Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 10:35 AM Feb 2014

"Privacy is becoming a luxury good" -- Dragnet Nation

This book "Dragnet Nation" comes out today, according to NPR. Anybody catch the spot on "Fresh Air"? One of the author's most disturbing assessments is that to protect yourself from invasion of privacy will cost serious money to the point of being a luxury. And even then, you're still on somebody's radar screen. We need new laws.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2014/02/24/282061990/if-you-think-youre-anonymous-online-think-again

University of Chicago review this week:

Julia Angwin, AB'92
Author

From the publisher:"An inside look at who’s watching you, what they know and why it matters. We are being watched. We see online ads from websites we’ve visited, long after we’ve moved on to other interests. Our smartphones and cars transmit our location, enabling us to know what’s in the neighborhood but also enabling others to track us. And the federal government, we recently learned, has been conducting a massive data-gathering surveillance operation across the Internet and on our phone lines. In Dragnet Nation, award-winning investigative journalist Julia Angwin reports from the front lines of America’s surveillance economy, offering a revelatory and unsettling look at how the government, private companies, and even criminals use technology to indiscriminately sweep up vast amounts of our personal data. In a world where we can be watched in our own homes, where we can no longer keep secrets, and where we can be impersonated, financially manipulated, or even placed in a police lineup, Angwin argues that the greatest long-term danger is that we start to internalize the surveillance and censor our words and thoughts, until we lose the very freedom that makes us unique individuals. Appalled at such a prospect, Angwin conducts a series of experiments to try to protect herself, ranging from quitting Google to carrying a “burner” phone, showing how difficult it is for an average citizen to resist the dragnets’ reach. Her book is a cautionary tale for all of us, with profound implications for our values, our society, and our very selves."



Excerpt:

"On what data brokers "know"

"I found out there are a lot of data brokers out there. It took me almost a month to compile a list, because there's no real list of who they all are, and I was able to identify about 200 or so of them. Of those, very few were willing to let me see my data. It was about a dozen that would let me see my data: some of the bigger brokers, LexisNexis, Axium, and some very small outfits. ...

What was shocking about it was that it ranged from incredibly precise — every single address I'd ever lived at including the number on my dorm room in college, which I couldn't even remember ... to very imprecise, inaccurate things ... that were not at all true — that I was a single mother ... with no college education living in a place I didn't live.

We've learned from [Edward] Snowden, for instance, that the NSA is getting data from Google and Facebook and Yahoo and all the big companies that are out there, and in fact, even from things that I wouldn't have thought were worth our time — like information that flows between an app you're playing like Angry Birds and an advertiser that might be trying to advertise within that app. And so we have seen that these commercial databases have so much data and [are] so granular and so enticing to the government that they come in either way."

http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2014/02/24/282061990/if-you-think-youre-anonymous-online-think-again

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Privacy is becoming a luxury good" -- Dragnet Nation (Original Post) marions ghost Feb 2014 OP
Who's Julia Angwin? marions ghost Feb 2014 #1
Thanks for the recommendation. I'll check it out. Pholus Feb 2014 #2
I thought so too marions ghost Feb 2014 #3
Another interview: marions ghost Feb 2014 #4
Missed it, thanks for posting this. redqueen Feb 2014 #5
Sure marions ghost Feb 2014 #6
FYI K&R marions ghost Feb 2014 #7
Wednesday marions ghost Feb 2014 #8
RE Cellphone Data Spying marions ghost Feb 2014 #9

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
1. Who's Julia Angwin?
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 11:34 AM
Feb 2014

Here's the author giving a talk about her research. It's over an hour long, but contains much background and insights into her work:

http://vimeo.com/86441882

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
3. I thought so too
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 12:59 PM
Feb 2014

Last edited Tue Feb 25, 2014, 01:46 PM - Edit history (1)

As the author says on the video I posted, she doesn't advocate the position of hopelessness or want to promote ostrich behavior (ie. "privacy is dead, get over it&quot -- she addresses the issues head on.

Angwin suggests identifying all the sensitive areas that we wish to protect--children's data, health data, financial data, political data (right now your voting records are accessible to anyone), etc. --and calls for specific legal protections on these databases. Also protections against certain data about consumer habits going to (for example) car dealers who are able to scan your financial and buying data before you get to the lot and limit your negotiating leverage. She talks about the police-only tool called Stingray, a hand-held device currently in use via cell phone technology--which can collect all data about you from outside your house.

She also recommends encryption and use of services such as Duck Duck Go (search), Disconnect, Tor (browser), and anti-tracking tools. She cautions however that these are only stopgap.

This woman is looking at all this fearlessly. Most of us (including me) have a lot of fear about our surveillance state. Angwin, like Snowden, is raising the alarm. After The Booshcheney era, do we really trust the corporatocracy? And yet, like Angwin says, we all want the tech goodies (including her). She's very real about this dilemma that touches all of us in some way.

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
9. RE Cellphone Data Spying
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 12:38 PM
Feb 2014

So I looked up this Stingray system used by the police and found this fairly recent article:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/08/cellphone-data-spying-nsa-police/3902809/

• About one in four law-enforcement agencies have used a tactic known as a "tower dump," which gives police data about the identity, activity and location of any phone that connects to the targeted cellphone towers over a set span of time, usually an hour or two. A typical dump covers multiple towers, and wireless providers, and can net information from thousands of phones.

MORE: Examples of data-gathering abuses

MORE: Cell data dumps: A legally fuzzy area

INVESTIGATION: How we did it

• At least 25 police departments own a Stingray, a suitcase-size device that costs as much as $400,000 and acts as a fake cell tower. The system, typically installed in a vehicle so it can be moved into any neighborhood, tricks all nearby phones into connecting to it and feeding data to police. In some states, the devices are available to any local police department via state surveillance units. The federal government funds most of the purchases, via anti-terror grants.

• Thirty-six more police agencies refused to say whether they've used either tactic. Most denied public records requests, arguing that criminals or terrorists could use the information to thwart important crime-fighting and surveillance techniques.

Police maintain that cellphone data can help solve crimes, track fugitives or abducted children or even foil a terror attack.

Organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union and Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) say the swelling ability by even small-town police departments to easily and quickly obtain large amounts of cellphone data raises questions about the erosion of people's privacy as well as their Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Privacy is becoming...