rattled off a certain choice phrase to him after he insinuated that all Catholics were culpable of child sex abuse simply for being Catholic.

I understand the hide. But I didn't regret it.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

145. I know what you mean, Tommy. I know what you mean.

[La Lioness Priyanka]

130. good riddance. nt

[idendoit]

138. One obnoxious yahoo down.

Dozens to go.

[Rowdyboy]

149. A good start....

The garbage men need to come to work a little more often though. Seeing people get away with outrageous behavior only leads others to more outrageous behavior and the jury system has degenerated into a bad joke.

[CountAllVotes]

151. Thanks for letting me know

I have removed him from my IGNORE list where he has been for quite a long time now.

He offended me greatly more than once.

Good riddance!!

& recommend.

[GP6971]

152. I won't say goodbye

and good luck in the future.

[Starry Messenger]

153. And Soundman too.

A tiny bit of peace anyway. For now.

[DonCoquixote]

155. I hate to grave dance

But the fact these guys stuck around for so long says a lot. Say something that pleases the angry males, and the defenders come around, whereas certain people are outright stalked by people who say "one more jury hide and she is banned!"

[Tuesday Afternoon]

157. yep.

But, it is not OK to speculate when/where/how the rest of this ilk are banned. god forbid. The double standard is mind boggling.

[L0oniX]

156. Another one to remove from my ignore dungeon.

[liberalhistorian]

159. Maybe he can join Pab

on that Faux-DU FB site and they can both sing the "Misandry Blues", whining all day long about how DU is rife with "misandry" and no one cares 'cause the women folk are taking over everything.

Good riddance and so long, trash. Too bad he couldn't have taken some of the other misogynistic misandry-obsessed DUers with him.

[Matariki]

164. Long time coming.

Thanks Skinner.

[idendoit]

167. Wow, how many more of these in-house trolls are there?

[Squinch]

172. I bet we could each name a few.

[Jesus Malverde]

176. Where does one see the recommendation number on a profile...

or is that a host feature?

[William769]

177. Took long enough. nt