Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 04:25 PM Feb 2014

Michelle Obama Expands Program That Gives All Students Free Meals

Michelle Obama Expands Program That Gives All Students Free Meals

By Bryce Covert

On Tuesday, First Lady Michelle Obama and U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack will announce the expansion of a pilot program that gives all students, regardless of income, free school meals, including breakfast and lunch.

The original program targeted students in 11 states, but as of July 1, it will be expanded to 22,000 schools across the country where 40 percent or more of the students are eligible for free or reduced-price lunches, a sign of a high concentration of poverty. The administration says this will reach 9 million children and help them “eat health meals at school, especially breakfast, which can have profound impacts on educational achievement.”

Programs that give all students free meals come with a variety of benefits. It eliminates the stigma children on free or reduced-price meals can experience, particularly when schools throw out their lunches and stamp their hands when their balances run low.

It can also save schools and parents a big headache when it comes to paperwork. Just half of the students who are eligible for free breakfast actually receive it, perhaps due to complications with getting enrolled. And in Boston, where the school district made all students eligible for free meals, there had previously been many families who fell just outside the income limits for the free meal program and are now able to participate.

- more -

http://thinkprogress.org/education/2014/02/25/3329241/michelle-obama-school-meals/


39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michelle Obama Expands Program That Gives All Students Free Meals (Original Post) ProSense Feb 2014 OP
K&R Tarheel_Dem Feb 2014 #1
I have always said this is the best option yeoman6987 Feb 2014 #3
Great idea. Let's just bypass the creeps who want MineralMan Feb 2014 #2
That money could have been spent on bullets and stuff! AgingAmerican Feb 2014 #4
Heartbreaking, isn't it ? nt eppur_se_muova Feb 2014 #11
That is wonderful! ananda Feb 2014 #5
More redistribution of wealth!!11! progressoid Feb 2014 #6
Thanks Michelle Obama! Cha Feb 2014 #7
Beat me to it! Thanks Michelle! freshwest Feb 2014 #9
You all beat me to it! I was working ;( sheshe2 Feb 2014 #27
Feed the children ProSense Feb 2014 #23
Good deal. HappyMe Feb 2014 #8
What Will "They" Say??? grilled onions Feb 2014 #10
They will say: "See, the Obamas are more interested in feeding people than in a strong military...." Moonwalk Feb 2014 #18
Sounds about right. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #24
And even better expansion would be to provide glowing Feb 2014 #12
Really like this idea Politicub Feb 2014 #20
Being Canadian, this doesn't apply, but I only have one issue with this OnlinePoker Feb 2014 #13
our First Lady is pretty savvy about nutrition. Voice for Peace Feb 2014 #26
I support this... awoke_in_2003 Feb 2014 #14
Excellent. tammywammy Feb 2014 #15
Works for me and I don't have kids. Behind the Aegis Feb 2014 #16
That should help in Salt Lake, where we apparently throw out food of kids who can't afford it. Drunken Irishman Feb 2014 #17
It's like a Victorian novel....nt msanthrope Feb 2014 #21
^^ this Politicub Feb 2014 #19
Great but please don't let Sodexo run it..... Sienna86 Feb 2014 #22
That's awesome. K&R Number23 Feb 2014 #25
REPORT: Child Hunger Is Concentrated In Rural America sheshe2 Feb 2014 #28
Thanks for posting. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #30
K&R Coyotl Feb 2014 #29
K&R ReRe Feb 2014 #31
I hope its implementation is well monitored. I hope achievement scores are correlated. ancianita Feb 2014 #32
a real pet subject of mine. mopinko Feb 2014 #35
Absolutely.And at the high school level, kids also need lots of bright, creative vegetarian dishes. ancianita Feb 2014 #37
Absolutely the decent, moral and compassionate thing to do. Jackpine Radical Feb 2014 #33
i absolutely support this. teachers do not need to know family income. mopinko Feb 2014 #34
Conservatives have a big problem with removing the 'stigma' hungry children face DebJ Feb 2014 #36
Kick! n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #38
Federal Government Expands Access To Healthy Food For Low-Income Moms And Babies ProSense Feb 2014 #39
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
3. I have always said this is the best option
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 04:36 PM
Feb 2014

I think it is horrible to have a student have to wear the "free lunch" sign. School is hard enough without having fellow students know your family's business. I am glad that this is happening. Thank you Michelle!

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
2. Great idea. Let's just bypass the creeps who want
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 04:34 PM
Feb 2014

to shame poor people and feed everyone exactly the same.

grilled onions

(1,957 posts)
10. What Will "They" Say???
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 05:17 PM
Feb 2014

Will they be afraid that once low income kids actually have full tummies that their grades might improve, improve enough that one day they may give them a run for their money?????

Moonwalk

(2,322 posts)
18. They will say: "See, the Obamas are more interested in feeding people than in a strong military...."
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 06:10 PM
Feb 2014

Read that as: the Obamas are more interested in feeding lazy people who don't want to work using our tax dollars rather than using those tax dollars to protect and defend us

That is what "they" will say.

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
12. And even better expansion would be to provide
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 05:46 PM
Feb 2014

to go bags for the end of the day with a sandwhich, fruit, carrot sticks, and a juice box... At least the kids have a snack/ dinner of some sort for the evening.

Just take them around to te classrooms on a cart and hand over as many as the teacher requested... Not everyone is going to take, but I would think the kids who have after school clubs, sports, and poor would take a bag for after school.

OnlinePoker

(5,719 posts)
13. Being Canadian, this doesn't apply, but I only have one issue with this
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 05:55 PM
Feb 2014

If I want to feed my kid breakfast and send them to school with a lunch of my own choosing, that should still be allowed. I've read of some jurisdictions where this is banned (at least the lunch portion).

For example:
http://www.medicaldaily.com/school-bans-homemade-lunches-angering-parents-critical-federal-nutritional-standards-263026

I know Jamie Oliver focused on the issue of school meals and how unhealthy they actually were in his Food Revolution a couple of years ago(very little fresh food...a lot of processed products like chicken nuggets and fries being served). I think a lot of these programs, while good intentioned are pushed by the industrial food companies and big-agra to get more of their product served.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
26. our First Lady is pretty savvy about nutrition.
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 11:43 PM
Feb 2014

Hopefully she won't stand behind a program that feeds
kid garbage.

Such a simple elegant and humane program.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
14. I support this...
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 05:57 PM
Feb 2014

and am willing to pay more in taxes to see it happen. When I was growing up, I was on the free lunch program. There is a stigma about it, because it is evident who is on it. If all kids are being fed the same way, some of that will go away.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
15. Excellent.
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 05:58 PM
Feb 2014

I know I'd be willing to pay more in taxes to cover breakfast & lunches for all students. For many students (too many) these are the only meals they get.

Behind the Aegis

(53,951 posts)
16. Works for me and I don't have kids.
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 05:58 PM
Feb 2014

There is not one good reason, not one, why people should be hungry in this country!!

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
28. REPORT: Child Hunger Is Concentrated In Rural America
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 01:09 AM
Feb 2014

One of the sub links

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/06/10/2132331/report-child-hunger-is-concentrated-in-rural-america/



Over one in five American children lack steady access to sufficient food, and over 50 million total Americans are food insecure. Those figures come from Map the Meal Gap, an annual report from the anti-hunger charity Feeding America that tracks food security down to the county level.

Feeding America’s interactive map is based on national data from 2011 and focuses on the rates of food insecurity rather than the raw numbers. The country’s largest cities have the largest raw numbers of food-insecure children, but children in rural communities are most likely to be food insecure.Forty-three percent of America’s counties are rural, but they make up almost two-thirds of counties with high rates of child food insecurity.


Three in ten children in New Mexico, Arizona, Oregon, and Washington, D.C. face food insecurity, as do a quarter or more of children in Georgia, Florida, Arkansas, Nevada, Texas, South Carolina, Mississippi, North Carolina, California, Alabama, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Tennessee. Zavala County, Texas has the highest rate of child food insecurity: 46 percent. Click the map to access the interactive graphic on

FeedingAmerica.org:



Kick and rec! Thanks ProSense!

Michelle is Awesome!

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
32. I hope its implementation is well monitored. I hope achievement scores are correlated.
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 07:48 PM
Feb 2014

Increasing food access improves learning climate.

mopinko

(70,081 posts)
35. a real pet subject of mine.
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 09:39 AM
Feb 2014

really, really hoping that some community gardens will spring up at shuttered schools here. i also do what i do, in part, because i think it is really important for children to feel like they can just reach out and touch the earth and the food.

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
37. Absolutely.And at the high school level, kids also need lots of bright, creative vegetarian dishes.
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 07:55 PM
Feb 2014

When it comes to schools, every freakin' state can afford what it wants to afford. It's all about spending priorities.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
33. Absolutely the decent, moral and compassionate thing to do.
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 12:12 AM
Feb 2014

This is just so right on so many levels, from its nutritional and brain-development aspects to providing the message that society cares about everyone, that it's one of those things that's totally obvious after the fact.

Yea, Michelle. You go, Lady.

mopinko

(70,081 posts)
34. i absolutely support this. teachers do not need to know family income.
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 09:37 AM
Feb 2014

they do not need to know who the poor kids are, they do not need to waste valuable classroom time counting nickels, and we do not need cranky lunchroom workers.
and those kids shouldn't have to be reminded every damn day that they are poor kids who get a measly free lunch.

it says something profound to our children to invite ALL of them to lunch every day, instead of bestowing it upon the worthy.

DebJ

(7,699 posts)
36. Conservatives have a big problem with removing the 'stigma' hungry children face
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 11:00 AM
Feb 2014

with free meals. They are supposed to feel like shit for being born, you know.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
39. Federal Government Expands Access To Healthy Food For Low-Income Moms And Babies
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 11:52 AM
Feb 2014
Federal Government Expands Access To Healthy Food For Low-Income Moms And Babies

By Tara Culp-Ressler

A government program that gives federal food assistance to an estimated 9 million women and children is getting revamped for the first time in more than three decades. The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children — more commonly known as WIC — will now provide low-income Americans with more options for culturally specific food, as well as increase funding for some healthy options.

WIC is a nutritional assistance program intended to help women and their babies afford healthy food. It diverges from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), or food stamps, because it’s specifically targeted at improving healthy pregnancies and birth outcomes. This year, the program marked its 40th anniversary.

And to coincide with that milestone, the U.S. government is finalizing new rules that update WIC’s fairly limited list of foods that can be purchased under the program. Now, women will be able to use their WIC vouchers to buy a wider range of whole grain options; yogurt products; and fresh, frozen, or canned fruits and vegetables. They’ll also have more leeway to purchase foods that meet their cultural needs. And the amount of money allocated for babies’ fruit and vegetables will be boosted by 30 percent.

“The updates to the WIC food package make pivotal improvements to the program and better meet the diverse nutritional needs of mothers and their young children,” Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack noted in a statement.

- more -

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/02/28/3344211/wic-update-healthy-food/
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Michelle Obama Expands Pr...