Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 07:03 PM Feb 2014

Federal wood burning rule prompts rural backlash

Federal wood burning rule prompts rural backlash

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — A federal proposal to clean up the smoke wafting from wood-burning stoves has sparked a backlash from some rural residents, lawmakers and manufacturers who fear it could close the damper on one of the oldest ways of warming homes on cold winter days.

******

And they say humans are an intelligent species...
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

30cal

(99 posts)
2. It's an attack on the blue collar working class
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 07:25 PM
Feb 2014

It's pretty damn easy to rule from a perch.

Not one of those people proposing this law go to work and struggle to pay
a gas or oil bill.

And yeah I'm one of those that struggle to make ends meet.
My stove is the only thing that keeps my house warm all winter.
I couldn't afford to heat my house with oil


REP

(21,691 posts)
4. In California, no-burn days don't apply if burning wood is only source of heat
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 07:34 PM
Feb 2014

I don't know if this provision is in the Federal proposal, but it should be. Up where I live, many houses are heated by only woodstove or fireplace.

ladyVet

(1,587 posts)
6. Yeah, more crap to pile on poor people, while BP gets away with spilling oil willy-nilly.
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 09:03 PM
Feb 2014

I'm all for environmental controls, and cleaning this planet up. But let's look at the big offenders and get them in line before we worry about people heating with wood.

When I was a kid, we lived in a house once that only had a fireplace for heat. We ran out of coal one winter, and we scrounged for anything that would burn. I remember taking a bucket and going along the railroad tracks behind the house, gathering the coal that fell off the trains. It's a lot better to be warm.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
3. With propane at $6.00+ a gallon I can see their point
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 07:29 PM
Feb 2014

Lots of rural communities have propane heat and as propane has soared in price lately it has become necessary to burn wood to keep from freezing to death in this unusually cold winter.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
5. I've known families who lived on large plots of land.
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 08:13 PM
Feb 2014

They sustainably used wood from their plot to heat their house for 30 years, with the wife's mother and father using the same plot for the 30 years before that.

From their viewpoint, the fuel bill isn't "$6.00 per unit" of propane versus electricity or natural gas. It's $0/unit versus something more than that.

They also grew most of their own non-staple food, as well as chickens and sheep and the occasional cow and goat. Wheat, rice, pasta, oil, aluminum foil, even milk and cheese they bought.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal wood burning rule...